Skip to main content
Log in

Fast spin echo MRI and bone scintigraphy in the detection of skeletal metastases

  • Original Articles
  • Musculoskeletal Radiology
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Standard Spin Echo (SE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is known to be a very sensitive method for the detection of bone metastases and in comparison to skeletal scintigraphy, MRI detects more lesions when field of view includes the area of suspicion. However, only with the introduction of new fast SE sequences, have MRI protocols, for the detection of metastases, become rapid enough to make it a potential screening procedure for metastatic disease. Twenty-one patients with a suspicion of carcinomatous bone metastases were evaluated with both conventional T1 weighted (T1w), T2 weighted (T2w) and fast T2w SE (FSE) sequences (thoraco-lumbar spine and pelvis) and whole body bone scintigraphy. Conventional and fast T2w SE sequences detected the same number of lesions while bone scintigraphy detected only 70% of the lesions seen on MRI. However, more importantly, in 11 of the 21 patients bone scintigraphy detected lesions outside the MR field of view, lying in the ribs, skull, scapulae and extremities and in 4 of them, MRI was negative. Our results suggest first that fast SE MRI can replace conventional SE MRI when looking for carcinomatous bone metastases in the axial skeleton, with the advantage of a four to six times reduced acquisition time for fast T2w sequences. However, the limited field of view still limits the usefulness of MRI and whole body bone scintigraphy remains the screening modality for bone metastases. Fast MRI plays an important complementary role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berrettoni BA, Carter JR (1986) Current concepts review. Mechanisms of cancer metastasis to bone. J Bone Joint Surg 68-A: 308–312

    Google Scholar 

  2. Batson OV (1940) The role of the vertebral veins and their role in the spread of metastasis. Ann Surg 112: 138–149

    Google Scholar 

  3. Batson OV (1942) The function of the vertebral veins in metastatic processes. Ann Intern Med 16: 38–45

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vogel III JB, Murphy WA (1988) Bone marrow imaging. Radiology 168: 679–693

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dooms GC, Fisher MR, Hricak H, Richardson M, Crooks LE, Genant HK (1985) Bone marrow imaging: Magnetic resonance studies related to age and sex. Radiology 155: 429–432

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daffner RH, Lupetin AR, Dash N, Deeb ZL, Sefczek RJ, Schapiro RL (1986) MRI in the detection of malignant infiltration of bone marrow. AJR 146: 353–358

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hajek PC, Baker LL, Goobar JE et al. (1987) Focal fat deposition in axial bone marrow: MR characteristics. Radiology 162: 245–249

    Google Scholar 

  8. Porter BA, Shields AF, Olson DO (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow disorders. Radiol clin North Am 24: 269–289

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khurana JS, Rosenthal DI, Rosenberg AE, Mankin HJ (1989) Skeletal metastases in liposarcoma detectable only by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Ortho Rel Res 243: 204–207

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mehta RC, Wilson MA, Merlmann SB (1989) False negative bone scan in extensive metastatic disease: CT and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13 (4): 717–719

    Google Scholar 

  11. Avrahami E, Tadmor R, Dally O, Hadar H (1989) Early MR demonstration of spinal metastases in patients with normal radiographs and CT and radionuclide bone scan. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13 (4): 598–602

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kattapuram SV, Khurana JS, Scott JA, El-Khoury GY (1990) Negative scintigraphy with positive magnetic resonance imaging in bone metastases. Skeletal Radiol 19: 113–116

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bauer R, Van de Flierdt E, Langhammer HR, Allgaver B, Stepan R (1989) Szintigraphie und Kernspintomographie des Skeletts und Knochenmarks. Der Nuklearmediziner 5: 303–320

    Google Scholar 

  14. Algra PR, Bloem JL, Tissing H, Falke TH, Arndt JW, Verboom LJ (1991) Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy. Radiographics 11: 219–232

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kamby C, Guldhammer B, Vejborg I et al. (1987) The presence of tumor cells in bone marrow at the time of first recurrene of breast cancer. Cancer 60: 1306–1312

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bauer R, Van de Flierdt E, Krauss A et al. (1990) Diagnostik von Skelettmetastasen: Vergleich zwischen Skelettszintigraphie und Kernspintomographie. Der Nuklearmediziner 1: 51–59

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H (1986) RARE Imaging: A FAST imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med 3: 823–833

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bohndorf K, Knochenmetastasen (1991) In: Bohndorf K (ed) MR-Tomographie des Skeletts und der peripheren Weichteile. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 71–74

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jones KM, Mulkern RV, Schwartz RB, Oshio K, Barnes PD, Jolesz FA (1992) Fast spin echo MR imaging of the brain and spine: current concepts. AJR 158: 1313–1320

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: G. K. von Schulthess

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haubold-Reuter, B., Duewell, S., Schilcher, B. et al. Fast spin echo MRI and bone scintigraphy in the detection of skeletal metastases. Eur. Radiol. 3, 316–320 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167460

Key words

Navigation