Skip to main content
Log in

Academic development units and the improvement of teaching

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey of those educational development practices which directors of educational (academic) development units in Australia found most effective in their institutions for the improvement of teaching was conducted in late 1983. The responses are presented and discussed.

Academic staff are one of the targets of educational development. A series of interviews with 100 academic staff of the University of Queensland at about the same time confirmed that the approaches taken by units for improving teaching are approved of by staff. In particular staff recognised and valued the connection between evaluation and development.

The staff development programme at the University of Queensland responded to the expressed needs of staff for specific developmental activities. It is described as one example of a systematic approach to staff development with emphasis on formal workshops/seminar sessions and evaluation of teaching. Practicalities and problems are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee (AVCC) Working Party (1981). Academic Staff Development. AVCC Occasional Papers, No. 4, Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bess, James L. (1982). “The motivation to teach: meanings, messages, and morals,” in J. L. Bess (ed.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning: Motivating Professors to Teach Effectively, No. 10. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, John A. and Anwyl, John (1982). Attitudes of Australian Academics to Staff Development. Research Working Paper No. 82.5, University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education.

  • Boud, David and de Rome, Elizabeth (1983). “What counts: Academics' perceptions of the promotions system,” in. I. Moses (ed.), Tertiary Education in the Eighties: Paths to Reward and Growth. Research and Development in Higher Education Vol. 6, Sydney: Herdsa, pp. 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, Dietrich, Dunker, Elke, and de Winter Hebron, Chris (1979/80). “A German staff training unit assesses its induction course,” The Bulletin for Educational Research 18: 29–36 (Newcastle Polytechnic Education Research Working Party).

  • Cannon, Robert A. (1983). “The professional development of Australian university teachers: An act of faith?” Higher Education 12: 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, John A. (1979). Determining Faculty Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Geoff and Roe, Ernest (1979). “Australia - In service, lip service and unobtrusive pragmatism,” in D. C. B. Teather (ed.), Staff Development in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page, pp. 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genn, J. M. (1982). The Pursuit of Excellence in University Teaching in Australia. Sydney: HERDSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewton, E. (1979). “A strategy for promoting curriculum development in universities,” Studies in Higher Education 4(1): 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Richard (1982). Academic Development Units in Australian Universities and Colleges of Advanced Education. Canberra: Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission, Evaluative Studies Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, Abram G. (1983). “Faculty development practices in Canadian Universities,” The Canadian Journal of Higher Education 13(2): 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson-Rose, J. and Menges, R. J. (1981). “Improving college teaching: A critical review of research,” Review of Educational Research 51(3): 403–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, K. R. (1983). “Tertiary education in the 80's: Paths to reward and growth,” in I. Moses (ed.), Tertiary Education in the Eighties: Paths to Reward and Growth. Research and Development in Higher Education Vol. 6, Sydney: HERDSA, pp. 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, Ingrid (1982). Workshops for Effective Teaching. St. Lucia: University of Queensland, Tertiary Education Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, Ingrid (1983). “Evaluation and professional development: the probationary period - a case study,” in I. Moses (ed.), Tertiary Education in the Eighties: Paths to Reward and Growth. Research and Development in Higher Education Vol. 6, Sydney: HERDSA, pp. 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, Ingrid (1984). “The role of the head of department in the pursuit of excellence.” Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Higher Education, University of Lancaster, 28–31 August 1984.

  • Piper, David Warren (1978). “What makes teaching effective?” in D. W. Piper (ed.), The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Teaching in Higher Education. University of London, Teaching Methods Units, 39–52.

  • Soliman, M. H., Sungaila, H. M., Clark, R. G. and Soliman, I. K. (1983). “Staff perceptions of promotion criteria,” in I. Moses (ed.), Tertiary Education in the Eighties: Paths to Reward and Growth. Research and Development in Higher Education Vol. 6, Sydney: HERDSA, pp. 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • (TEAGUE Report) Senate Standing Committee on Education and the Arts (1982). Report on Tenure of Academics. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Queensland (1983). Report of Committee to Review Rules and Procedures for Academic Promotion. Academic Board Paper.

  • Watts, Gordon E. and Hammons, James O. (1980). “Staff development: A time for appraisal,” POD Quarterly 2(3 & 4): 175–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wergin, J. F. (1977). “Evaluating faculty development programs,” New Directions for Higher Education 17: 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is derived from an invited paper to the conference, Tertiary Teaching. Techniques for Improvement - The Australian Experience, University of Western Australia, 18 May 1984.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moses, I. Academic development units and the improvement of teaching. High Educ 14, 75–100 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155654

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155654

Keywords

Navigation