Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of potential gene flow limitation of behavioral adaptation in an aridlands spider

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study investigates the possibility that gene flow underlies the apparently maladaptive behavior of a riparian woodland population of the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta with respect to territorial, foraging, and antipredatory behaviors. I found that other local populations of A. aperta in the vicinity of the riparian woodland habitat are prey-limited and exhibit an “aridlands” phenotype (high aggressiveness in competitive interactions over energy-based territories and a lack of discrimination among potential prey types). The riparian woodland population deviates from surrounding populations in the area in that prey are abundant and this population shows a mixture of “aridlands” and “riparian” (low aggressiveness towards conspecifics and discrimination of prey profitability) phenotypes. Electrophoretic analyses of population subdivision in the area indicate that significant levels of gene flow have occurred, at least, sometime in the past. Drift fence analyses of spider movement futher indicate that there is marked unidirectional movement of spiders each year from the more arid habitats into the riparian woodland. Experimental manipulation of gene flow and predation pressure demonstrates that gene flow restricts adaptation in this habitat: one generation of predation pressure in the absence of gene flow is sufficient to cause a marked shift in spider behavior towards the expected “riparian” phenotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brandon RN (1990) Adaptation and environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks DR, Wiley EO (1988) Evolution as entropy: toward a unified theory of biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheverud JM, Dow MM, Leutenberger W (1985) The quantitative assessment of phylogenctic constraints in comparative analyses. Sexual dimorphism in body weight mong primates. Evolution 39:1335–1351

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1991) Modelling in behavioral ecology. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein P, Riechert SE (1988) Payoffs and strategies in spider territorial contests: ESS-analyses of two ecotypes. Evol Ecol 2:115–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris H, Hopkinson HA (1978) Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick AV, Riechert SE (1989) Population variation in the foraging behavior of a spider: the role of genetics. Ecologia 80:533–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Davies NB (1981) An introduction to behavioural ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1987) The shape of optimality. In: Dupee J (ed) The latest on the best: essays on evolution and optimality. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe CH (1964) The vertebrates of Arizona. University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1978) Optimization theory in evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9:13–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Riechert SE (1984) A conflicting tendency model of spider agonistic behaviour: hybrid-pure population line comparisons. Anim Behav 32:564–578

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken GF, Wilkinson GS (1988) Allozyme techniques and kinship assessment in bats. In: Kunz TH (ed) Behavioral and ecological techniques for research on bats. Smithsonian Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran NA (1991) Phenotype fixation and genotypic diversity in the complex life cycle of the aphid Pemphigus getae. Evolution 45:957–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JB, Weir S, Cockerham CC (1983) Estimation of the coan-cestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics 105:767–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE (1978) Energy-based territoriality in populations of the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch). Symp Zool Soc London 42:211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE (1981) The consequences of being territorial: spiders, a case study. Am Nat 117:871–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE (1991) Prey abundance versus diet breadth in a spider desert test system. Evol Ecol 5:327–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE (1993a) The evolution of behavioral phenotypes: lessons learned from divergent spider populations. Adv Anim Behav 22:130–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE (1993b) A test for phylogenetic constraints on behavioral adaptation in a spider system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:343–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE, Hedrick AV (1990) Levels of predation and genetically based anti-predatory behavior in the spider, Agelenopsis aperta. Anim Behav 40:679–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE, Maynard Smith J (1989) Genetic analyses of two behavioural traits linked to individual fitness in the desert spider, Agelenopsis aperta. Anim Behav 37:624–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander RK, Smith MH, Yand SY, Johnson WE, Johnson JB (1971) Biochemical polymorphisms and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old-field mouse. Stud Genet Univ Tex Publ 7103:49–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1985a) Gene flow in natural populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:393–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1985b) Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution 39:53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M, Arter HE (1991) Spatial autocorrelation methods in population genetics. Am Nat 138:499–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Oden NL (1978) Spatial autocorrelation in biology. II. Some biological implications and four applications of evolutionary and ecological interest. Biol J Linn Soc 10:229–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE (1987) Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants. In: Hecht MK, Wallace B, Prance GT (eds) Evolutionary biology. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL, Selander RB (1981) Biosys-1: A computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in genetics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Valen L Van (1973) A new evolutionary law. Evol Theor 1:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Valen L Van (1976) Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25:233–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Via S (1991) The genetic structure of host plant adaptation in a spatial patchwork: demographic variability among reciprocally transplanted pea aphid clones. Evolution 45:827–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Via S, Lande R (1985) Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39:505–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanntorp H-E, Brooks DR, Nilsson T, Nylin S, Ronquist F, Stearns SC, Wedell N (1990) Phylogenetic approaches in ecology. Oikos 57:119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riechert, S.E. Investigation of potential gene flow limitation of behavioral adaptation in an aridlands spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32, 355–363 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183792

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183792

Keywords

Navigation