Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiology of the continent ileostomy reservoir: I. Method of examination and normal findings

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to describe the radiologic methods used to study continent ileostomy reservoirs and to depict the normal radiologic features and variations identified by these procedures. During an 8-year period, 408 double-contrast studies were performed in 261 patients. The present study comprises 170 examinations in 99 patients with normal findings. A high-density barium contrast medium and air were used. Modest variation in the size and shape of the reservoirs was observed. The mucosal pattern of the reservoirs resembled that of the ileum but the folds were slightly wider. The continence-providing valves were 3–5 cm long and had a diameter of 2.5–4.0 cm. The diameter of the afferent ileal segments was usually slightly larger than that of more proximal ileal segments, with an upper limit of approximately 4 cm. The efferent ileal segments generally had a straight course without widening or outpouches. Retrograde barium double-contrast examination is a satisfactory method for the evaluation of continent ileostomy reservoirs. Here we define the range of normal variations of such reservoirs as seen on retrograde double-contrast radiologic examinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tizzoni G, Foggi A. Die Wiederherstellung der Harnblase: Experimentelle Untersuchungen. Zentralbl Chir 1888;15:921–924

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gilchrist RK, Merricks JW, Hamlin HH, Rieger IT. Construction of a substitute bladder and urethra. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1950;90:752–760

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bricker EM, Eiseman B. Bladder reconstruction from cecum and ascending colon following resection of pelvic viscera. Ann Surg 1950;132:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harper JGM, Berman MH, Hertzberg AD, Lerman F, Brendler H. Observations on the use of the cecum as a substitute urinary bladder. J Urol 1954;71:600–602

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tasker JH. Ileo-cystoplasty: a new technique—an experimental study with report of a case. Br J Urol 1953;25:349–357

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ekman H, Jacobsson G, Kock NG, Sundin T. The functional behaviour of different types of intestinal urinary bladder substitutes. Paris, XII Cong Soc Int d'Urol 1964;11:213

    Google Scholar 

  7. Valiente MA, Bacon HE. Construction of pouch using “pantaloon” technique for pull-through of ileum following total colectomy. Am J Surg 1955;90:742–750

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kock NG. Infra-abdominal “reservoir” in patients with permanent ileostomy: preliminary observations on a procedure resulting in fecal “continence” in five ileostomy patients. Arch Surg 1969;99:223–231

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 1978;2:85–88

    Google Scholar 

  10. Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M, et al. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:459–466

    Google Scholar 

  11. Montagne J-P, Kressel HY, Moss AA, Schrock TR. Radiologic evaluation of the continent (Kock) ileostomy. Radiology 1978;127:325–329

    Google Scholar 

  12. Diner WC, Cockrill HH. The continent ileostomy (Kock pouch): roentgenologic features. Gastrointest Radiol 1979;4:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  13. Standertskjöld-Nordenstam C-G, Palmu A, Sivula A. Radiological assessment of nipple-valve insufficiency in Kock's continent reservoir ileostomy. Br J Surg 1979;66:269–272

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stephens DH, Mantell BE, Kelly KA. Radiology of the continent ileostomy. AJR 1979;132:717–721

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keller RJ, Khilnani MT, Bauer JJ, Gelernt IM. Continent ileostomy. Mt Sinai J Med 1984;51:473–478

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ekberg O, Fork F-T. The Kock continent ileostomy: radiology of dysfunctions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1987;146:514–519

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lycke KG, Göthlin JH, Jensen JK, Philipson BM, Kock NG. Radiology of the continent ileostomy reservoir: II. Findings in patients with late complications. Abdom Imaging 1994;19:124–131

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berglund B, Kock NG, Myrvold HE. Volume capacity and pressure characteristics of the continent ileostomy reservoir. Scand J Gastroenterol 1984;19:683–690

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steichen FM. The creation of autologous substitute organs with stapling instruments. Am J Surg 1977;134:659–673

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kock NG, Brevinge H, Philipson BM, Öjerskog B. Continent Ileostomy: the present technique and long term results. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1986;75:63–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lycke, K.G., Göthlin, J.H., Jensen, J.K. et al. Radiology of the continent ileostomy reservoir: I. Method of examination and normal findings. Abdom Imaging 19, 116–123 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203484

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203484

Key words

Navigation