Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamical theory of the solar wind

  • Published:
Space Science Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a review of the basic theoretical dynamical properties of an atmosphere with an extended temperature strongly bound by gravity. The review begins with the historical developments leading up to the realization that the only dynamical equilibrium of an atmosphere with extended temperature is supersonic expansion. It is shown that sufficient conditions for supersonic expansion are T(r) declining asymptotically less rapidly than 1/r, or the density at the base of the corona being less than N b given by (40) if no energy is available except through thermal conductivity, or the temperature falling within the limits given by (18) if TN α-1 throughout the corona. Less extended temperatures lead to equilibria which are subsonic or static. The hypothetical case of a corona with no energy supply other than thermal conduction from its base is considered at some length because the equations may be solved by analytical methods and illustrate the transition from subsonic to supersonic equilibrium as the temperature becomes more extended. Comparison with the actual corona shows that the solar corona is actively heated for some distance into space by wave dissipation.

The dynamical stability of the expanding atmosphere is demonstrated, and in a later section the radial propagation of acoustic and Alfvén waves through the atmosphere and wind is worked out. The calculations show that the magnetometer will probably detect waves more easily than the plasma instrument, but that both are needed to determine the mode and direction of the wave. An observer in the wind at the orbit of Earth can “listen” to disturbances generated in the corona near the sun and in turbulent regions in interplanetary space.

The possibility that the solar corona is composed of small-scale filaments near the sun is considered. It is shown that such filamentary structure would not be seen at the orbit of Earth. It is pointed out that the expansion of a non-filamentary corona seems to lead to too high a calculated wind density at the orbit of Earth to agree with the present observations, unless T(r) is constant or increases with r. A filamentary corona, on the other hand, would give the observed wind density for declining T(r).

It is shown that viscosity plays no important role in the expansion of an atmosphere either with or without a weak magnetic field. The termination of the solar wind, presumably between 10–103 AU, is discussed briefly. The interesting development here is the interplanetary L αrecently observed, which may come from the interstellar neutral hydrogen drifting into the outer regions of the solar wind.

Theory is at the present time concerned with the general dynamical principles which pertain to the expansion equilibrium of an atmosphere. It is to be expected that the rapid progress of direct observations of the corona and wind will soon permit more detailed studies to be carried out. It is important that the distinction between detailed empirical models and models intended to illustrate general principles be kept clearly in mind at all times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfvén, H.: 1947, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 107, 211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astronomer Royal: 1927, Mem. R.A.S. 64, 363 (Sec. 19).

  • Axford, W. I.: Dessler, A. J., and Gottlieb, B.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 137, 1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, L.: 1948, Z. Astrophys. 25, 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, L.: 1951, Z. Astrophys. 29, 274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, L.: 1957, Observatory 107, 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroeck, G. van: 1953, The Sun (ed. G. P. Kuiper), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 601–604.

  • Billings, D. E.: 1959, Astrophys. J. 130, 961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, D. E.: 1962, Temperature — Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, Reinhold Publishing Co., New York, Vol. 3, Part I, p. 713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, D. E.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 137, 592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, D. E. and Lilliequist, C. G.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 137, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, G. A.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 139, 675, 684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, G. A.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 141, 1455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, D. E.: 1956, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 116, 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonetti, A.: Bridge, H. S.: Lazarus, A. J.: Rossi, B., and Scherb, F.: 1963, J. Geophys. Res. 68, 4017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, H. S.: 1963, Physics Today 16, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, H. S., Egidi, A., Lazarus, A. J., Lyon, E., and Jacobsen, L.: 1964, Space Research 4.

  • Burgess, A.: 1960, Astrophys. J. 132, 503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 139, 776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, V. M. and Seaton, M. J.: 1961, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 77, 199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carovillano, R. L. and King, J. H.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 141, 526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, J. W.: 1960, Astrophys. J. 131, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, J. W.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 133, 675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S.: 1957, Smithsonian Contr. Astrophys. 2, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S.: 1959, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A253, 462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S. and Ferraro, V. C. A.: 1931, Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity 36, 77, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, D. D.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 1604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, T. L.: Ludwig, G. H.: McDonald, F. B.: 1964, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. J.: Davis, L., and Sonett, C. P.: 1960, Phys. Rev. Letters 5, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. J.: Davis, L.: Smith, E. J., and Sonett, C. P.: 1963, Science 138, 1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant, R. and Friedrichs, K. O.: 1948, Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves, Interscience Publishers, New York, pp. 419–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cournt, R. and Hilbert, D.: 1962, Methods of Mathematical Physics Vol. II, Interscience Div. of John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, E.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 268.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJager, C.: 1963, Space Science Rev. 1, 487 and Space Research 3 (ed. by H. Priester), 491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessler, A. J. and Fejer, J. A.: 1963, Planet. Space Sci. 11, 505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollfus, A.: 1953, Comptes rendus 236, 996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollfus, A.: 1957, Comptes rendus 244, 1880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, C. Y.: Gloeckler, G., and Simpson, J. A.: 1964, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fite, W. L.: Stebbings, R. F.: Hummer, D. G., and Brackman, R. T.: 1960, Phys. Rev. 119, 663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbush, S. E.: 1938, Phys. Rev. 54, 975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbush, S. E.: 1954, J. Geophys. Res. 59, 525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L. A.: VanAllen, J. A., and Hills, H. K.: 1964, J. Geophys. Res. 69, 2171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. W.: 1964, J. Geophys. Res. 69, 1691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gringauz, K. I.: Bezruvkih, V. V.: Ozerov, V. D., and Rybčinskij, R. E.: 1960, Soviet Physics — Doklady 5, 361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. W.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 141, 832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewish, A.: 1958, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 118, 534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Högbom, J. A.: 1960, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 120, 536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiepenheuer, K. O.: 1953, The Sun (ed. G. P. Kuiper), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., p. 419.

