Skip to main content
Log in

Reaction to intramural collagen implantation in rabbit bladder

  • Main Topic
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endoscopic correction of vesicoureterorenal reflux in children has limitations, especially with respect to the substance placed beneath the ureterovesical junction. Since TeflonR injection was followed by granulomatous reactions in canine models, alternative substances are being sought. One of the most promising seems to be glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen, which has been used in adult and pediatric urology. In seven rabbits glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen was used to investigate the acute reaction of the bladder wall. In addition, subcutaneous and muscular deposits were made to investigate the reaction of these tissues to ZyplastR injection. In correctly administered cross-linked collagen deposits in the rabbit bladder, only a few polymorphonuclear cells were seen around the eosinophilic substance in hematoxylineosin slides. The chloroacetate esterase reaction was used to confirm this finding. There was edema around the implants but only a few macrophages were seen. If ulceration after collagen implantation takes place, a definite inflammatory reaction should follow, accompanied by marked eosinophilia. Only sparse foreign-body giant cells were found even in bladders where ulceration of the collagen deposit had taken place. After collagen implantation into hind-leg muscle severe necrosis was documented after 7 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birmingham Reflux Study Group (1987) Prospective trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of severe vesicoureteric reflux in children: five years' observation. Br Med J 295: 237–241

    Google Scholar 

  2. Canning AD, Gearhart JP (1989) Limitations and alternatives to endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux with polytef paste. Pediatr Surg Int 4: 149–153

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kohri K, Kaneko S, Umekawa T, Akiyama T, Esa A, Kurita T (1989) Long-term results and curative mechanisms of vesicoureteral reflux by endoscopic injection of blood. Urology 34: 258–261

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeLustro F, Smith S, Sundsmo J, Salem G, Kincaid S, Ellingsworth L (1987) Reaction to injectable collagen: results in animal models and clinical use. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 79: 581–594

    Google Scholar 

  5. Malizia AA Jr, Reiman HM, Myers RP, Sande JR, Barham SS, Benson RC Jr, Dewanjee MK, Utz WJ (1984) Migration and granulomatous reaction after periurethral injection of polytef (Teflon). JAMA 251: 3277–3281

    Google Scholar 

  6. Olbing H (1984) Vesiko-uretero-renaler Reflux (VUR) und Harnwegsinfekt (HWI). Krankenhausarzt 57: 672–679

    Google Scholar 

  7. Puri P, O'Donnell B (1987) Endoscopic correction of grades IV and V primary vesicoureteric reflux: six to 30 month follow-up in 42 ureters. J Pediatr Surg 22: 1087–1091

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ringert RH, Wilke-Kirschberger K, Hartung R (1986) Was ist gesichert in der Therapie des versikoureterorenalen Refluxes im Kindesalter? Krankenhausarzt 59: 290–294

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schulman C, Simon J, Pamart D, Abni F (1987) Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Urol 138: 950–951

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: R.-H. Ringert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ringert, R.H., Mlynek, M.L. & Zöllner, G. Reaction to intramural collagen implantation in rabbit bladder. Pediatr Surg Int 6, 263–265 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178633

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178633

Key words

Navigation