Skip to main content
Log in

The use of visual information by house flies, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae), foraging in resource patches

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

House flies, Musca domestica, respond to visual contrasts on the substrate if a resource is associated with the contrasting patterns. Visible resource patch boundaries serve as a signal to flies that they are about to leave a rewarding patch. Searching flies respond to such visual information by walking along the resource patch boundary and turning back into the patch at its edge. This edge detection and response serve as a mechanism for flies with visual cues to stay in a rewarding patch and locate more resources within it. The intensity of their response correlates with the quality of the resource. In the absence of visual cues, patch shape affects foraging success; flies find more resources in circular than in linear resource distributions. The effects of visual cues, however, render patch shape unimportant. Various substrate contrasts are effective as resource information for flies: dark (e.g., green) figures on bright (e.g., white) backgrounds or bright figures on dark backgrounds. Responses to substrate contrasts measured in this study indicate that, over the short term, house flies can learn a visual cue associated with a food source.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell WJ (1985) Sources of information controlling motor patterns in arthropod local search orientation. J Insect Physiol 31:837–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell WJ (1990) Searching behavior patterns in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 35:447–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Wrubel RP (1985) Learning by grasshoppers: association of colour/light intensity with food. Physiol Entomol 10:359–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Couvillon PA, Bitterman ME (1987) Discrimination of color-odor compounds by honeybees: tests of a continuity model. Anim Learn Behav 15:218–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier VG (1957) Communication by insects: physiology of dancing. Science 125:331–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier VG (1963) The physiology of insect senses. John Wiley & Sons, New York NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm JE, Bell WJ (1987) Search orientation of Musca domestica in patches of sucrose drops. Physiol Entomol 12:297–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushi T (1976) Classical conditioning to visual stimuli in the housefly, Musca domestica. J Insect Physiol 22:361–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushi T (1983) The role of learning on the finding of food in the searching behaviour of the housefly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Entomol General 8:241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushi T (1985) Visual learning in walking blowflies, Lucilia cuprina. J Comp Physiol A 157:771–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushi T (1989) Learning and discrimination of coloured papers in the walking blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. J Comp Physiol A 166:57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould JL (1985) How bees remember flower shapes. Science 227:1492–1494

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould JL (1986) Pattern learning by honey bees. Anim Behav 34:990–997

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch J, Holliday M (1988) A fundamental distinction in the analysis and interpretation of behavior. J Comp Psychol 102:372–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Jander R (1971) Visual pattern recognition and directional orientation in insects. Ann NY Acad Sci 188:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Jander R (1975) Ecological aspects of spatial orientation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 6:171–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanrot N, Campan R, Lambin M (1981) Functional exploration of the visual field of the wood-cricket, Nemobius sylvestris. Physiol Entomol 6:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG, Lane MA (1985) Flower petal microtexture is a tactile cue for bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:4750–4752

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin M (1984) Retinal scanning and visual inputs in freely walking crickets. Physiol Entomol 9:181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer M, Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW (1990) Visual edge detection in the honeybee and its chromatic properties. Proc R Soc Lond B 238:321–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor KL, Aracena JM, Bell WJ (1987) Search duration of Drosophila melanogaster on homogeneous sucrose patches: relative effects of starvation period, sucrose concentration and patch size. J Ethol 5:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuboer JFW (1986) A comparative view on colour vision. Netherlands J Zool 36:344–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Varjú D (1975) Stationary and dynamic responses during visual edge fixation by walking insects. Nature 255:330–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (1981) Spatial vision in arthropods. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates. (Handbook of sensory physiology VII/6C). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 287–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrhahn C (1984) Ocellar vision and orientation in flies. Proc R Soc Lond B 222:409–411

    Google Scholar 

  • White J, Tobin TR, Bell WJ (1984) Local search in the housefly Musca domestica after feeding on sucrose. J Insect Physiol 30:477–487

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conlon, D., Bell, W.J. The use of visual information by house flies, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae), foraging in resource patches. J Comp Physiol A 168, 365–371 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198355

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198355

Key words

Navigation