Skip to main content
Log in

Midbrain auditory sensitivity in toads of the genus Bufo (amphibia — bufonidae) with different vocal repertoires

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

South American male toads Bufo chilensis emit a release call in contact with other individuals and a soft amplectic call, B. spinulosus males emit a release call while isolated in breeding areas, and B. arenarum produces a release call plus an intense mating call. Release calls of the 3 species measure 72–86 dB SPL RMS at 20 cm in front of the animal and the mating call of B. arenarum is 84–87 dB SPL at 4 m.

Audiograms obtained with multiunit recordings in the torus semicircularis (TS) show a low frequency region (LFR), centered at 352, 356 and 491 Hz, and a high frequency region (HFR), centered at 1199, 1161 and 1423 Hz, in B. chilensis, B. spinulosus and B. arenarum, respectively. Center frequencies (CFs) in the HFR are in gross correspondence with average dominant frequencies (DFs) of the vocalizations of these species. Best thresholds (BTs) in the HFR are similar between B. chilensis and B. arenarum while in B. spinulosus average BTs are 10.8 and 13.5 dB higher, respectively. The similar auditory thresholds between B. chilensis and B. arenarum denote a conservative nature of auditory sensitivity among these anura.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AP :

amphibian papilla

BP :

basilar papilla

BT :

best threshold

CF :

center frequency

DF :

dominant frequency

HFR :

high frequency region

LFR :

low frequency region

TS :

torus semi-circularis

SPL :

sound pressure level

References

  • Blair WF (1972) Evidence from hybridization. In: Blair WF (ed) Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ Texas Press, Austin London, pp 196–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LE, Guttman SI (1970) Natural hybridization between the toads Bufo arenarum and Bufo spinulosus in Argentina. Am Midl Nat 83:160–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzoska J, Walkowiak W, Schneider H (1977) Acoustic communication in the grass frog (Rana t. temporaria L.): calls, auditory thresholds and behavioral responses. J Comp Physiol A 118:173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Capranica RR, Frishkopf LS, Nevo E (1973) Encoding of geographic dialects in the auditory system of the cricket frog. Science 182:1272–1275

    Google Scholar 

  • Capranica RR, Moffat AJM (1983) Neurobehavioral correlates of sound communication in anurans. In: Ewert JP, Capranica RR, Ingle D (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 701–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE, Trueb L (1986) Biology of amphibians. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillery CM (1984) Seasonality of two midbrain auditory responses in the treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis, Copeia 1984:844–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubl L, Schneider H (1979) Temperature and auditory thresholds: bio-acoustic studies of the frogs Rana r. ridibunda, Hyla a. arborea and Hyla a. savignyi (Anura, Amphibia). J Comp Physiol 130:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaslow AP, Hetherington TE, Lombard RE (1988) Structure and function of the amphibian middle ear. In: Fritzsch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkowiak W (eds) The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. Wiley, New York, pp 69–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis ER (1978) Comparative aspects of the anuran auditory papillae. Scan Electr Microsc 2:633–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis ER, Lombard ER (1988) The amphibian inner ear. In: Fritzsch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkowiak W (eds) The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. Wiley, New York, pp 93–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis ER, Baird RA, Leverenz EL, Koyama H (1982) Inner ear: Dye injection reveals peripheral origins of specific sensitivities. Science 215:1641–1643

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus-Hills JJ (1973) Comparative aspects of auditory function in Australian anurans. Aust J Zool 21:353–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus-Hills JJ, Johnstone BM (1970) Auditory function, communication, and the brain-evoked response in anuran amphibians. J Acoust Soc Am 47:1131–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard ER, Straughan IR (1974) Functional aspects of anuran middle ear structures. J Exp Biol 61:71–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WF (1972) Evolution of vocalization in the genus Bufo. In: Blair WF (ed) Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ Texas Press, Austin London, pp 196–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat AJM, Capranica RR (1978) Middle ear sensitivity in anurans and reptiles measured by light scattering spectroscopy. J Comp Physiol 127:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohneke R, Schneider H (1979) Effect of temperature upon auditory thresholds in two anuran species, Bombina v. variegata and Alytes o. obstetricans (Amphibia, Discoglossidae). J Comp Physiol A 130:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Narins PM, Zelick R (1988) Effects of noise on auditory processing and behavior. In: Fritzsch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkowiak W (eds) The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. Wiley, New York, pp 511–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Penna M, Veloso A (1981) Acoustical signals related to reproduction in the spinulosus species group of Bufo (Amphibia, Bufonidae). Can J Zool 59:54–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Penna M, Robles L, Vargas C (1986) Auditory responses in the eighth nerve of a mating call-less toad, Bufo chilensis (Amphibia: Bufonidae). Comp Biochem Physiol 84A:625–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts WM, Robles L, Hudspeth AJ (1986) Correlation between the kinetic properties of ionic channels and the frequency of membrane-potential resonance in hair cells of the bullfrog. In: Moore BCJ, Paterson RD (eds) Auditory frequency selectivity. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JGM (1984) Acoustic spacing by breeding males of Uperoleia rugosa (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Z Tierpsychol 57:209–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ, Wilczynski WW (1988) Coevolution of sender and receiver: effect on local mate preference in cricket frogs. Science 240:1786–1788

    Google Scholar 

  • Shofner WP, Feng AS (1981) Post-metamorphic development of the frequency selectivities and sensitivities of the peripheral auditory system of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. J Exp Biol 93:181–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Shofner WP, Feng AS (1984) Quantitative light and scanning electron microscopic study of the developing auditory organs in the bullfrog: Implications on their functional characteristics. J Comp Neurol 224:141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan BK, Wagner WE (1988) Variation in advertisement and release calls, and social influences on calling behavior in the Gulf Coast toad (Bufo valliceps). Copeia 1988:1014–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloso A, Penna M (1981) Interacción genómica en hibridos de Bufo (Amphibia-Bufonidae). Arch Biol Med Exp 14:89

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkowiak W (1980) Sensitivity, range and temperature dependence of hearing in the grass frog and fire-bellied toad. Behav Process 5:363–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkowiak W (1988) Two auditory filter systems determine the calling behavior of the fire-bellied toad: a behavioral and neurophysiological characterization. J Comp Physiol A 164:pp 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkowiak W, Capranica RR, Schneider H (1981) A comparative study of auditory sensitivity in the genus Bufo (Amphibia). Behav Process 6:223–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (1977) The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski WW, Capranica RR (1984) The auditory system of anuran amphibians. Prog Neurobiol 22:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski WW, Zakon HH, Brenowitz EA (1984) Acoustic communication in spring peepers. Call characteristics and neurophysiological aspects. J Comp Physiol A 155:577–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski WW, Resler C, Capranica RR (1988) Tympanic and extratympanic sound transmission in the leopard frog. J Comp Physiol A 161:659–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakon HH, Wilczynski WW (1988) The physiology of the anuran eighth nerve. In: Fritzsch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkowiak W (eds) The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. Wiley, New York, pp 125–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelick R, Narins PM (1985) Temporary threshold shift, adaptation, and recovery characteristics of frog auditory nerve fibers. Hearing Res 17:161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel RG (1968) Effects of temperature, body size, and hybridization on mating calls of toads, Bufo a. americanus and Bufo woodhousii fowleri. Copeia 1968:269–285

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Penna, M., Palazzi, C., Paolinelli, P. et al. Midbrain auditory sensitivity in toads of the genus Bufo (amphibia — bufonidae) with different vocal repertoires. J Comp Physiol A 167, 673–681 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192661

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192661

Key words

Navigation