Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prospective evaluation of thallium-201 reinjection in single-vessel coronary patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty-two patients with single-vessel left anterior descending coronary artery disease were investigated by means of dipyridamole stress thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, using single photon emission tomography (SPET), 1 week before and 2–5 weeks after coronary bypass surgery. The dose of dipyridamole was 0.56 mg/kg, and the injected activity of 201T1 was 74 MBq. Before surgery, and after completion of the redistribution study, a further 37 MBq of 201T1 was injected. Ten minutes and 1 h later, repeated SPET imaging were performed. SPET images were evaluated both subjectively and semiquantitatively, using a five-grade segmental defect score system, with higher scores for more severe perfusion defects. Before surgery, the 3-h redistribution images revealed complete or partial persistence of the perfusion defects in all patients. On the images taken 10 min after reinjection, these defects were completely filled in four cases, and partially filled in ten cases. Further positive changes were observed on the 1-h post-reinjection images in four cases. Three of the 1-h post-reinjection images exhibited a paradox redistribution. The stress images after surgery corresponded well to the 201T1 distribution on the preoperative 1-h post-reinjection images in 11 cases. The average of the segmental defect severity scores was 17.0 after stress, 10.1 at rest, 7.1 10 min after reinjection and 6.4 1 h after reinjection. After surgery, the average of both the post-stress and the 3-h redistribution scores was 3.1. The correlation coefficients between the segmental scores of the postoperative resting study and the preoperative 3-h resting and the 10-min and 1-h post-reinjection studies were 0.72, 0.69 and 0.78, respectively. It is concluded that post-reinjection 201T1 images before surgery are good predictors of myocardial perfusion after revascularization. The best results are obtained if imaging is performed 1 h after reinjection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kiat H, Berman DS, Maddahi J, De Yang L, Van Train K, Rozanski A, Friedman J. Late reversibility of tomographic myocardial thallium 201-defects: an accurate marker of myocardial viability. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12:1456–1463.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mori T, Minamiji K, Kurogane H, Ogawa K, Yoshida Y. Rest-injected thallium-201 imaging for assessing viability of severe asynergic regions. J Nucl Med 1991; 32:1718–1724.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pieri P, Abraham SA, Katayama H, Yasuda T. Thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy: single injection, reinjection, or 24-hour delayed imaging? J Nucl Med 1990; 1390–1396.

