Skip to main content
Log in

Antitumor properties of chemically detoxified killed Brucella abortus organisms

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Killed Brucella abortus organisms of the vaccinal strain B19 were detoxified by incubation in NaOH. A 24-h incubation in 0.01 M NaOH increased the LD50 of smooth (S) and rough (R) organisms 2–3 times in normal mice and 50–100 times in adrenalectomized mice. This NaOH treatment did not alter the antitumor activity of Brucella abortus as shown in EL4 lymphoma- and Lewis carcinoma-grafted mice. After incubation in NaOH, S bacteria injected IV retained their ability to provoke spleen hypertrophy and antibody synthesis, and S and R organisms injected into he footpad had comparable ability to induce granulomas. NaOH treatment tended to diminish the mitogenic activity of R bacteria for spleen cell cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bekierkunst A (1976) Stimulation of lymphocytes proliferation by killed mycobacteria and other species. Infect Immun 14:28

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger FM, Fukui GM, Ludwig BJ, Rosselet J (1969) Increased host resistance to infection elicited by lipopolysaccharides from Brucella abortus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 131:1376

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chedid L, Audibert F, Bona C, Parant F, Parant M (1975) Biological activities of endotoxins detoxified by alkylation. Infect Immun 12:714

    Google Scholar 

  4. Damais C, Bona C, Chedid L, Fleck J, Nauciel C, Martin JP (1975) Mitogenic effect of bacterial peptidoglycans possessing adjuvant activity. J Immunol 115:268

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freedman HH, Fox AE, Willis S, Schwartz BS (1975) Induced sensitization of normal laboratory animals to Brucella abortus endotoxin. J Bacteriol 95:286

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman CW, Sultzer BM (1979) Characterization of the chemical and physical properties of a novel B lymphocytes activator, endotoxin protein. Infect Immun 24:685

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lacave C, Asselineau J, Serre A, Roux J (1969) Comparaison de la composition chimique des fractions lipopolysaccharidiques et d'une fraction polysaccharidique isolée de Brucella melitensis. Eur J Biochem 9:189

    Google Scholar 

  8. Le Garrec Y, Sabolovic D, Toujas L, Guelfi J, Pilet C (1974) Activity of inactivated Brucella in antitumour prophylactic effect and combination with specific immunostimulation. Biomedicine 21:40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Le Garrec Y, Toujas L, Martin A, Dazord L, Pilet C (1978) Influence of the antigenicity of Brucella preparations on modulation of the immune responses to sheep erythrocytes. Infect Immun 20:6

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mann HB, Whitney DR (1974) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 18:50

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martin A, Le Garrec Y, Dazord L, Toujas L (1978) Modulation of immune responses by killed Brucella abortus organisms: comparison of the effect of smooth and rough strains on T-dependent responses. Infect Immun 21:1027

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martin A, Toujas L, Le Garrec Y, Dazord L, Amice J (1979) Resistance to tumor graft in mice treated with inactivated Brucella abortus cultured in smooth or rough phase. J Natl Cancer Inst 62:123

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nauts HC, Swift WE, Bradley LC (1946) The treatment of malignant tumors by bacterial toxins as developed by the late William B Coley, M.D., reviewed in the light of modern research. Cancer Res 6:205

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nowotny A (1963) Endotoxoid preparations. Nature 197:721

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nowotny A, Golub S, Key B (1971) Fate and effect of endotoxin derivatives in tumor-bearing mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 136:65

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nowotny A, Behling UH, Chang HL (1975) Relation of structure to function in bacterial endotoxins. VIII. Biological activities in a polysaccharide-rich fraction. J Immunol 115:199

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raistrich H, Topley WWC (1934) Immunizing fractions isolated from Bac. Aertrycke. Br J Exp Pathol 15:113

    Google Scholar 

  18. Redfearn MS (1960) An immunological study of antigens of Brucella extracted by Westphal technique. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin

  19. Renoux M, Renoux G, Palat A, Nehemie C (1976) Activité mitogénique des fractions de Brucella sur les lymphocytes en culture. Dev Biol Stand 31:230

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ribi E, Parker R, Strain SM, Mizuno Y, Nowotny A, Von Eschen KB, Cantrell JL, MacLaughlin CA, Hwang KM, Goren MB (1979) Peptides as requirement for immunotherapy of the guinea pig line-10 tumor with endotoxins. Cancer Immunol Immunother 7:43

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spellman JM, Reed ND (1979) Immune and mitogenic responses by Balb/c, C3Hej and nude mice to Brucella abortus bacterin and lipopolysaccharide. Infect Immun 24:371

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sultzer BM, Goodman CW (1976) Endotoxin protein: a B-cell mitogen and polyclonal activator of C3H HeJ lymphocytes. J Exp Med 144:821

    Google Scholar 

  23. Von Jeney N, Gunther E, Jann K (1977) Mitogenic stimulation of murine spleen cells: relation to susceptibility to Salmonella infection. Infect Immun 26:33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Le Garrec, Y., Martin, A., Collet, B. et al. Antitumor properties of chemically detoxified killed Brucella abortus organisms. Cancer Immunol Immunother 11, 63–68 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00205776

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00205776

Keywords

Navigation