Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 107–114 | Cite as

Correlates of female choice in resource-defending antelope

  • Andrew Balmford
  • A. M. Rosser
  • S. D. Albon
Article

Summary

Where males offer their mates assistance in rearing offspring as well as access to defended resources, female mate choice should be influenced by both male phenotype and resource quality. In contrast, where there is no paternal care the relative importance of choice for male and territory traits is less well understood. We looked at female distribution across male territories in order to assess mate choice criteria in puku Kobus vardoni, and topi Damaliscus lunatus, two antelope where males defend resources but are not involved in parental care. In both species female distribution was correlated with male phenotype as well as the quality of forage and risk of predation on different territories. Male and territory characteristics were intercorrelated, but statistical analysis revealed that male traits, forage quality and predation risk were all significant, independent predictors of female choice in both study species. This is the first demonstration that female choice in mammals might be simultaneously influenced by male phenotype as well as the quality of defended resources.

Keywords

Defend Predation Risk Mate Choice Parental Care Female Mate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Glynn C (1986) Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323:152–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alatalo RV, Glynn C, Lundberg A (1990) Singing rate and mate attraction in the pied flycatcher. Anim Behav 39:601–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson M (1982) Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anthony AJ, Lightfoot CJ (1984) Field determination of age and sex in tsessebe Damaliscus lunatus. S Afr J Wildl Res 14:19–22.Google Scholar
  5. Balmford AP, Blakeman SJ (1991) Horn and body size of topi in relation to a variable mating system. Afr J Ecol 29:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balmford, Read AP (1991) Testing alternative models of sexual selection through female choice. Trends Ecol Evol 6:274–276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Balmford AP, Turyaho M (1992) Predation risk and lek-breeding in an African antelope. Anim Behav (in press).Google Scholar
  8. Bateson PPG (ed) (1983) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Black R (1971) Hatching success in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in relation to changes in behaviour during the parental phase. Anim Behav 19:532–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) (1987) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  11. Breden F, Stoner G (1987) Male predation risk determines female preference in the Trinidad guppy. Nature 329:831–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Catchpole C, Leisler B, Winkler H (1985) Polygyny in the great reed warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus: a possible case of deception. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock TH (1989) Mammalian mating systems. Proc R Soc Lond B 236:339–372.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Clutton-Brock TH, Vincent ACJ (1991) Sex role reversal and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351:58–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Clutton-Brock TH, Green D, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Albon SD (1988) Passing the buck: resource defence, lek-breeding and mate choice in fallow deer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conner J (1989) Older males have higher insemination success in a beetle. Anim Behav 38:503–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Côte IM, Hunte W (1989) Male and female mate choice in the redlip blenny: why bigger is better. Anim Behav 38:78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Digby PGN, Kempton RA (1987) Multivariate analysis of ecological communities. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  19. Downhower JF, Brown L (1980) Mate preferences of female mottled sculpins, Cottus bairdi. Anim Behav 28:728–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncan P (1975) Topi and their food supply. PhD thesis, University of Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  21. Elgar M (1989) Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 64:13–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ewald PW, Rohwer S (1982) Effects of supplemental feeding on timing of breeding, clutch size and polygyny in red-winged blackbirds Agelaius phoeniceus. J Anim Ecol 51:429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ginsberg JR (1989) The ecology of female behaviour and male mating success in the Grevy's zebra. Symp Zool Soc Lond 61:89–110.Google Scholar
  25. Göransson G, von Schantz T, Fröberg I, Helgée A, Wittzell H (1990) Male characteristics, viability and harem size in the pheasant, Phasianus colchicus. Anim Behav 40:89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gordon IJ (1989) Vegetation community selection by ungulates on the isle of Rhum III. Determinants of vegetation community selection. J Appl Ecol 26:65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gosling LM (1991) The alternative mating strategies of male topi, Damaliscus lunatus. Appl Anim Behav Sci 29:107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gosling LM, Petrie M (1990) Lekking in topi: a consequence of satellite behaviour by small males at hotspots. Anim Behav 40:272–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–32.Google Scholar
