Skip to main content
Log in

Three modes of spatiotemporal preprocessing by eyes

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

  1. 1.

    Optimal spatiotemporal filters for early vision were computed as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and α, a parameter defined as the ratio of the width of the probability distribution of velocities as perceived by the naturally behaving animal, and the characteristic velocity of the photoreceptors (the velocity required to move across a receptor's receptive field in a receptor's integration time). Animals that move slowly, on average, compared with the characteristic velocity of their photoreceptors have α ≪ 1, animals that move fast have α ≫ 1.

  2. 2.

    For α ≪ 1, the temporal part of the optimal filter adapts more to different SNRs (light levels) than the spatial part, leading to large adjustments in temporal resolving power and strong self-inhibition at high SNR, but little lateral inhibition.

  3. 3.

    For α ≫ 1, the spatial part of the filter adapts more strongly than the temporal part, leading to strong lateral inhibition at high SNR, and little self-inhibition.

  4. 4.

    For α ≈ 1, both spatial and temporal properties change about equally much when varying SNR.

  5. 5.

    Varying the width of the angular sensitivity of the photoreceptors shows that for every combination of α and SNR there is an optimal width. Visual systems with large α need wider angular sensitivities, in particular at low SNR, in order to reach the information maximum than visual systems with small α.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LMC:

Large Monopolar Cell

SNR:

signal-to-noise ratio

References

  • Autrum H (1950) Die Belichtungspotentiale und das Sehen der Insekten (Untersuchungen an Calliphora und Dixippus). Z Vergl Physiol 32:176–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Autrum H (1984) Comparative physiology of invertebrates: hearing and vision. In: Dawson WW, Enoch JM (eds) Foundations of sensory science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton GJ, Moorhead IR (1987) Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. Appl Opt 26:157–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrington AM, Lennie P (1982) The influence of temporal frequency and adaptation level on receptive field organization of retinal ganglion cells in cat. J Physiol (Lond) 333:343–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Field DJ (1987) Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am A 4:2379–2394

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz RM (1991) Motion detection and adaptation in crayfish photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol 97:777–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Hateren JH van (1992a) Theoretical predictions of spatiotemporal receptive fields of fly LMCs, and experimental validation. J Comp Physiol A 171: 157–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Hateren JH van (1992b) Real and optimal neural images in early vision. Nature 360:68–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hateren JH van (1992c) A theory of maximizing sensory information. Biol Cybern 68:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Hateren JH van (1993) Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of early vision. Vision Res 33:257–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard J (1981) Temporal resolving power of the photoreceptors of Locusta migratoria. J Comp Physiol 144:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard J, Snyder AW (1983) Transduction as a limitation on compound eye function and design. Proc R Soc Lond B 217:287–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin SB (1981) Neural principles in the visual system. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6 B. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 133–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin SB, Weckström M (1993) Fast and slow photoreceptors — a comparative study of the functional diversity of coding and conductances in the Diptera. J Comp Physiol A 172:593–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillywhite PG, Laughlin SB (1979) Transducer noise in a photoreceptor. Nature 277:569–572

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder AW (1979) Physics of vision in compound eyes. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6 A. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 225–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV, Bernard GD (1975) The effect of motion on visual acuity of the compound eye: a theoretical analysis. Vision Res 15:515–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV, Laughlin SB, Dubs A (1982) Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc R Soc Lond B 216:427–459

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Hateren, J.H. Three modes of spatiotemporal preprocessing by eyes. J Comp Physiol A 172, 583–591 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213681

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213681

Key words

Navigation