  • Kluber, H.von: 1958, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 118, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüst, R.: 1963, Space Science Rev. 1, 522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüst, R.: Meyer, F.: Trefftz, E., and Biermann, L.: 1962, Z. Naturforsch. 17a, 259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, F. B. and Trefftz, E.: 1961, Z. Naturforsch. 16a, 583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masley, A. J.: May, T. C., and Winckler, J. R.: 1962, J. Geophys. Res. 67, 3243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, P. and Simpson, J. A.: 1955, Phys. Rev. 99, 1517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, P. and Simpson, J. A.: 1957, Phys. Rev. 106, 568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michard, R.: 1954, Ann. Astrophys. 17, 429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.: 1959, Phys. Rev. Letters 2, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. W. and Spiegel, E. A.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 139, 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, P.: 1954, Phys. Rev. 101, 1397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, D. C. and Purcell, J. D.: 1962, Planet. Space Sci. 9, 455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustel, E. R.: 1963, The Solar Corona (ed. J. W. Evans), Academic Press, New York, p. 255, 331.

  • Neher, H. V. and Anderson, H. R.: 1962, J. Geophys. Res. 167, 1309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, N. F.: Scearce, C. S., and Seek, J. B.: 1964, J. Geophys. Res. 69, 3531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, N. F. and Wilcox, J.: 1964, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, M. and Snyder, F. L.: 1962, Science, 138, 1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, M. and Snyder, F. L.: 1965, J. Geophys. Res. 70, 1587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newkirk, G.: 1959, Proc. IAS-URSI Symposium.

  • Newkirk, G.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 133, 983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ney, E. P.: Huch, W. F.: Kellogg, P. J.: Stein, W., and Gillett, F.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 133, 616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, L. M. and Scarf, F. L.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 138, 1169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterbrock, D. E.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 134, 347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1958a, Astrophys. J. 128, 664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1958b, Phys. Rev. 198, 1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1958c, Phys. Rev. 110, 1445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1960, Astrophys. J. 132, 1445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1961a, Astrophys. J. 133, 1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1961b, Astrophys. J. 134, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1963, Interplanetary Dynamical Processes, Interscience Division of John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1964a, Astrophys. J. 139, 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1964b, Astrophys. J. 139, 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1964c, Astrophys. J. 139, 690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1964d, Astrophys. J. 140, 1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1965a, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1965b, Astrophys. J. 141, 1463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1965c, Planet. Space Sci. 13, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1965d, Astrophys. J. (submitted for publication).

  • Patterson, T. N. L.: Johnson, F. S., and Hanson, W. B.: 1963, Planet. Space Sci. 11, 767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petschek, H. E.: 1958, Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikel'ner, S. B.: 1950, Izv. Krymsk. astrofiz. obs. 5, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pottasch, S. R.: 1960, Astrophys. J. 131, 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarabhai, V.: 1963, J. Geophys. Res. 68, 1555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, F. L. and Noble, L. M.: 1964, AIAA J. 2, 1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman, E.: 1949, Ann. Astrophys. 12, 203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman, E.: 1961, Nuovo Cimento, Suppl 22, Ser. 10, 209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, M.: 1948, Astrophys. J. 107, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šklovskij, I. S.: Moroz, V. I., and Kurt, V. G.: 1960, Astron. Ž. 37, 931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. W.: Neugebauer, M., and Rao, U. R.: 1963, J. Geophys. Res. 68, 6361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. W. and Neugebauer, M.: 1964, Space Research 4, North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonett, C. P.: 1960, Phys. Rev. Letters 5, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonett, C. P.: Colburn, D. S.: Davis, L.: Smith, E. J., and Coleman, P. J.: 1964, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Störmer, C.: 1955, The Polar Aurora, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Hulst, H. C.: 1953, The Sun (ed. G. P. Kuiper), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 272–284, 306–311.

  • Vsekhsvjatsky, S. K.: 1963, The Solar Corona (ed. J. W. Evans), Academic Press, New York, p. 271.

  • Whang, Y. C. and Chang, C. C.: 1965, J. Geophys. Res. 70, 4175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, W. A.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 137, 914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, O. C. and Skumanich, A.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 1401.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant NASA-NsG-96-60.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parker, E.N. Dynamical theory of the solar wind. Space Sci Rev 4, 666–708 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216273

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216273

Keywords

Navigation