  30. Holm CH (1973) Breeding sex ratios, territoriality, and reproductive sucess in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Ecology 54:356–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Howard RD (1978a) The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Evolution 32:850–871.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Howard RD (1978b) The influence of male-defended oviposition sites on early embryo mortality in bullfrogs. Ecology 59:789–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes AL, Hughes MK (1982) Male size, mating success and breeding habitat partitioning in the whitespotted sawyer Monochamus scutellatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Oecologia 55:258–263.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes AL, Hughes MK (1985) Female choice of mates in a polygynous insect, the whitespotted sawyer Monochamus scutellatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:385–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jarman PJ, Sinclair ARE (1979) Feeding strategy and the pattern of resource partitioning in ungulates. In: Sinclair ARE, Norton-Griffiths M (eds) Serengeti: dynamics of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 130–163.Google Scholar
  36. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kitchen DW (1974) Social behavior and ecology of the pronghorn. Wildl Monogr 38:1–96.Google Scholar
  38. Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1988) Female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca choose male characteristics in homogeneous habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mills MGL (1984) Prey selection and feeding habitats of the large carnivores of the southern Kalahari. Koedoe (Suppl) 27:281–294.Google Scholar
  40. Møller AP (1988) Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature 332:640–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Møller AP (1990) Male tail length and female mate choice in the monogamous swallow Hirundo rustica. Anim Behav 39:458–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monfort-Braham N (1975) Variations dans la structure sociale du topi Damaliscus korrigum Ogilby au Pare National de l'Aka-gera, Rwanda. Z Tierpsychol 39:332–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Owen-Smith N (1977) On territoriality in ungulates and an evolutionary model. Q Rev Biol 52:1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pleszczynska W (1978) Microgeographic prediction of polygyny in the lark bunting. Science 201:935–937.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Prins HHT, Iason GR (1989) Dangerous lions and nonchalant buffalo. Behaviour 108:262–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reid ML, Weatherhead PJ (1990) Mate-choice criteria of Ipswich sparrows: the importance of variability. Anim Behav 40:538–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reynolds JD, Gross MR (1990) Costs and benefits of female mate choice: is there a lek paradox? Am Nat 136:230–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Riney T (1960) A field technique for assessing physical condition of some ungulates. J Wildl Manage 24:92–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosser AM (1987) Resource defence in an African antelope, the puku (Kobus vardoni). PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  50. Rosser AM (1990) A glandular neckpatch secretion and vocalisation act as signals of territorial status in male puku (Kobus vardoni). Afr J Ecol 28: 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Russel A (1984) Body condition scoring of sheep. In Practice 6:91–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sargent RC (1982) Territory quality, male quality, courtship intrusions and female nest choice in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 30:364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schantz T von, Göransson G, Andersson G, Fröberg I, Grahn M, Helgée A, Wittzell H (1989) Female choice selects for a viability-based male trait in pheasants. Nature 337:166–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simmons RE (1988) Food and the deceptive acquisition of mates by polygnous male harriers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23: 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sinclair ARE (1985) Does interspecific competition or predation shape the African ungulate community? J Anim Ecol 54:899–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith HG, Montgomerie R (1991) Sexual selection and the tail ornaments of North American barn swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thompson S (1986) Male spawning success and female mate choice in the mottled sculpin, Forsterygion varium (Pisces: Tripterygiidae). Anim Behav 34:580–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am Nat 122:765–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 139–179.Google Scholar
  60. Vos A de (1965) Territorial behavior among puku in Zambia. Science 148:1752–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yasukawa K (1981) Male quality and female choice of mate in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Ecology 62:922–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Balmford
    • 1
  • A. M. Rosser
    • 1
  • S. D. Albon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyLarge Animal Research GroupCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations