Abstract
The basis of keloid formation and its subsequent behavior, the very high incidence of recurrence after resection, and other forms of treatment are not fully understood. Keloids still remain a dilemma in plastic surgery. Analyzing the etiopathogenesis of keloids in a large number of patients in Ghana and in Poland led to a concept of keloid triad hypothesis (KTH). This is defined as a group of three etiologic factors which must simultaneously coexist and interact for keloids to form. The etiological factors are: genetic links; bacterial, viral or any type of infective agent; type of surgery - sutures, tension of suture lines, location of sutures in relationship to the body skin lines of tension; etc. At least three of these factors must be present, inter-correlate, in order to form a keloid. These factors have been sub-divided into two groups - major (or main) and minor (or auxiliary) and are analyzed in this paper. In each situation at least one major factor must be present in order for a keloid to form.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agbenorku PT (1992) Evaluation of preventive methods and treatment of keloids. Ph. D. Dissertation, Medical Faculty of Wroclaw Medical Academy, Wroclaw, Poland, November 1992
Crikelair GF, Ju DMC, Cosman B (1977) Scars and keloids. In: Reconstructive plastic surgery. Saunders 1:413–441
Datubo-Brown DD (1990) Keloids: a review of the literature. Br J Plast Surg 43:70–77
Harvey-Kemble JV (1988) The management of scars, hypertrophic scars and keloids. Surg Int 54:1286–1289
Robinson JK (1986) Scar formation problems. In: Fundamentals of skin biopsy. Year Book Medical Publishers, pp 97–100
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agbenorkul, P.T., Kus, H. & Myczkowski, T. The keloid triad hypothesis (KTH): a basis for keloid etiopathogenesis and clues for prevention. Eur J Plast Surg 18, 301–304 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178546
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178546