Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

French impersonal constructions

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional analyses of French impersonal constructions (ICs) involving the dummy il have distinguished “impersonal passive” from “extraposition of indefinite” according to whether the verbal morphology is passive or active. This paper proposes instead to distinguish ICs according to whether the predicate is unergative or not, arguing that the dummy enters as a 2 in unergative ICs, and as a 1 otherwise. In unergative ICs, passive morphology arises from advancement of the dummy from 2 to 1, while active morphology results from demotion of the postverbal nominal from 1 to 2 prior to the entrance of the dummy. In other ICs (e.g. passive and unaccusative), the postverbal nominal is neither an initial nor final 1, but nonetheless manifests subject properties. This supports an analysis in which the postverbal nominal, an initial 2, advances to 1 and is then put en chômage by the entry of a dummy 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berinstein, Ava: 1985, Evidence for Multiattachment in K'ekchi Mayan, Garland Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickford, John Albert: 1987, Universal Constraints on Relationally Complex Clauses, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boons, Jean-Pierre, A. Guillet, and C. Leclère: 1973, La structure des phrases simples en français 1: les verbes intransitifs, Laboratoire d'Automatique, Documentaire et Linguistique. CNRS, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burzio, Luigi: 1986, Italian Syntax; A Government-Binding Approach, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Bernard: 1977, ‘In Defense of Spontaneous Demotion: the Impersonal Passive’, in Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical Relations P. Cole and J. Sadock (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couquaux, Daniel: 1980, ‘Place de la transformation Montée dans la syntaxe de français moderne’, Le Français Moderne 48, 193–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, William D.: 1986, Choctaw Verb Agreement and Universal Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, Stanley: 1985, Union Constructions in Japanese: A Unified Analysis of -sase and -rare, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.

  • Dubinsky, Stanley and Carol Rosen: 1987, A Bibliography on Relational Grammar through April 1987, distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliott, Neil: 1986, ‘On the Derivation of en-cliticization’, in Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, H. Borer (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 97–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, Gilles: 1974, La coréférence: syntaxe ou sémantique? Editions de Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaatone, David: 1970, ‘La transformation impersonelle en français’, Le Français Moderne 38, 389–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Jeanne and Eduardo Raposo: 1986, ‘Clause Union, the Stratal Uniqueness Law and the Chômeur Relation’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 295–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1982, ‘On the Lexical Representation of Romance Reflexive Clitics’, in The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, J. Bresnan (ed.), pp. 87–148.

  • Grévisse, Maurice: 1980, Le bon usage, Editions Duculot, Paris-Gembloux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Maurice: 1975, Méthodes en syntaxe, Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanse, Joseph: 1987, Nouveau dictionnaire des difficultés du français moderne, Editions Duculot, Paris-Gembloux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Alice; 1984, ‘Inversion as a Rule of Universal Grammar: Georgian Evidence’, in Perlmutter and Rosen (1984), pp. 259–291.

  • Jackson, Charles: 1982, ‘Multi-Level Syntactic Description: Evidence from Tamil’, in Working Papers in Relational Grammar, University of California, San Diego, pp. 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1974, French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1983, Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward: 1975, ‘Some Universals of Passive in Relational Grammar’, Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 340–352.

  • Legendre, Géraldine: 1986, ‘Object Raising in French: A Unified Account’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 137–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1987, Topics in French Syntax, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • --: 1988a, ‘Two Classes of Unergatives in French?’ Papers from the Twentyfourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 259–274.

  • --: 1988b, ‘On the Issue of Multiple Syntactic Levels: Evidence from French Control’, Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, pp. 301–312.

  • --: in press, ‘Unaccusativity in French’, Lingua.

  • --: to appear, ‘Inversion with Certain French Experiencer Verbs’, Language.

  • Marlett, Stephen A.: 1984, ‘Personal and Impersonal Passives in Seri’, in Perlmutter and Rosen (1984), pp. 217–239.

