Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comment on Supernak's critique of transport modelling

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal Supernak (1983a) advanced a forceful critique of contemporary urban transport modelling. This note re-considers some of the issues discussed by Supernak, but from a different philosophical point of view. The resultant analysis of contemporary modelling differs importantly form Supernak's and leads to a different set of prescriptions for the reformation of the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, W., 1968. Predicting best with imperfect data, Journal American Institute of Planners, 24(4): 248–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, S.T., 1977. Transportation planning: is there a road ahead?, Traff Engng Control. 18: 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., 1979. Progress, success and failure in urban modelling, Environment and Planning A 11: 863–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, M.J. & Golob, T.F. 1972. A critique of entropy and gravity in travel forecasting, in G.F. Newell (ed.) Traffic Flow and Transportation, Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M., 1974. Structure of passenger travel demand models, Transpn Res Rec. 526.

  • Bhaskar, R., 1975. A Realist Theory of Science, Leeds Books, Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, P. & Hanson, S., 1982. The analysis of travel as an example of complex human behaviour in spatially constrained situations: definition and measurement issues, Transpn Res. 16A: 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florian, M.A. (ed.), 1976. International Symposium on Traffic Equilibrium Methods, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florian, M.A. (ed.), 1981. Frontiers in Transportation Equilibrium and Supply Models: An International Symposium, Transpn Res. 14 B, 1/2.

  • Florian, M.A. & Nguygen, S., 1976. An application and validation of equilibrium trip assignment methods, Transpn Sci. 10: 374–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggie, I.G., 1978. Putting behaviour into behavioural models of travel choice, J Opl Res Soc. 29: 541–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A., 1979. Urban transport planning — the changing emphasis, Socio-Econ Plang Sci. 13: 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., 1980. The Philosophy of Social Research, Longman, Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.B., 1973. Requiem for large scale models, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 39: 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis, S., Anderson, A., Carbone, R., Fildes, R., Hibon, M., Lewandowski, R., Newton, J., Parzen, E. & Winkler, R., 1982. The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition, Journal of Forecasting, 1: 111–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis, S. & Hibon, M., 1979. Accuracy of forecasting: An empirical investigation, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A 142(2): 97–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manheim, M.L., 1973. Practical implications of some fundamental properities of travel demand models. Highway Res. Rec. 422.

  • Manheim, M.L., 1981. What do we want from travel demand analysis?, in D. Banistar and P. Hall (eds), Transport and Public Policy Planning, Mansell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J., 1978. Mathematical modelling: the error of our ways, Traff Engng Control. 19: 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, R.A., 1979a. Understanding urban models versus understanding cities, Environment and Planning A 11: 853–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, R.A., 1979b. Philosophical basis of the critique of urban modelling: a reply to Wilson, Environment and Planning A 11: 1055–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, R.A., 1982. Explanation in economic geography: abstraction versus generalization, Progress in Human Geography 6(1): 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supernak, J., 1983a. Transportation modelling: lessons from the past and tasks for the future. Transpn. 12: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supernak, J., 1983b. Travel time budget: a critique, in S. Carpenter and P. Jones (eds), Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis, Gower, Hants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supernak, J., 1984. International exchange of transport research: some methodological and ethical aspects, in P. Baron and H. Nuppnau (eds), Research for Transport Policies in a Changing

  • World, Proc. World Conference on Transport Research.

  • Webber, M.J., 1981. Operational models in urban planning, Environment and Planning A 13: 763–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, M.J., 1984. Explanation, Prediction and Planning: the Lowry Model, Pion, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Transport Studies Group, Polytechnic of Central London, 35, Marylebone Road, NW1 5LS, London

    John Polak

Authors
  1. John Polak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Polak, J. A comment on Supernak's critique of transport modelling. Transportation 14, 63–72 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172467

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172467

Keywords

Search

Navigation