Abstract
Optokinetic sensations of movement have been investigated by means of a moving pattern of stripes presented in the periphery of the visual field. Linear sensations of movement occur. The more peripheral in the visual field the pattern is presented, the more sensitive the retina becomes. Stimuli perpendicular to the horizontal meridian evoke stronger reactions than stimuli presented perpendicular to the vertical meridian. Vertically directed stimuli in the temporal field of vision give rise to more intense sensations than the same stimuli applied to the nasal field. An upward movement of stimulus pattern causes a more pronounced sensation of ‘lift’ than a downward movement. As for horizontal stimulation, sensations are more pronounced when stripes move from temporal to nasal than in the opposite direction. Only stimulation perpendicular to the meridian, either horizontal or vertical, induces sensations of movement. Stimulation in the same direction as these meridians, whether upward or downward for the vertical axis or to the left or the right for the horizontal axis, do not induce linear or circular vection. The results may be of importance in working with monitor screens. The differences between the method routinely used in optokinetic examination and the present stimulus method, are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berthoz A, Pavard B and Young LR (1975) Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linear-vection). Exp Brain Res 23:471–489
Brandt Th, Dichgans J and Koenig E (1973) Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Exp Brain Res 16:476–491
Cohen B (1974) The interaction of visual and vestibular systems. Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vol VI/1, p 482–485, ed by HH Kornhuber, Springer, Berlin
Dichgans J and Brandt Th (1973) Optokinetic motion sickness and pseudo-coriolis effects induced by moving visual stimuli. Acta Otolaryng 76:339–348
Goodenough DR and Oltman PK (1981) The field-dependence construct and interpersonal behavior. Ned Tijdschr Psychol 36:265–273
Henn V, Cohen B and Young LR (1980) Visual-vestibular interaction in motion perception and the generation of nystagmus. Neurosci Res Progr Bull 18:459–651
Hood JD and Lech J (1974) The significance of peripheral vision in the perception of movement. Acta Otolaryng 77:72–79
Hulk J and Rempt F (1983) Vertical optokinetic sensations by limited stimulation of the peripheral field of vision. Ophthalmologica (Basel) 106:97–103
McColgin FH (1960) Movement thresholds in peripheral vision. J Opt Soc Am 50:774–779
Rempt F and Hulk J (1983) Examination of the peripheral field of vision with the waterfall phenomenon (Motion Stop Reverse Illusion). Docum Ophthal 55:351–360
Rempt F, Hoogerheide J and Hoogenboom WPH (1976) Influence of correction of peripheral refractive errors on peripheral static vision. Ophthalmologica (Basel) 173:128–135
Rempt F, Hulk J, Hoogenboom WPH, van den Heuvel ACH and Blom JH (1979) Peripheer dynamisch zien en verticale optokinetische nystagmus. Aeromed Acta 11:33–47
Young LR, Dichgans J, Murphy R and Brandt Th (1973) Interaction of optokinetic and vestibular stimuli in motion perception. Acta Otolaryng 76:24–31
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hulk, J., Rempt, F. Optokinetic sensations evoked by local stimulation of the peripheral retina. Doc Ophthalmol 56, 237–242 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00159075
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00159075