Skip to main content
Log in

Robustness of statistical tests for multiplicative terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The additive main effects multiplicative interaction model is frequently used in the analysis of multilocation trials. In the analysis of such data it is of interest to decide how many of the multiplicative interaction terms are significant. Several tests for this task are available, all of which assume that errors are normally distributed with a common variance. This paper investigates the robustness of several tests (Gollob, F GH1, FGH2, FR)to departures from these assumptions. It is concluded that, because of its better robustness, the F Rtest is preferable. If the other tests are to be used, preliminary tests for the validity of assumptions should be performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cohen AC (1967) Estimation in mixtures of two normal distributions. Technometrics 9:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius PL (1980) Functions approximating Mandel's tables for the means and standard deviations of the first three roots of a Wishart matrix. Technometrics 22:613–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius PL (1993) Statistical tests and retention of terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials. Crop Sci 33:1186–1193

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius PL, Seyedsadr M, Crossa J (1992) Using the shifted multiplicative model to search for “separability” in crop cultivar trials. Theor Appl Genet 84:161–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG (1988) Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44:705–715

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG (1992) Statistical analysis of regional yield trials. AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG, Zobel RW (1988) Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analyses of yield trials. Theor Appl Genet 76:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollob HF (1968) A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika 33:73–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman LA, Haberman SJ (1990) The analysis of nonadditivity in two-way analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 85:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NL, Kotz S (1970) Continuous univariate distributions 1. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel J (1969) The partitioning of interaction in analysis of variance. J Res Int Bur Stand Sect B 73:309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel J (1971) A new analysis of variance model for nonadditive data. Technometrics 13:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP (1992) Vergleichende Untersuchungen der statistischen Eigenschaften verschiedener Stabilitätsmaße mit Anwendungen auf Hafer, Winterraps, Ackerbohnen sowie Futterund Zuckerrüben. Doctoral Thesis (unpublished), Kiel

  • Piepho HP (1994) Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) for regional yield trials: a comparison to additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis. Theor Appl Genet 89:647–654

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. R. Hallauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piepho, H.P. Robustness of statistical tests for multiplicative terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 90, 438–443 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221987

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221987

Key words

Navigation