Skip to main content
Log in

Supernumerary marker 15 chromosomes: a clinical, molecular and FISH approach to diagnosis and prognosis

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seventeen patients presenting with either de novo or familial supernumerary marker (mar) 15 chromosomes were shown by fluorescent in situ hybridization techniques (FISH) to have markers derived from and composed entirely of chromosome 15 material. Using a combination of conventional cytogenetics, FISH, Southern blotting and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, it was possible to sub-classify the 17 mar(15)s into six distinct morphological and molecular groups. Analysis of DNA and metaphase spreads from the probands and their parents using probes and primers from the pericentromeric and Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes critical regions (PWS/AS), clearly differentiated between marker 15 s which included the PWS/AS critical regions and those which did not. A direct correlation between the presence of the PWS/AS region in the mar(15) and severe mental retardation was observed. Based on these results, a system of classification of supernumerary marker 15 chromosomes is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckmann JS, Tomfohrde J, Barnes RI, Williams M, Broux O, Richard I, Weiggenbach J (1993) A linkage map of human chromosome 15 with an average resolution of 2 cM and containing 55 polymorphic microsatellites. Hum Mol Genet 2: 2019–2030

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry R, McGavran L, Robinson J, Staley L (1987) Familial duplication of proximal 15q in a Prader-Willi individual and her normal father. Am J Hum Genet 41[Suppl]: A114-A114

    Google Scholar 

  • Blennow E, Anneren G, Bui TH, Berggren E, Asadi E, Nordenskjold M (1993) Characterization of supernumerary ring marker chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Am J Hum Genet 53: 433–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckton KE, Spowart G, Newton MS, Evans HJ (1985) Fortyfour probands with an additional “marker” chromosome. Hum Genet 69: 353–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabro A, Lungarotti MS, Dallapiccola B (1980) A comment on the paper: recurrence of down syndrome associated with microchromosome, by Ramos C, Rivera L, Benitez J, Tejedor E, Sanchez-Cascos A. Hum Genet 53: 287–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen DF, Ringenbergs ML, Fowler JCS, Freemantle J, Haan EA (1990) Small marker chromosomes in man: origin from pericentric heterochromatin of chromosomes 1, 9 and 16. J Med Genet 27: 155–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen DF, Eyre HJ, Ringenbergs ML, Feemantel CJ, Woodroffe P, Haan EA (1991) Chromosomal origin of small ring marker chromosomes in man. Characterization by molecular genetics. Am J Hum Genet 48: 769–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen DF, Eyre H, Yip MY, Freemantle J, Haan EA (1992) Molecular cytogenetic and clinical studies of 42 patients with marker chromosomes. Am J Med Genet 43: 709–715

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo KH, Earle E, Vissel B, Filby RG (1990) Identification of two distinct subfamilies of alpha satellite DNA that are highly specific for human chromosome 15. Genomics 7: 143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton-Smith J, Webb T, Cheng XJ, Pembrey ME, Malcolm S (1993) Duplication of chromosome-15 in the region 15q11–13 in a patient with developmental delay and ataxia with similarities to Angelman syndrome. J Med Genet 30: 529–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Crolla JA, Dennis NR, Jacobs PA (1992) A non-isotopic in situ hybridisation study of the chromosomal origin of 15 supernumerary marker chromosomes in man. J Med Genet 29: 699–703

