Skip to main content
Log in

Binocular responses of neurons in the barn owl's visual Wulst

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Binocular responses have been recorded extra-cellularly at 58 sites in the barn owl's (Tyto alba) visual Wulst. Neurons showed disparity tuning to stimulation with moving bars, moving sinewave gratings and a moving visual-noise stimulus. Responses to sinewave gratings as a function of disparity were cyclic, with the period of a cycle of the response being correlated to one cycle of the stimulus. Cyclic responses were also found when bars or noise were used as a stimulus, but, especially in response to visual noise, one response peak, the main peak, was different from the other peaks, the sidepeaks: usually, the main peak was either higher or narrower or both higher and narrower than the sidepeaks. When the responses to different spatial frequencies were compared, response maxima coincided at the main peak, but not at the other peaks. In analogy to auditory physiology the disparity at which the frequency-independent peak occurs is termed ‘characteristic disparity’. Spatial-frequency tuning revealed broad tuning, ranging from 1 to more than 3 octaves at 50% of the maximal response. Disparity tuning was broad at the onset of the response and sharpened later. The data are discussed within the framework of a model for the neural representation of visual disparity that was derived from a model proposed earlier for the representation of interaural time difference, the main cue for encoding sound-source azimuths in the barn owl.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ITD:

interaural time difference

CD:

characteristic delay

RF:

receptive field

References

  • Barlow HB, Blakemore C, Pettigrew JD (1967) The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol (Lond) 193:327–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake R, Wilson HR (1991) Neural models of stereoscopic vision. Trends Neurosci 14:445–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr CE, Konishi M (1988) Axonal delay lines create maps of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:8311–8315

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (1991) Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure. Nature 352:156–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster D (1981) A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 311:623–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer B, Krüger J (1979) Disparity tuning and binocularity of single neurons in cat visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 35:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer B, Poggio OF (1979) Depth sensitivity of binocular cortical neurons of behaving monkeys. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 204:409–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleet DJ, Jepson AD (1991) Phase-based disparity measurement. CVGIP: Image understanding 53:198–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RD, Ohzawa I (1990) On the neurophysiological organization of binocular vision. Vision Res 30:1661–1676

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita I, Konishi M (1991) The role of GABAergic inhibition in processing of interaural time difference in the owl's auditory system. J Neurosci 11:722–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond P (1991) Binocular phase specificity of striate cortical neurons. Exp Brain Res 87:615–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond P, MacKay DM (1975) Differential responses of cat visual cortical cells to textured stimuli. Exp Brain Res 22:427–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffress LA (1948) A place theory of sound localization. J Comp Physiol Psychol 41:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz B (1971) Foundations of Cyclopean perception. The University of Chicago Press

  • Karten HJ, Hodos W, Nauta WJH, Revzin AM (1973) Neural connections of the “visual Wulst” of the avian telencephalon. Experimental studies in the pigeon (Columba livia) and owl (Speotyto cunicularia). J Comp Neurol 150:253–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi M (1986) Centrally synthesized maps of sensory space. Trends Neurosci 9:163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee DN, van der Weel FR, Hitchcock T, Matejowsky E, Pettigrew JD (1992) Common principle of guidance by echolocation and vision. J Comp Physiol A 171:563–571

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVay S, Voigt T (1988) Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex. Visual Neurosci 1:395–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr D, Poggio T (1979) A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proc R Soc Lond B 204:301–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew JEW, Frisby JP (1981) Psychophysical and computational studies towards a theory of human stereopsis. Artificial Intelligence 17:349–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Moiseff A, Konishi M (1981) Neuronal and behavioral sensitivity to binaural time difference in the owl. J Neurosci 1:40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Movshon JA, Thompson ID, Tolhurst DJ (1978) Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 283:101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomura M, Matsumoto G, Fujiwara S (1990) A binocular model for the simple cell. Biol Cybern 63:237–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (1986a) The binocular organization of simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 56:221–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (1986b) The binocular organization of complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 56:243–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD (1990) Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science 249:1037–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew JD (1979) Binocular visual processing in the owl's telencephalon. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 204:435–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew JD (1990) Is there a single most-efficient algorithm for stereopsis? In: Blakemore C (ed) Vision: coding and efficiency. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew JD, Konishi M (1976a) Neurons selective for orientation and binocular disparity in the visual Wulst of the barn owl (Tyto alba). Science 193:675–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew JD, Konishi M (1976b) Effect of monocular deprivation on binocular neurons in the owl's visual Wulst. Nature 264:753–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew JD, Nikara T, Bishop PO (1968) Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence. Exp Brain Res 6:391–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio GF, Fischer B (1977) Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkeys. J Neurophysiol 40:1392–1405

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio GF, Poggio T (1984) The analysis of stereopsis. Annu Rev Neurosci 7:379–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio GF, Motter BC, Squatrito S, Trotter Y (1985) Responses of neurons in visual cortex (VI and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms. Vision Res 25:397–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose JE, Grass NG, Geisler CD, Hind JE (1966) Some neural mechanisms in the inferior colliculus of the cat which may be relevant to localization of a sound source. J Neurophysiol 29:288–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger TD (1988) Stereo disparity computation using Gabor filters. Biol Cybern 59:405–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi TT, Konishi M (1986) Selectivity for interaural time difference in the owl's midbrain. J Neurosci 6:3413–3422

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H (1989) Peering in barn owls. In: Erber J, Menzel R, Pflueger HJ, Todt D (eds) Neural mechanisms of behavior. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 238–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H (1990) Receptive fields of neurons in the owl's auditory brainstem change dynamically. Eur J Neurosci 2:949–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H, Frost B (1993) Disparity-sensitive cells in the owl have a characteristic disparity. Nature 364:796–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H, Schaeffel, F (1991) Barn owls (Tyto alba) use accommodation as a distance cue. J Comp Physiol A 169:515–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H, Takahashi TT, Konishi M (1987) Representation of interaural time difference in the central nucleus of the barn owl's inferior colliculus. J Neurosci 7:3105–3116

    Google Scholar 

  • Wathey J, Pettigrew JD (1989) Quantitative analysis of the retinal ganglion cell layer and optic nerve of the barn owl (Tyto alba). Brain Behav Evol 33:279–292

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, H., Frost, B. Binocular responses of neurons in the barn owl's visual Wulst. J Comp Physiol A 174, 661–670 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192715

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192715

Key words

Navigation