Summary
The purpose of the present study was to compare the satisfaction rates obtained for vacuum constriction devices with those achieved using intracavernous pharmacologic injections in a group of patients afflicted with erectile dysfunction. The subjects were stratified into three groups: group 1 failed to achieve an adequate erection on pharmacologic injection, group 2 achieved satisfactory erection following pharmacologic injection, and group 3 was left untreated. All patients were given a vacuum constriction device. We assessed their satisfaction using a questionnaire. The data suggest high satisfaction rates in all three groups. Of particular interest was that over half of the patients who had successfully been treated with pharmacologic injections switched to the vacuum constriction device at the end of the study. The data indicate high levels of patient satisfaction with the vacuum constriction devices, even among subjects in whom prior alternative impotence therapy had been successful.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Meinhardt W, Kropman RF, Lycklama a Nijeholt AAB, Zwartendijk J (1990) Skin necrosis caused by use of negative pressure device for erectile impotence. J Urol 144:983
Nadig Pw, Ware JC, Blumoff R (1986) Noninvasive device to produce and maintain an erection-like state. Urology 27:126–131
Sidi AA, Becher EF, Zhang G, Lewis JH (1990) Patient acceptance of and satisfaction with an external negative pressure device for impotence. J Urol 144:1154–1156
Sidi AA, Reddy PK, Chen KK (1988) Patient acceptance of and satisfaction with vasoactive intracavernous pharmacotherapy for impotence. J Urol 140:293–294
Turner LA, Althof SE, Levine SB, Tobias TR, Kursh ED, Bodner D, Resnick MI (1990) Treating erectile dysfunction with external vacuum devices: impact upon sexual, psychological and marital functioning. J Urol 144:79–82
Witherington R (1989) Vacuum constriction device for management of erectile impotence. J Urol 141:320–322
Witherington R (1987) External aids for treatment of impotence. J Urol Nursing 6:10–16
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gould, J.E., Switters, D.M., Broderick, G.A. et al. External vacuum devices: a clinical comparison with pharmacologic erections. World J Urol 10, 68–70 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186095
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186095