  4. Goldstein RA. Wanted: dead or alive — the search for markers of myocardial viability (editorial comment). J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:486–488.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dilsizian V, Rocco TP, Freedman NM, Leon MB, Bonow RO. Enhanced detection of ischemic but viable myocardium by the reinjection of thallium after stress-redistribution imaging. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tamaki N, Ohtani H, Yonekura Y, Nohara R, Kambara H, Kawai C, Hirata K, Ban T, Konishi J. Significance of fill-in after thallium-201 reinjection following delayed imaging: comparison with regional wall motion and angiographic findings. J Nucl Med 1990; 31:1617–1623.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cuocolo A, Pace L, Ricciardelli B, Chiraiello M, Trimarco B, Salvatore M. Identification of viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: comparison of thallium-201 scintigraphy with reinjection and technetium-99m-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile. J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 505–511.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ohtani H, Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, Mohiuddin IH, Hirata K, Ban T, Konishi J. Value of thallium-201 reinjection after delayed SPECT imaging for predicting reversible ischemia after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66:394–399.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alderman EL, Fischer LD, Litwin P, Kaiser GC, Myers WO, Maynard C, Levine F, Schloss M. Results of coronary artery surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function (CASS). Circulation 1983; 68:785–795.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pigott JD, Kouchoukos NT, Oberman A, Cutter GR. Late results of surgical and medical therapy for patients with coronary artery disease and depressed ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5:1036–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rahimtoola SH. The hibernating myocardium [editorial]. Am Heart J 1989; 117:211–221.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schwaiger M, Hicks R. The clinical role of metabolic imaging of the heart by positron emission tomography. J Nucl Med 1991;32:565–578.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy PL, Corbett JR, Kulkarni PV, Wolfe CL, Jansen DE, Hansen CL, Buja LM, Parkey RW, Willerson JT. Iodine-123-phenylpentadecanoic acid myocardial scintigraphy: usefulness in the identification of myocardial ischaemia. Circulation 1986; 74:1007–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eichstadt H. Cardiovascular imaging in the nineties. In: Reiber JHC, van der Wall EE, eds. Cardiovascular nuclear medicine and MRI. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1992:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ter-Pogossian MM, Klein MS, Markham J, Roberts S, Sobel BE. Regional assessment of myocardial metabolic integrity in vivo by positron emission tomography with C-11-labeled palmitate. Circulation 1980; 61:242–255.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, Salcedo EE, Go RT, Saha G, Beachler A. Identification of ischemic and hibernating myocardium: feasibility of post-exercise F-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991; 22:100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gropler RJ, Bergmann SR. Myocardial viability — What is the definition? [Editorial]. J Nucl Med 1991; 32:10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoeflin F, Roesler H, Hopf M, Ledermann H, Noelpp U, Hugo S, Weinreich R. Routine detection of nonperfused but viable (hibernating or stunned) myocardium after recent infarction with 18-F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose using a gamma camera. In: Schmidt HAE, Chambron J, eds. Nuclear medicine. Quantitative analysis in imaging and function. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1990:254–256.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pitt B, Strauss HW. Myocardial imaging in the noninvasive evaluation of patients with suspected ischemic heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1976; 37:797–806.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pohost GM, Zir LM, Moore RH, McKusick KA, Guiney TE, Beller GA. Differentiation of transiently ischemic from infarcted myocardium by serial imaging after a single dose of thallium-201. Circulation 1977; 55:294–302.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Blood DK, McCarthy DM, Sciacca RR, Cannon PJ. Comparison of single dose and double dose thallium-201 for the detection of coronary artery disease and prior myocardial infarction. Circulation 1978; 58:777–788.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oxelbark S, Mannting F, Morgan MG, Henze A. Revascularization of infarcted myocardium. Effect on myocardial perfusion assessed with quantified T1–201 SPECT technique. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 25:89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nienaber CA, Brunken RC, Sherman CT, Yeatman LA, Gambhir SS, Krivokapich J, Demer IL, Ratib O, Child JS, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Metabolic and functional recovery of ischemic myocardium after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18:966–978.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kleipzig H, Standke R, Maul FD, Kaltenbach M, Hör G. Improved left ventricular function and perfusion at rest following transluminal coronary angioplasty. Nuklearmedizin 1991; 30:55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Raff W, Sialer G, von Segesser I, Pfeiffer A, Turina M, von Schultess GK. Perioperative myocardial perfusion scintigraphy at rest with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile before and after coronary bypass operations. Eur J Nucl Med 1991; 18:99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Berger BC, Watson DD, Burwell LR, Crosby IK, Wellons HA, Teates CD, Beller GA. Redistribution of thallium at rest in patients with stable and unstable angina and the effect of coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 1979; 60:1114–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tamaki N, Ohtani H, Yamashita K, Magata Y, Yonekura Y, Nohara R, Kambara H, Kawai C, Hirata K, Ban T, Konishi J. Metabolic activity in the areas of new fill-in after thallium-201 reinjection: comparison with positron emission tomography using fluorine-l8-deoxyglucose. J Nucl Med 1991; 31:1617–1623.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rockett JF, Magill HL, Loveless VL, Murray GL. Intravenous dipyridamole thallium-201 SPECT imaging. Methodology, applications, and interpretations. J Nucl Med 1990; 15:712–725.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Beer SG, Heo J, Iskandrian AS. Dipyridamole thallium imaging. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67:18D–25D.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rijnders AJM, Verzijlbergen JF, Ascoop CAPL. Nuclear cardiology update. Thallium-201 reinjection technique. Petten: Mallinckrodt Medical BV, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: J. Mester

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mester, J., Kósa, I., Lupkovics, G. et al. Prospective evaluation of thallium-201 reinjection in single-vessel coronary patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Eur J Nucl Med 20, 213–218 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170001

Key words

Navigation