Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Keeler Pulsair non-contact tonometry: reliability and reproducibility

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intraocular pressure was evaluated in 414 eyes using Keeler Pulsair tonometry in comparison with values obtained by Goldmann tonometry. No statistically significant differences were found between the two techniques. Landis K statistical analysis was used to evaluate the measurements obtained by two operators in 125 eyes, with the results indicating good reproducibility. In 20 eyes, a statistically significant difference was found between values obtained with patients in the seated vs supine positions, whereas measurements made with subjects' heads in a supported or unsupported position yielded no statistically different values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boles Carenini B, Quaranta AC (1977) L'attendibilità dei mezzi semeiologici nelle diagnosi del glaucoma cronico semplice. Relazione del 58 Congresso SOI, Roma, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buscemi M, Garavaglia A, Capoferri G, Pece A, Nassivera C, Brancato R (1989) Valutazione clinica dello pneumotonometro Pulsair. Ann Ottalmol 115:309–316

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cobbe C, Tosi R, Baravelli S, Tomazzoli L (1990) Determinazione della tensione oculare mediante pneumotonometro in portatori di LAC morbide. Boll Ocul 69 (in press)

  4. Di Bari A, Tonetto C, Brogliatti B (1988) Studio comparativo tra due tonometrie non contact ed il tonometro di Goldmann. Boll Ocul 67 [Suppl 4]:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ducrey N, Geinoz J, Faggioni R (1975) La tonometrie a air. Ophthalmologica 173:446–449

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher JH, Watson PG, Spaeth G (1988) A new handheld air impulse tonometer. Eye 2:238–242

    Google Scholar 

  7. Forbes M, Pico G, Grolman B (1974) A non-contact applanation tonometer. Arch Ophthalmol 91:134–140

    Google Scholar 

  8. Insler MS, Robbins RG (1987) Intraocular pressure by noncontact tonometry with and without soft contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 105:1358–1359

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sorensen PN (1975) The non-contact tonometer, clinical evaluation on normal and diseased eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 53:513–521

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sponsel WE, Kaufman PL, Strinden TI, Depaul KL, Bowes HN, Olander KW, Barnebey HS (1989) Evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair non-contact tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol 67:567–572

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vernon SA (1989) Non-contact tonometry in the postoperative eye. Br J Ophthalmol 73:247–249

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonomi, L., Baravelli, S., Cobbe, C. et al. Evaluation of Keeler Pulsair non-contact tonometry: reliability and reproducibility. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 229, 210–212 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167869

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167869

Keywords

Navigation