Abstract
Four types of aggravated opening utterances (insult, command, accusation, refusal without a reason) and four types of mitigated opening utterances (request, indication of shared responsibility, reaffirmation, and refusal with a reason) were investigated. Ordinary social actors rated each of the mitigated opening utterances higher than aggravated opening utterances on specific appropriateness, general appropriateness, and effectiveness. Hence, the type of opening employed to initiate an argumentative episode influences judgments of appropriateness and effectiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, I.: 1973, ‘Reciprocity of Interpersonal Exchange’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 3, 249–261.
Askam, J.: 1982, ‘Telling Stories’, Sociological Review 30, 555–573.
Benoit, P. J.: 1982, The Naive Social Actor's Concept of Argument, paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Louisville, KY.
Benoit, P. J.: 1986, ‘Orientation to Face in Everyday Argument’, in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, and C. A. Willard (eds.), Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches, Dordrecht: Foris.
Benoit, P. J. and W. L. Benoit: in press, ‘To Argue or Not to Argue: How Real People Get In and Out of Interpersonal Arguments’, in J. Schuetz and R. Trapp (eds.), Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede, Prospect Heights: Waveland.
Benoit, P. J. and W. L. Benoit: 1989, ‘Accounts of Failures and Acclaims of Successes in Arguments, in B. E. Gronbeck (ed.), Spheres of Argument, Annandale, SCA, pp. 551–557.
Brown, P. and S. Levinson: 1978, ‘Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena’, in E. N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–311.
Canary, D. J. and B. H. Spitzberg: 1987, ‘Appropriateness and Effectiveness Perceptions of Conflict Strategies’, Human Communication Research 14, 93–118.
Crawford, J. R.: 1977, ‘Utterance Rules, Turn-taking, and Attitudes in Enquiry Openers’, IRAL 15, 279–298.
Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1983, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discourse, Dordrecht: Foris.
Gibb, J.: 1961, ‘Defensive Communication’, Journal of Communication 11, 141–148.
Gottman, J. M.: 1979, Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations, New York: Academic Press.
Gouldner, A. W.: 1960, ‘The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement’, American Sociological Review 25, 161–179.
Hample, D. and J. M. Dallinger: 1987, ‘Individual Differences in Cognitive Editing Standards’, Human Communication Research 14, 123–144.
Hocker, J. and W. Wilmot: 1985, Interpersonal Conflict (2nd ed.), Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown.
Jackson, S. and S. Jacobs: 1980, ‘Structure of Conversational Argument: Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 60, 251–265.
Jacobs, S. and S. Jackson: 1982, ‘Conversational Argument: A Discourse Analysis’, in J. R. Cox and C. A. Willard (eds.), Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press, pp. 154–183.
Krivonos, P. D. and M. L. Knapp: 1975, ‘Initiating Communication: What Do You Say When You Say Hello?’ Central States Speech Journal 26, 115–125.
Labov, W. and D. Fanshel: 1977, Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation, New York: Academic Press.
Labov, W. and J. Waletsky: 1967, ‘Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience’, in J. Helm (ed.), Essays on the Visual and Verbal Arts, Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 12–44.
Larson, C. E., P. Backlund, M. Redmond, and A. Barbour: 1978, Assessing Functional Communication, Falls Church: SCA.
Laver, P. D. M. H.: 1981, ‘Linguistic Routines and Politeness in Greeting and Parting’, in F. Coulmas (ed.), Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Situations and Prepatterned Speech, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 289–304.
Pomerantz, A.: 1984, ‘Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes’, in J. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.
Putnam, L. and C. E. Wilson: 1982, ‘Communicative Strategies in Organizational Conflict: Reliability and Validity of a Measurement Scale’, in M. Burgoon (ed.), Communication Yearbook 6, Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 629–652.
Ryave, A. L.: 1978, ‘On the Achievement of a Series of Stories’, in J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, New York: Academic Press, pp. 113–132.
Schegloff, E.: 1968, ‘Sequencing in Conversational Openings’, American Anthropologist 70, 1075–1095.
Schiffrin, D.: 1977, ‘Opening Encounters’, American Sociological Review 42, 679–691.
Sillars, A. L., S. F. Coletti, D. Perry, and M. A. Rogers: 1982, ‘Coding Verbal Conflicts: Non-verbal and Perceptual Correlates of the “Avoidance-distributive-integrative” Distinction’, Human Communication Research 9, 83–95.
Spitzberg, B. H. and W. R. Cupach: 1984, Interpersonal Communication Competence, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Trapp, R.: 1983, ‘Generic Characteristics of Argumentation in Everyday Discourse’, in D. Zarefsky, M. O. Sillars, and J. Rhodes (eds.), Argument in Transition, Annandale: SCA, pp. 516–530.
Wiemann, J. M. and P. Backlund: 1980, ‘Current Theory and Reseach in Communicative Competence’, Review of Educational Research 50, 185–199.
Willard, C. A.: 1979, The Better Part of Valor: How Arguments “Simmer Down” and Arguers Beat Retreats, paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Minneapolis, MN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benoit, W.L., Benoit, P.J. Aggravated and mitigated opening utterances. Argumentation 4, 171–183 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175421
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175421