  • Martin, Robert: 1970, ‘La transformation impersonelle’, Revue de Linguistique Romane 34, 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsark, Gary: 1974, Existential Sentences in English, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olié, Annie: 1982, ‘Source and Fate of en’, unpublished manuscript, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1983, ‘Overt and Silent Dummies in French: A Relational Approach to Impersonal Constructions’, unpublished manuscript, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozkaragöz, Inci Z.: 1986, ‘Monoclausal Double Passives in Turkish’, in Dan Slobin and Karl Zimmer (eds.) Studies in Turkish Linguistics, Typological Studies in Language, 8, John Benjamins Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, David M. (ed.): 1983a, Studies in Relational Grammar 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1983b, ‘Personal vs. Impersonal Constructions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 141–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • --: 1983c, ‘The Active Dummy Law’, unpublished paper delivered to the Grammatical Relations Festival, Cornell University.

  • --: 1986, ‘Some Consequences of the Unaccusative Hypothesis for the Theory of Union’, unpublished paper given at the Meeting of the Northeastern Linguistics Society, MIT.

  • --: 1987, ‘What Underlies So-Called Reflexive Morphology?’ unpublished Sapir Lecture, LSA Institute, Stanford University.

  • —: 1989, ‘Multiattachment and the Unaccusative Hypothesis: The Perfect Auxiliary in Italian’, Probus: Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 1, 63–119 [originally written in 1981].

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, David M. and Paul M. Postal: 1974, Lectures on Relational Grammar, LSA Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amhertz.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1977, ‘Toward a Universal Characterization of Passivization’, Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley. Reprinted in Perlmutter (1983a), pp. 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • --: 1983, ‘Some Proposed Laws of Basic Clause Structure’, in Perlmutter (1983a), pp. 81–128.

  • --: 1984a, ‘The 1-Advancement Exclusiveness Law’, in Perlmutter and Rosen (1984), pp. 81–125.

  • --: 1984b, ‘Impersonal Passives and Some Relational Laws’, in Perlmutter and Rosen (1984), pp. 126–170.

  • Perlmutter, David M. and Carol Rosen (ed.): 1984, Studies in Relational Grammar 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, David M. and Annie Zaenen: 1984, ‘The Indefinite Extraposition Construction in Dutch and German’, in Perlmutter and Rosen (1988), pp. 171–216.

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves: 1978, ‘Trace Theory and French Syntax’, Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages, S. Jay Keyser (ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 65–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • --: 1981, ‘On Case and Impersonal Constructions’, in Levels of Syntactic Representation, R. May and J. Koster (eds.), Dordrecht, pp. 219–252.

  • —: 1986, ‘Sur la syntaxe de en et le paramètre du sujet nul’, in La Grammaire Modulaire, Mitsou Ronat and Daniel Couquaux (eds.), Editions de Minuit, Paris, pp. 211–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, Paul M.: 1982, ‘Arc Pair Grammar Descriptions’, in The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Pauline Jacobson and Geoffrey Pullum (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 341–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1984, ‘French Indirect Object Clitization and SSC/BT’. Linguistic Analysis 14, 111–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1986, Studies of Passive Clauses, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • --: to appear, ‘French Indirect Object Demotion; in Studies in Relational Grammar 3, Brian Joseph and Paul Postal (eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • —: 1989, Masked Inversion in French, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, Andrew: 1978, ‘Agentive Causatives in Romance: Accessibility versus Passivization’, Journal of Linguistics 14, 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Carol: 1981, The Relational Structure of Reflexive Clauses: Evidence from Italian, Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, [published 1988, Garland Publishers, New York].

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1986, ‘Star Means Bad: A Syntactic Divertimento for Italianists’, Italica 64, 443–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Carol and Kashi Wali: 1989, ‘Twin Passives, Inversion and Multistratalism in Marathi’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouveret and Vergnaud: 1980, ‘Specifying Reference to the Subject: French Causatives and Conditions on Representations’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 97–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruwet, Nicolas: 1972, Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français, Editions de Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1986, ‘Note sur les verbes météorologiques’, Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 15, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake, Alan: 1982, ‘The Impersonal Passive in Lithuanian’, Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, pp. 508–524.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Legendre, G. French impersonal constructions. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 8, 81–128 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00205532

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00205532

Keywords

Navigation