Skip to main content
Log in

Search tactics of a pause-travel predator: adaptive adjustments of perching times and move distances by hawk owls (Surnia ulula)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

After having erected artificial perches of different heights in a clear-cut, I studied the effect of perching height on the allocation of search and pursuit effort of 9 individuals of the hawk owl. Hawk owls are diurnal and locate their small mammal prey visually. Horizontal attack and move distances increased with perching height in most individual cases, as well as across cases. Prey detection and giving-up times increased with perching height in half of the individual cases, but not across cases. Attack and move distances increased with perching time in only a few individual cases, and not across cases. Perching height explained more of the variation in attack and move distances than did perching time. Move distance depended on both preceding and subsequent perching heights. When giving up a perch the owls on average moved slightly farther than the distance predicted if travel distance as well as overlap between successive search areas are to be minimized. When the ground was snow-free, distances of successful attacks tended to be shorter than those of unsuccessful attacks. Moreover, perches from which prey were captured, but not perches from which unsuccessful attacks were launched, tended to be lower than perches which were given up. This may suggest that the predator-prey distance is more critical to the probability of capture than to the probability of detection. Longer horizontal attack distances from higher perches suggest that the size of the area effectively searched around each perch increases with the height of the perch. Therefore, longer giving-up times on higher perches indicate allocation of more search time to larger search areas, and longer moves after giving up or before landing on higher perches indicate avoidance of overlap with the larger search areas of these perches. These adjustments of giving-up time and move distance allow hawk owls to forage efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1981) On optimal predator search. Theor Pop Biol 19:58–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Balgooyen TH (1976) Behavior and ecology of the American kestrel (Falco sparverius L.) in the Sierra Nevada of California. Univ Calif Publ Zool 103:1–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby CJ, Green RE (1980) Foraging behaviour of migrant pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca on temporary territories. J Anim Ecol 49:507–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrkjedal I, Langhelle G (1986) Sex and age biased mobility in hawk owls Surnia ulula. Ornis Scand 17:306–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson A (1985) Prey detection in the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio): an experimental study. Anim Behav 33:1243–1249

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1977) Prey selection and the search strategy of the spotted flycatcher (Muscicapa striata): a field study on optimal foraging. Anim Behav 25:1016–1033

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt RC (1979) The adaptive syndromes of two guilds of insectivorous birds in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Ecol Monogr 49:129–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick JW (1980) Foraging behavior of neotropical tyrant flycatchers. Condor 82:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick JW (1981) Search strategies of tyrant flycatchers. Anim Behav 29:810–821

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith PW (1979) Selection of feeding areas by Senegal kingfishers, Halcyon senegalensis. Z Tierpsychol 49:197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith PW (1983) Use of perches as vantage points during foraging by male and female stonechats, Saxicola torquata. Behaviour 86:215–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen Y (1956) The irruption of hawk owls Surnia ulula (L.) in Fennoscandia 1950–51. Sterna, Opusc Ser Zool 24:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L, Henttonen H (1985) Gradients in density variations of small rodents: the importance of latitude and snow cover. Oecologia 67:394–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1986) On the winter food of the hawk owl Surnia ulula. Fauna Norv, Ser C, Cinclus 9:107–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe NB (1985) Prey detection by intertidally feeding lapwings. Z Tierpsychol 67:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkola H (1983) Owls of Europe. Poyser, Calton

    Google Scholar 

  • Moermond TC (1979) The influence of habitat structure on Anolis foraging behavior. Behaviour 70:147–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno J (1984) Search strategies of wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe) and stonechats (Saxicola torguata): adaptive variation in perch height, search time, sally distance and inter-perch move length. J Anim Ecol 53:147–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg RÅ (1987) Evolution, structure, and ecology of northern forest owls. In: Nero RW, Clark RJ, Knapton RJ, Hamre RH (eds) Biology and conservation of northern forest owls: symposium proceedings. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep RM-142, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp 9–43

  • O'Brien WJ, Evans BI, Browman HI (1989) Flexible search tactics and efficient foraging in saltatory searching animals. Oecologia 80:100–110

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien WJ, Browman HI, Evans BI (1990) Search strategies of foraging animals. Am Sci 78:152–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Pienkowski MW (1983) Changes in the foraging pattern of plovers in relation to environmental factors. Anim Behav 31:244–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkowski BC (1977) Foraging behavior of the eastern bluebird. Wilson Bull 89:404–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1983) Sensory modality: an example of its effect on optimal foraging behavior. Ecology 64:403–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson SK, Holmes RT (1982) Foraging behavior of forest birds: the relationships among search tactics, diet, and habitat structure. Ecology 63:1918–1931

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph SG (1982) Foraging strategies of American kestrels during breeding. Ecology 63:1268–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonerud GA (1980) Hunting strategies of birds which feed on small mammals in boreal forests (in Norwegian). Cand real thesis, University of Oslo

  • Sonerud GA (1986) Effect of snow cover on seasonal changes in diet, habitat, and regional distribution of raptors that prey on small mammals in boreal zones of Fennoscandia. Holarct Ecol 9:33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonerud GA (1988) What causes extended lows in microtine cycles? Analysis of fluctuations in sympatric shrew and microtine populations in Fennoscandia. Oecologia 76:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonerud GA, Nybo JO, Fjeld PE, Knoff C (1987) A case of bigyny in the hawk owl Surnia ulula: spacing of nests and allocation of male feeding effort. Ornis Fenn 64:144–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Temeles EJ (1989) Effect of prey consumption on foraging activity of northern harriers. Auk 106:353–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye A (1988) Foraging behaviour and selection of prey and perches by the buffstreaked chat Oenanthe bifasciata. Ostrich 59:105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye A (1989) A model of search behaviour for the northern wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe (Aves, Turdidae) and other pause-travel predators. Ethology 83:1–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sonerud, G.A. Search tactics of a pause-travel predator: adaptive adjustments of perching times and move distances by hawk owls (Surnia ulula). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30, 207–217 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166705

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166705

Keywords

Navigation