Abstract
In this paper, it is contended that in order to understand individual student's learning in the complexity of the mathematics classroom it is necessary to examine the events that occur before, during, and after learning. To illustrate, the process by which two children each construct new mathematical meanings is examined in this manner. The detailed analyses of each of these events provides insight into the processes by which individual students construct mathematical meanings in classroom settings. The investigation also reveals that the underlying social norms differ from those found in traditional classes, and that this creates different opportunities for learning. It is contended that it is the differences in the norms that have been established in their respective classes that distinguishes between the events in learning for the two children.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartolini-Bussi M.: 1991, ‘Social interaction and mathematical knowledge’, in F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education 1, 1–16, Psychology of Mathematics Education, Assisi, Italy.
Blumer H.: 1969, ‘Symbolic Interactionism’, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Bruner J.: 1990, ‘Acts of Meaning’, Harvard University Press, Boston.
Cobb P., Wood T., Yackel E., and McNeal B.: 1992, ‘Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis’, American Educational Research Journal 20, 3, 573–604.
Confrey, J.: 1987, ‘The current state of constructivist thought in mathematics education’, paper presented at the Eleventh Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Montreal.
Dewey, J.: updated, ‘Essays in Experimental Logic’, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
Erickson F.: 1982, ‘Taught cognitive learning in its immediate environments: A neglected topic in the anthropology of education’, Anthropology and Education Quarterly 13, 2, 149–180.
Fuson K.: 1992, ‘Research on whole number addition and subtraction’, in D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 243–275.
Kamii C.: 1985, ‘Young Children Reinvent Arithmetic: Implications of Piaget's Theory’, Teachers College Press, Columbia, New York.
Labinowicz E.: 1985, ‘Learning from Children: New Beginnings for Teaching Numerical Thinking’, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA.
McIntosh A., Reys B. and Reys R.: 1992, ‘A proposed framework for examining basic number sense’, For the Learning of Mathematics 12, 3, 2–8, 44.
Murray, H. and Olivier, A.: 1989, ‘A model of understanding two-digit numeration and computation’, in G. Vernaud, J. Rogalski, and M. Artigue (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Psychology of Mathematics Education, Paris, France, (vol. 3) pp. 3–10.
Nicholls J. G.: 1983, ‘Conceptions of ability and achievement motivation: A theory and its implications for education’, in S. G. Paris, G. M. Olsen, and W. H. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and Motivation in the Classroom, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 211–237.
Piaget J.: 1985, ‘The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures’, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Resnick L.: 1987, ‘Education and Learning to Think’, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Rogoff B.: 1990, ‘Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context’, Oxford University Press, New York.
Romberg T.: 1992, ‘Further thoughts on the standards: A reaction to Apple’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 23, 5, 432–437.
Samarapungavan A.: 1992, ‘Children's judgments in theory choice tasks: Scientific rationality in childhood’, Cognition 45, 1–32.
Steffe L. P.: 1983, ‘The teaching experiment methodology in a constructivist research program’. In M. Zweng, T. Green, J. Kilpatrick, H. Pollak, and M. Suydam (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education, Boston: Birkhauser, pp. 469–471.
Steffe L. P., Cobb P. (with von Glasersfeld, E.): 1988, ‘Construction of Arithmetical Meanings and Strategies’, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Treffers A.: 1991, ‘Meeting innumeracy at primary school’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 333–352.
Voigt, J.: 1990, ‘The microethnographical investigation of the interactive constitution of mathematical meaning’, Proceedings of the 2nd Bratislava International Symposium on Mathematics Education, pp. 120–143.
Voigt J.: 1985, ‘Patterns and routines in classroom interaction’, Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 6, 1, 69–118.
Wood T.: 1994, ‘Patterns of interaction and the culture of the mathematics classroom’, in S. Lerman (Ed.), Cultural Perspectives on the Mathematics Classroom, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 149–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this paper was supported by the National Science Foundation (RED 9254939) and while the author was the Snodgrass Scholar in the School of Education Purdue University. The final draft was completed at the Mathematics Education Research Centre, Oxford University. All opinions are those of the author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wood, T. Events in learning mathematics: Insights from research in classrooms. Educ Stud Math 30, 85–105 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163754
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163754