Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maligne adrenale Phäochromozytome — Probleme der klinischen Diagnostik und morphologischen Dignitätsbestimmung

Malignant adrenal pheochromocytoma—problems of clinical diagnosis and morphological discrimination

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reports on three patients with malignant adrenal phaeochromocytoma are used as a basis for discussion of involved in diagnosing functionally inactive paragangliomas and in discriminating between benign and malignant adrenomedullary tumours. Malignancy can so far only be ascertained in such neoplasms by evidence of metastatic growth. Our findings, however, show that increased tumour weight (more than 200 g), high mitotic activity (more than 5 mitoses per HPF) and loss of S-100 protein-positive subtentacular cells make it possible to distinguish high-risk cases (with increased risk of recurrence and metastasis).

Zusammenfassung

Am Beispiel von 3 Patienten mit einem malignen adrenalen Phäochromozytom werden die Probleme bet der Diagnostik funktionell stummer Paragangliome und bei der Unterscheidung bösartiger von gutartigen Nebennierenmarktumoren diskutiert. Malignitätsbeweisend ist bislang lediglich der Nachweis metastatischen Geschwulstwachstums. Die eigenen Ergebnisse belegen jedoch, daß ein erhöhtes Tumorgewicht (> 200 g), eine gesteigerte Mitoserate (über 5 Kernteilungsfiguren pro 10 Tumorgesichtsfelder) Bowie der Verlust S-100-Protein-positiver Sustentakularzellen die Erkennung von Risikobefunden (mit hoher Rezidiv- und Metastasierungswahrscheinlichkeit) erlaubt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Achilles E, Padberg B, Holl K, Kldppel G, Schröder S (1991) Immunocytochemistry of paragangliomas-value of staining for S-100 protein and glial fibrillary acid protein in diagnosis and prognosis. Histopathology 18:453–458

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen GS, Toftdahl DB, Lund JO, Strangaard S, Nielsen PE (1988) The incidence rate of pheochromocytoma and Conn's syndrome in Denmark. J Hum Hypertens 3:187–189

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan MF, Kaiser HR (1982) Persistent and recurrent pheochromozytoma. World J Surg 6:397–402

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crout J, Pisano J, Sjoersdma A (1961) Urinary excretion of catecholamines and their metabolites in pheochromocytoma. Am Heart J 61:375–381

    Google Scholar 

  5. Endo K, Shiomi K, Kasagi K, Torizuka J (1984) Imaging of medullary carcinoma of the thyroid with 131-MIBG. Lancet 11:233

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer M, Kamanabroo D, Sonderkamp H (1984) Scintigraphic imaging of carcinoid tumors with 131I-MIBG (letter). Lancet 1:8395

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frier DT, Harrison TS, Donahaue SM (1973) Rigorous biochemical criteria for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. J Surg Res 14:177–180

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gitlow SE, Medlowitz SM, Hamilton CA (1970) The biochemical techniques for detecting and establishing the presence of a pheochromocytoma: A review of ten years experience. Am J Cardiol 26:270–279

    Google Scholar 

  9. Havlik RC, Cahow B, Kinder K (1988) Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma. Arch Surg 26:626–630

    Google Scholar 

  10. Helman LJ, Cohen PS, Averbuch SD, Cooper MJ, Kaiser HR, Israel MA (1989) Neuropeptide Y expression distinguishes malignant from benign pheochromocytoma. J Clin Oncol 11:1729–1735

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heerden JA van, Sizemore GW Carney JA, Grant CS, Remine WH, Sheps SG (1984) Surgical management of the adrenal glands in the multiple endocrine neoplasia type II syndrome, World J Surg 8:612–621

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hosaka Y, Rainwater L-M, Grant CS, Farrow GM, Heerden JA van, Lieber MM (1986) Pheochromocytoma: Nuclear desoxyribonucleic acid patterns studied by flow cytometry. Surgery 100:1003–1010

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jones DH, Reid JL, Hamilton CA, Allison JL (1980) The biochemical diagnosis, localisation and follow up of pheochromocytoma: The role of plasma and urinary catecholamine measurements. Q L Med 49:341–361

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kimming B, Brandeis WE, Eisenhur M (1984) Spezifische Szintigraphie des Neuroblastoms mit Met-jod-benzylguanidin. Nucl Compact 15:42–48

    Google Scholar 

  15. Padberg BC, Achilles E, Garbe E, Dralle H, Klöppel G, Schröder S (1990) Histologie, Immuncytochemie und DNA-Cytophotometrie des adrenalen Phäochromozytoms (PCC) — eine morphologische Untersuchung an 64 Turmoren. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 74:289–294

    Google Scholar 

  16. Padberg BC, Garbe E, Achilles E, Dralle H, Bressel M, Schöder S (1990) Adrenomedullary hyperplasia and phaeochromocytoma. DNA cytophotometric findings in 47 cases. Virchows Arch [A] 416:443–446

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosai I (1989) Adrenal gland and other paraganglia In: Rosai I (ed) Ackerman's surgical pathology, 7th edn, vol 1. Mosby, St. Louis Toronto Washington/DC, pp 789–818

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saaman NA, Hickey R, Shutts P (1988) Diagnosis, localisation, and management of pheochromocytoma. Cancer 62:2451–2460

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shapiro B, Sisson JC, Lloyd R (1985) Iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine for the locating of suspected pheochromocytoma: Experience in 400 cases. J Nucl Med 26:576–585

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sheldon G, Jiang NS, Kleen GG (1988) Diagnostic evaluation of pheochromocytoma. Endocrinal Metab Clin North Am 17:397–414

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stenström G, Ernest I, Tiskell L (1988) Long-term results in 64 patients operated for pheochromocytoma. Acta Med Scand 223:345–352

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas JL, Bernardino ME, Samaan NA, Hichey RC (1981) CT of pheochromocytoma. AIR Am J Roentgenol 137:1227–1231

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wieland DM, Wu JL, Brown LE,Manager LA (1980) Radiolabeled adrenergic neuronblocking agents: Adrenomedullary imaging with 131Iodobenzylguanidine. J Nucl Med 21:349–353

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brückner, M., Padberg, B.C., Dürig, M. et al. Maligne adrenale Phäochromozytome — Probleme der klinischen Diagnostik und morphologischen Dignitätsbestimmung. Langenbecks Arch Chir 378, 37–40 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207993

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207993

Key words

Navigation