Skip to main content
Log in

Spectral properties of movement perception in the dronefly Eristalis

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Spectral-sensitivity functions of large-field movement-detecting units in the lobula plate of the dronefly Eristalis tenax L., which is a Batesian mimic of the honeybee, were measured using visual stimuli consisting of light flashes, or moving gratings. Two classes of units were studied, one class responding to inward horizontal motion in the contralateral eye (presumably the homologue of the well-known ‘HI’ in other fly species), and the other class responding to vertically-down-ward motion in the contralateral eye.

  2. 2.

    In both classes of units, the spectral-sensitivity function of the response to ‘flashes’ is characterized by two peaks, one in the UV at ca. 350 nm and the other in the blue at ca. 475 nm (Figs. 3, 8). It resembles the spectral-sensitivity function of the R1-R6 class of receptors in other flies.

  3. 3.

    In both classes of units, the spectral-sensitivity function of the response to ‘movement’ is characterized by a single peak, occurring in the blue at ca. 450 nm (Figs. 7, 9).

  4. 4.

    Control experiments on homologous units in the Australian Sheep Blowfly Lucilia cuprina, using identical stimulating conditions reveal that the response to flashes as well as movement possesses a dual-peaked spectral sensitivity, with one peak in the UV and the other in the blue-green region of the spectrum (Figs. 10–12).

  5. 5.

    The results indicate that the pathways subserving the inputs to movement-detecting neurons in Eristalis are driven by more than one spectral class of photoreceptors. They also reveal that the spectral sensitivity of movement detection in Eristalis bears a closer resemblance to that of the honeybee, than to that of other flies. This similarity to the honeybee may arise from the fact that the dronefly and the honeybee occupy similar ecological niches, both foraging for nectar in flowers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop LG (1974) An ultraviolet receptor in a dipteran compound eye. J Comp Physiol 91:267–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop LG, Keehn DG (1967) Neural correlates of the optomotor response in the fly. Kybernetik 3:288–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchner E (1984) Behavioural analysis of spatial vision in insects. In: Ali M (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 561–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Datum K-H, Weiler R, Zettler F (1986) Immunocytochemical demonstration of Gamma-amino butyric acid and glutamic acid decarboxylase in R7 photoreceptors and C2 centrifugal fibres in the blowfly visual system. J Comp Physiol A 159:241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak DR, Bishop LG, Eckert HE (1975) On the identification of movement detectors in the fly optic lobe. J Comp Physiol 100:5–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak DR, Srinivasan MV, French AS (1980) The contrast sensitivity of fly movement-detecting neurons. Vision Res 20:397–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert H (1971) Spektrale Empfindlichkeit des Komplexauges von Musca. Kybernetik 14:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert H, Hamdorf K (1981) The contrast frequency-dependence: A criterion for judging the non-participation of neurons in the control of behavioural responses. J Comp Physiol 145:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie RC (1979) Electrophysiological analysis of fly retina. I: Comparative properties of R1–6 and R7 and 8. J Comp Physiol 129:19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie RC (1985) Functional organization of the fly retina. In: Ottoson D (ed) Progress in sensory physiology vol 5. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K (1976) Functional characterization and anatomical identification of motion sensitive neurons in the lobula plate of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala. Z Naturforsch 31c:628–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg M, Buchner E (1977) The role of retinula cell types in visual behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol 117:127–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge GA, Mimura K, Tsukahara Y (1975) Fly photoreceptors. II. Spectral and polarized light sensitivity in the drone fly Eristalis. Proc R Soc Lond B 190:225–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilse D (1949) Colour discrimination in the drone fly Eristalis tenax. Nature 163:255–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser W (1975) The relationship between visual movement detection and colour vision in insects. In: Horridge GA (ed) The compound eye and vision of insects. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 359–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld K, Lutz B (1974) Lateral inhibition in the compound eye of the fly, Musca. Z Naturforsch 29c:95–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1973) Spectral response of moving detecting and ‘sustaining’ fibres in the optic lobe of the bee. J Comp Physiol 82:135–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1979) Spectral sensitivity and colour vision in invertebrates. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates. (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6A). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 503–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddess T, Laughlin SB (1985) Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency. Proc R Soc Lond B 225:251–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Matic T (1983) Electrical inhibition in the retina of the butterfly Papilio. I. Four spectral types of photoreceptors. J Comp Physiol 152:169–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Matic T, Laughlin SB (1981) Changes in the intensity-response function of an insect's photoreceptor due to light adaptation. J Comp Physiol 145:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann GD, Arnett DW (1972) Spectral and polarization sensitivity of the dipteran visual system. J Gen Physiol 59:534–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Nässel DR, Holmqvist MH, Hardie RC, Hakanson R, Sundler F (1988) Histamine-like immunoreactivity in photoreceptors of the compound eyes and ocelli of the flies Calliphora erythrocephala and Musca domestica. Cell Tissue Res 253:639–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavenga DG (1979) Pseudopupils of compound eyes. In: Autrum H (ed) Comparative physiology and evolution of vision in invertebrates. (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol 7/6A) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 357–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J, Abeln RG (1983) Spectral sensitivity of the landing blowfly. J Comp Physiol 150:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsukahara Y, Horridge GA (1977) Interaction between two retinula cell types in the anterior eye of the dronefly Eristalis. J Comp Physiol 115:287–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K, Kirschfeld K, Stavenga DG (1982) Spectral effects of the pupil in fly photoreceptors. J Comp Physiol 146:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (1981) Spatial vision in arthropods. In: Autrum H (ed) Comparative physiology and evolution of vision in invertebrates. (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6C) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 287–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyszecki G, Stiles WS (1967) Color science. John Wiley, New York p 584

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivasan, M.V., Guy, R.G. Spectral properties of movement perception in the dronefly Eristalis . J Comp Physiol A 166, 287–295 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204803

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204803

Key words

Navigation