Skip to main content
Log in

The degradation of distance discrimination in big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) caused by different interference signals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of two big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) to discriminate the distance to an electronically synthesized “phantom” target by echolocation was tested in the presence of interfering signals presented slightly before the target echo. Interfering signals were chosen to have differing degrees of similarity to the typical echolocation emission used by the bat in this task (which was the signal used to create the phantom target), and we predicted that the degree of disruption of ranging would be proportional to the similarity of the interference to the target echo. This prediction was not confirmed; rather, all interference signals not identical to the target echo increased the threshold to about twice that found with no interference. When the interference was identical to the target echo, the threshold increased to about 4 times that with no interference. When each bat was presented with phantom target “echoes” appropriate for the other bat, its range discrimination threshold increased about ten fold, and in this case the degree of interference of different signals was related to their similarity to the target echo, not to their similarity to the bat's “normal” signal. We suggest that Eptesicus may suppress interference by a more sophisticated strategy than simple linear matched filtering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

E :

exemplar signal

M f :

foreign model signal

M r :

reversed self-model signal

M s :

self-model signal

N :

noise signal

SPL :

sound pressure level

References

  • Altes RA (1980) Detection, estimation, and classification with spectrograms. J Acoust Soc Am 67: 1232–1246

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard SM (1991) The maintenance of bats in captivity. Privately published by the author, Atlanta Zoo, Atlanta, Ga

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Marler P, Beeman K (1987) Quantitative analysis of animal vocal phonology: an application to swamp sparrow song. Ethology 76: 101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney DJ (1971) Probit analysis. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney DJ (1978) Statistical method in biological assay. Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullard JH, Fenton MB, Simmons JA (1979) Jamming bat echolocation: the clicks of arctiid moths. Can J Zool 57: 647–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellermann LW (1933) Chance orders of alternating stimuli in visual discrimination experiments. J Genet Psychol 42: 206–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl W, Schodder GR, Schröder FK (1954) Condenser transmitters and microphones with solid dielectric for airborne ultrasonics. Acoustica 4: 519–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters WM, Jacobs SC (1989) Target detection and range resolution by the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) using normal and time-reversed model echoes. J Comp Physiol A 166: 65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters WM, Jacobs SC, Simmons JA (1991) The structure of echolocation sounds used by the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus: some consequences for echo processing. J Acoust Soc Am 89: 1402–1413

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters WM, Raver KAS (1992) Effect on range-discrimination performance of the interfering signals of other bats. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 15: 143

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters WM, Raver KAS (1995) Effect of changes in echo parameters on the range resolution of Eptesicus fuscus. 10th Int Bat Res Conf Abstr 10: 168

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters WM, Raver KAS, Kazial KA (1995) Sonar signals of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, contain information about individual identity, age and family affiliation. Anim Behav 50: 1243–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty JK, Jen PH-S (1983) Bats reject clutter interference for moving targets more successfully than for stationary ones. J Comp Physiol 153: 447–8454

    Google Scholar 

  • Menne D, Kaipf I, Wagner I, Ostwald J, Schnitzler H-U (1989) Range estimation by echolocation in the bat Eptesicus fuscus: trading of phase versus time cues. J Acoust Soc Am 85: 2642–2650

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller LA (1991) Arctiid moth clicks can degrade the accuracy of range difference discrimination in echolocating big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. J Comp Physiol A 168: 571–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss CF, Schnitzler H-U (1989) Accuracy of target ranging in echolocating bats: acoustic information processing. J Comp Physiol A 165: 383–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss CF, Simmons JA (1993) Acoustic image representation of a point target in the bat Eptesicus fuscus: evidence for sensitivity to echo phase in bat sonar. J Acoust Soc Am 93: 1553–1562

    Google Scholar 

  • Roverud RC (1989) Harmonic and frequency structure used for echolocation sound pattern recognition and distance information processing in the rufous horseshoe bat. J Comp Physiol A 166: 251–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Roverud RC, Grinnell AD (1985) Echolocation sound features processed to provide distance information in the CF/FM bat, Noctilio albiventris: evidence for a gated time window utilizing both CF and FM components. J Comp Physiol A 156: 457–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Saillant PA, Simmons JA, Dear SP, McMullen TA (1993) A computational model of echo processing and acoustic imaging in frequency-modulated echolocating bats: the spectrogram correlation and transformation receiver. J Acoust Soc Am 94: 2691–2712

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1979) Perception of echo phase information in bat sonar. Science 204: 1336–1338

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1989) A view of the world through the bat's ear: the formation of acoustic images in echolocation. Cognition 33: 155–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA, Grinnell AD (1988) The performance of echolocation: acoustic images perceived by echolocating bats. In: Nachtigall PE, Moore PWB (eds) Animal sonar: processes and performance. Plenum Press, New York, pp 353–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA, Kick SA, Moffat AJM, Masters WM, Kon D (1988) Clutter interference along the target range axis in the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Acoust Soc Am 84: 551–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA, Freedman EG, Stevenson SB, Chen L, Wohlgenant TJ (1989) Clutter interference and the integration time of echoes in the echolocating bat, Eptesicusfuscus. J Acoust Soc Am 86: 1318–1332

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA, Ferragamo M, Moss CF, Stevenson SB, Altes RA (1990) Discrimination of jittered sonar echoes by the echolocating bat, Eptesicusfuscus: the shape of target images in echolocation. J Comp Physiol A 167: 589–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1995) Processing of auditory information carried by species-specific complex sounds. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 295–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Surlykke A, Miller LA (1985) The influence of arctiid moth clicks on bat echolocation; jamming or warning? J Comp Physiol A 156: 831–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward PM (1964) Probability and information theory, with applications to radar. Artech House Books, Dedham, Mass

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masters, W.M., Raver, K.A.S. The degradation of distance discrimination in big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) caused by different interference signals. J Comp Physiol A 179, 703–713 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216134

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216134

Key words

Navigation