    Google Scholar 

  • De France HF, Beemer FA, Ippel PF (1984) Duplication in chromosome 15q in a boy with the Prader-Willi syndrome; further cytogenetic confusion. Clin Genet 26: 379–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich B, Robinson WP, Knoblauch H, Buiting K, Schmidt K, Gillessenkaesbach G, Horsthemke B (1992) Molecular diagnosis of the Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes by detection of parent-of-origin specific DNA methylation in 15q11–13. Hum Genet 90: 313–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich U, Nielsen J (1974) Bisatellited extra small metacentric chromosome in newborns. Clin Genet 6: 23–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita H, Sakamoto Y, Hamamoto Y (1980) An extra idic(15p) (q11) chromosome in Prader-Willi syndrome. Hum Genet 55: 409–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall JG (1990) Genomic imprinting: review and relevance to human diseases. Am J Hum Genet 46: 857–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassold TJ, Jacobs PA (1984) Trisomy in man. Annu Rev Genet 18: 69–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins MJ, Hungshu W, Shtromas I, Haliotis T, Roder JC, Holden JJA, White BN (1985) Organization of a repetitive human 1. 8 kb Kpnl sequence localized in the heterochromatin of chromosome 15. Chromosoma 93: 77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuwano A, Mutirangura A, Dittrich B, Buiting K, Horsthemke B, Saitoh S, Niikawa N (1992) Molecular dissection of the PraderWilli/Angelman syndrome region (15q-11) by YAC cloning and FISH analysis. Hum Mol Genet 6: 417–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledbetter DH, Mascarello JT, Riccardi VM, Harper VD, Airhart SD, Strobel RJ (1982) Chromosome 15 abnormalities and the Prader-Willi syndrome: A follow-up report of 40 cases. Am J Hum Genet 34: 278–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraschio P, Cuoco C, Gimelli G, Zuffardi O, Tiepolo L (1988) Origin and clinical significance of inv dup(15). In: The cytogenetics of mammalian autosomal rearrangements. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 615–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattci JF, Mattei MG, Giraud F (1983) Prader-Willi syndrome and chromosome 15. Hum Genet 64: 356–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF (1988) A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 16: 1215–1215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moses MJ, Karatsis PA, Hamilton AE (1979) Synaptonemal complex analysis of heteromorphic trivalents in lemur hybrids. Chromosoma 70: 141–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutirangura A, Greenberg F, Butler MG, Malcolm S, Nicholls RD, Chakravarti A, Ledbetter DH (1993) Multiplex PCR of 3 dinucleotide repeats in the Prader-Willi-Angelman critical region (15q11-q13) — molecular diagnosis and mechanism of uniparental disomy. Hum Mol Genet 2: 143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozcelik T, Leff S, Robinson W, Donlon T, Lalande M, Sanjines E, Schinzel A (1992) Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide N(SNRPN), an expressed gene in the Prader-Willi syndrome critical region. Nat Genet 2: 265–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AL, Gollin SM, Greenberg F, Riccardi VM, Ledbetter DH (1987) Duplication of proximal 15q as a cause of Prader Willi syndrome. Am J Med Genet 28: 791–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkel D, Landegent J, Collins C, Fuscoe J, Segraves R, Lucas J, Gray J (1988) Fluroescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 9138–9142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plattner R, Heerema NA, Howardpeebles PN, Miles JH, Soukup S, Palmer CG (1993) Clinical findings in patients with marker chromosomes identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 91: 589–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Polani PE, Crolla JA, Roberts HJ (1989) Meiosis in trisomic female mice with Robertsonian translocations. I. Prophase pairing. Cytogenet Cell Genet 52: 111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto F, Badia L, Ribes C, Medina VH (1981) Trisomie 21 par translocation 21/21 chez deux fils d'une mère avec un microchromosome surnumeraire. Ann Genet Paris 24: 117–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos C, Rivers L, Benitez J, Tejedor E, Sanchez-Cascos A (1979) Recurrence of Down syndrome associated with microchromosome. Hum Genet 49: 7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch LA, Nevin NC (1991) Duplication of 15q112 → 15q13 in five cases with different phenotypes. J Med Genet 28: 573–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson WP, Wagstaff J, Bernasconi F, Baccichetti C, Artifoni L, Franzoni E, Suslak L (1993a) Uniparental disomy explains the occurrence of the Angelman or Prader-Willi syndrome in patients with an additional small inv dup(15) chromosome. J Med Genet 30: 756–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson WP, Binkert F, Gine R, Vazquez C, Muller W, Rosenkranz W, Schinzel A (1993b) Clinical and molecular analysis of five inv dup(15) patients. Eur J Hum Genet 1: 37–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer D, Ambros P, Andrle M (1978) Modification of DAPI banding on human chromosomes by prestaining with a DNA-binding oligopeptide antibiotic, distamycin A. Exp Cell Res 111: 327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed RM (1984) Meiotic configurations in female trisomy 21 fetuses. Hum Genet 66: 176–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Tunnacliffe A, Carter NP, Behmel A, Fergusonsmith MA, Nordenskjold M (1992) Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Gene Chromosome Cancer 4: 257–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace BMN, Hulten MA (1983) Triple chromosome synapsis in oocytes from a human foetus with trisomy 21. Ann Hum Genet 47: 271–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski LP, Witt ME, Ginsberg-Fellner F, Wilner J, Desnick RJ (1980) Prader-Willi syndrome and a bisatellited derivative of chromosome 15. Clin Genet 18: 42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulfsberg EA, Sparkes RS, Klisak IJ, Gurfield WB (1982) A 15→1 translocation in a patient mosaic for presence or absence of an isodic (15p)(q11). Am J Mod Genet 13: 417–421

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crolla, J.A., Harvey, J.F., Sitch, F.L. et al. Supernumerary marker 15 chromosomes: a clinical, molecular and FISH approach to diagnosis and prognosis. Hum Genet 95, 161–170 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209395

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209395

Keywords

Navigation