Skip to main content
Log in

A policy-selection/ goal-formulation model for public systems

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to present an analytical framework of analysis of problems relating to public systems. Current optimization models, which originated in the private sector, are not adequate to handle the complexity of the decision making processes in public policy analysis. The proposed model aims at lessening ideological debates over statements of goals, and it emphasizes policy selection through goal redefinitions where both goals and policies are formulated simultaneously. The model is based on an iterative process where consensus over policies is arrived at between the policy maker and the constituents of the public system. The principal feature of the model is that it incorporates political debates and bargains, and provides for the development of insight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckett, John A. Management Dynamics: The New Synthesis. McGraw-Hill Book Co., N.Y., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, George. A Systems View of Planning. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., and W. W. Cooper. Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. N.Y., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrious, Basil, “The Interpenetration of Politics and Planning,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1973.

  • Drake, Alvin W., “Quantitative Models in Public Administration: Some Educational Needs,” in Analysis of Public Systems by A. W. Drake, R. L. Keeney, and P. M. Morse (eds.), The MIT Press, Mass., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Bert F., “Introduction: Current Trends in Problem Solving,” in Problem Solving: Research, Method, and Theory by Benjamin Kleinmuntz (ed.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., N.Y., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamrany, Nake M., “Economic Growth and Environmental Impact: Evaluating Alternatives,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1973.

  • Keeney, Ralph L., and Howard Raiffa, “A Critique of Formal Analysis in Public Decision Making,” in Analysis of Public Systems by A. W. Drake, R. L. Keeney and P. M. Morse (eds.), the MIT Press, Mass., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. “The Science of Muddling Through,” Public Administration Review, Vol. XIX, Spring, 1959.

  • -Lindblom, Charles E. and A. O. Hirschman, “Economic Development, Research and Development, Policy Making: Some Converging Views,” Behavioral Science, Vol. 7, 1962.

  • Mayer, Robert R. Social Planning and Social Change. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruefli, Timothy W., “Shadow Models: Extensions of Management Sciences,” in Computer Simulation Versus Analytical Solution for Business and Economic Models. Gothenberg, Sweden, August 1972.

  • Schultze, Charles L. The Politics and Economics of Public Spending. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David M. The Geography of Social Well-Being in the United States. McGraw-Hill Book Co., N.Y., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripodi, Tony, F. Fellin, and I. Epstein (eds.). Social Program Evaluation. F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc., Itasca, Ill., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Said, K.E. A policy-selection/ goal-formulation model for public systems. Policy Sci 5, 89–100 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155720

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155720

Keywords

Navigation