Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electrophysiology and perimetry in acute retrobulbar neuritis

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eighteen patients with acute retrobulbar neuritis were examined by visual field analysis and electroophthalmological recordings. The visual fields were measured to 30° with the automatic perimeter Octopus 201. The pattern-evoked cortical potential showed an increased P-100 latency followed by a decrease in 12 patients during the first two weeks of the disease. This latency change cannot be explained by remyelinization. The positive component of the pattern ERG (P-50) was reduced in all acutely affected eyes in comparison with the fellow eye. During recovery, the amplitude of the positive PERG component increased to normal, but remained slightly reduced in comparison with the response from the fellow eyes. Thirteen patients out of 18 were clinically and electrophysiologically diagnosed as having unilateral retrobulbar neuritis. However, static perimetry showed paracentral scotomas in the fellow eye in 5 cases. Recovery of the severely affected eye was accompanied by complete normalization of the visual field in the fellow eye. Thus static perimetry seems to be a more sensitive test than even the visual evoked potentials for detecting lesions in the visual pathway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glaser JS. Optic neuritides. In: Duane TD, Jaeger EA, eds. Clinical ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Harper & Row, 1986; 2, 5: 43–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Percy AK, Nobrega FT, Kurland LT. Optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis: An epidemiologic study. Arch Ophthalmol 1972; 87; 136–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taub RG, Rucker CW. The relation of retrobulbar neuritis to multiple sclerosis. Am J Ophthalmol 1954; 37: 393–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley WG, Whitty WM. Acute optic neuritis: Prognosis for development of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1968; 31: 10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ormerod EC, Miller DH, McDonald WI, du Boulay EPGH, Kendall BE, Moseley IF, Johnson G, Tofts PS, Halliday AM, Bronstein AM, Scaravilli F, Harding AE, Barnes D, Zilkkha KJ. The role of NMR imaging in the assessment of multiple sclerosis and isolated neurological lesions: A quantitative study. Brain 1987; 110: 1579–616.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J. Delayed visual evoked responses in optic neuritis. Lancet 1972; 1: 982–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J. Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br Med J 1973; 4: 661–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meienberg O, Flammer J, Ludin H-P. Subclinical visual defects in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 1982; 227: 125–13.

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Dalen JTW, Spekreijse H. Comparison of visual field examinations and visual evoked cortical potentials in multiple sclerosis patients. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1981; 27: 139–46.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fiorentini A, Maffei L, Pirchio M, Spinelli D, Porciatti V. The ERG in response to alternating gratings in patients with disease of the peripheral visual pathways. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 21: 490–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arden GB, Vaegan, Hogg CR. Clinical and experimental evidence that the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) is generated in more proximal retinal layers than the focal electroretinogram (FERG). Ann NY Acad Sci 1982; 388: 580–601.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berdjis H, Gedeon B, Staerk N, Jacobi G. Muster-ERG und -VECP nach Optikusneuritis im Kindesalter. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1984; 184: 533–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Plant GT, Hess RF, Thomas SJ. The pattern evoked electroretinogram in optic neuritis. Brain 1986; 109: 469–90.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sherman J. Simultaneous pattern-reversal electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in disease of the macula and optic nerve. Ann NY Acad Sci 1982; 388: 214–26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Celesia GG, Kaufman D: Pattern ERGs and visual evoked potentials in maculopathies and optic nerve diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 726–35.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McAlpine D. Course and prognosis. In: McAlpine D, Lumsden C, Acheson ED, eds. Multiple sclerosis, a reappraisal. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1972; 197–225.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Arden GB, Carter RM, Hogg CR, Siegel IM, Margolis S. A gold foil electrode: Extending the horizons for clinical electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979; 18: 421–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hess RF, Baker Jr CL. Human pattern-evoked electroretinogram. J. Neurophysiol 1984; 51: 939–51.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Berninger TA. The pattern electroretinogram and its contamination. Clin Vis Sci 1986; 1: 185–90.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gloor B, Schmied U, Faessler A. Glaukomgesichtsfelder Analyse von Octopus-Verlaufsbeobachtungen mit einem statistischen Programm. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1980; 177: 423–35.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berninger TA, Schuurmans RP. Spatial tuning of the pattern ERG across temporal frequency. DOC Ophthalmol 1985; 61: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Holder GE. Significance of abnormal pattern electroretinography in anterior visual pathway dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol 1987; 71: 161–71.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Drasdo N, Cox W, Thompson DA: The effects of image degradation on retinal illuminance and pattern responses to checkerboard stimuli. Doc Ophthalmol 1987; 66: 267–73.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Harding GFA, Wright CE. Visual evoked potentials in acute optic neuritis. In: Hess RF, Plant GT eds. Optic neuritis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1985; 230–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institute for Physiological and Clinical Research, Bad Nauheim/University Eye Hospital, Frankfurt I Main, FRG

    T. A. Berninger

  2. University Eye Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, FRG

    W. Heider

Authors
  1. T. A. Berninger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Heider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berninger, T.A., Heider, W. Electrophysiology and perimetry in acute retrobulbar neuritis. Doc Ophthalmol 71, 293–305 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170978

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170978

Keywords

Search

Navigation