Abstract
A replicated selection experiment aimed at increasing litter size (total number of pigs born per litter) in Danish Landrace pigs was conducted from 1984 to 1991. The experiment included two selection and two control lines. In each generation, 30 and 14 first litters were produced in selection and control lines, respectively, and dams produced two litters. Each replicate, consisting of one selection and one control line, was founded from 60 families chosen randomly from the population at large. Family selection was practiced, and the criterion was the predicted breeding value for litter size computed using a repeatability animal model, and taking into account all available information. The data consisted of 947 records from 523 dams (424 dams had two litters) representing five cycles of selection of increased litter size. Data were analyzed from a Bayesian perspective, based on marginal posterior distributions of genetic parameters of interest. Marginalization was achieved using Gibbs sampling, with a single chain length of 1 205 000. After discarding the first 5 000 iterations, a sample was drawn every ten iterations, so 120 000 samples in total were saved. Densities were estimated and plotted, and summary statistics were computed from the estimated densities. The posterior means (± standard error) of heritability and repeatability were 0.22 ± 0.06 and 0.32 ± 0.05, respectively. These point estimates of genetic parameters were within the range of literature values, although on the high side. The posterior mean (± standard error) of genetic response to selection, defined as the difference between the mean breeding values of the selected lines and that of the base population, was 1.37 ± 0.43 pigs after five cycles of selection. The regression (through the origin) of breeding values in the selected lines on generation was 0.25 ± 0.08 pigs. Several informative priors constructed from information obtained with field data in this population were used to examine their influence on inferences. The priors were influential because of the relatively small scale of the experiment. An analysis excluding data from one of the control lines gave smaller genetic variance and heritability, and a smaller response to selection. However, it appears that selection for litter size is effective, but that the true rate of response is probably smaller than data from this experiment suggest.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avalos E, Smith C (1987) Genetic improvement of litter size in the pig. Anim Prod 44:153–164
Berger JO (1985) Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York
Bichard M, Bovey M, Seidel L, David P, Tomkins C (1983) New developments in scientific pig breeding. Report No. 3, Pig Improvement Company
Gelfand AE, Smith AFM (1990) Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc 85:398–409
Haley CS, Avalos E, Smith C (1988) Selection for litter size in the pig. Anim Breed Abstr 56:317–329
Hill WG (1976) Order statistics of correlated variables and implications in genetic selection programs. Biometrics 32:889–902
IMSL, Inc. (1989) IMSL®, STAT/LIBRARY: FORTRAN subroutines for statistical analysis. Houston, Texas
Kennedy BW (1990) Use of mixed model methodology in analysis of designed experiments. In: Gianola D, Hammond K (eds) Advances in statistical methods for genetic improvement of livestok. Springer-Verlag, New York Heidelberg Berlin, pp 77–97
Lamberson WR, Johnson RK, Zimmerman DR, Long TE (1991) Direct responses to selection for increased litter size, decreased age at puberty, or random selection following selection for ovulation rate in swine. J Anim Sci 69:3129–3143
Legault C (1985) Selection of breeds, strains and individual pigs for prolificacy. J Reprod Fertil (suppl) 33:151–166
Le Roy P, Legault C, Gruand J, Ollivier L (1987) Realized heritability for litter size in selection of hyperprolific sows. Genet Sel Evol 19:351–363
Meyer K (1988) DFREML — A set of programs to estimate variance components under an individual animal model. J Dairy Sci 71 (suppl2): 33–34
Nelson EE, Robison OW (1976) Effects of post-natal maternal environment on reproduction of gilts. J Anim Sci 43:71–77
Patterson HD, Thompson R (1971) Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58:545–554
Popescu PC (1989) Cytogenetique des Mammiferes d'elevage. INRA, Paris Robertson A (1961) Inbreeding in artificial selection programs. Genet Res 2:189–194
Rutledge JJ (1980) Fraternity size in swine reproduction. 1. Effect on fecundity of gilts. J Anim Sci 51:868–870
Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, New York
Smith C, Dickerson GE, Tess MW, Bennett GL (1983) Expected relative responses to selection for alternative measures of life cycle economic efficiency of pork production. J Anim Sci 56:1306–1314
Sorensen DA, Kennedy B (1983) The use of the relationship matrix to account for genetic drift variance in the analysis of genetic experiments. Theor Appl Genet 66:217–220
Sorensen DA, Vernersen A (1991) Large scale selection for number of born piglets using an animal model. 42nd meeting EAAP, Berlin, 1 (Abstract): 105
Sorensen DA, Wang CS, Jensen J, Gianola D (1994) Bayesian analysis of genetic change due to selection using Gibbs sampling. Genet Sel Evol (in press)
Tess MW, Bennett GL, Dickerson GE (1983) Simulation of genetic changes in life cycle efficiency of pork production. II. Effects of components on efficiency. J Anim Sci 56:354–368
Toro MA, Silio L, Rodrigalez J, Dobao MT (1988) Inbreeding and family index selection for prolificacy in pigs. Anim Prod 46:79–85
Wang CS, Rutledge JJ, Gianola D (1993) Marginal inferences about variance components in a mixed linear model using Gibbs sampling. Genet Sel Evol 25:41–62
Wang CS, Rutledge JJ, Gianola D (1994) Bayesian analysis of mixed linear models via Gibbs sampling with an aplication to litter size in Iberian pigs. Genet Sel Evol (in press)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by E. J. Eisen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, C.S., Gianola, D., Sorensen, D.A. et al. Response to selection for litter size in Danish Landrace pigs: a Bayesian analysis. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 88, 220–230 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225901
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225901