Abstract
Light does not cause a miotic response in mammals after a topical application of atropine. However, such common sense is based on the pupillary response to visible light. We found ultraviolet (UV) caused slight but evident miosis, even when the patient did not perceive visible light. In order to understand this mechanism further, we conducted in vitro experiments using hamsters. The in vitro hamster iris contracted even when the retina was withdrawn in an incubation solution. The contraction of the hamster pupil caused by visible light was inhibited by procaine, quinacrine, and by the withdrawal of divalent cations, but not by indomethacin, AA861, FPL55712 or autonomic blocking agents. UV-induced miosis was very delayed, continuing after cessation of UV stimuli. Nordihydroguaiaretic acid did not inhibit the miosis induced by UV and/or visible light. The UV-induced miosis was not significantly affected by allopurinol or verapamil, suggesting mechanisms other than neuronal mediation and oxidative stress. This study shows that the isolated hamster iris can react to UV and visible rays. UV-induced miosis is different from the miosis caused by light reflex. To our knowledge, UV-induced miosis has not yet been reported.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weale RA. Observations on the direct effect of light on the irides of Rana temporaria and Xenopus laevis. J. Physiol (Lond) 1956; 132: 257–266.
Seliger HH. Direct action of light in naturally pigmented muscle fibers, I: Action spectrum for contraction in eel iris sphincter. J Gen Physiol 1962; 46: 333–342.
Barr L, Alpern M. Photosensitivity of the frog iris. J Gen Physiol 1963; 46: 1249–1265.
Bito LZ, Turansky DG. Photoactivation of pupillary constriction in the isolated in vitro iris of Mesocricetus Auratus (hamster). Comp Biochem Physiol 1975; 50A: 407–413.
Lowenstein O, Loewenfeld IE. The pupil. In: Davson H. ed. The Eye. New York: Academic Press 1969; 3: 255–337.
Thompson HS. The pupil and the autonomic nervous system. In: Lessel van Dalen JTW (ed): Neuro-Ophthalmology Vol. 1. Amsterdam/Oxford/Princeton: Excepta Medica, 1980: 226–240.
Yoshino H, Suzuki R, Kurimoto S. Mammalian pupil constriction caused by light in the presence of atropine. Acta Ophthalmol Jpn 1990; 94: 627–31.
Suzuki R, Yoshino H, Kurimoto S. Pupillary response noted in patients with complete absence of light perception. Acta Ophthalmol Jpn (in press).
Suzuki R, Kobayashi S. Different effects of substance P and vasoactive intestinal peptide on the motor function of bovine intraocular muscles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24: 1566–1571.
Suzuki R, Kobayashi S. Effects of divalent cations on the spontaneous synchronization in mammalian iris sphincter muscle cells. Exp Eye Res 1987; 42: 407–415.
Endo M. Calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Physiol Rev 1977; 57: 71–108.
Bolton TB. Effects of stimulating the acetylcholine receptor on the current-voltage relationship of the smooth muscle membrane studied by voltage clamp of potential recorded by microelectrode. J Physiol 1975; 250: 175–202.
Kaufman MP, Iwamoto GA, Longhurst JC, Mitchell JH. Effects of capsaicin and bradykinin on afferent fibers with endings in skeletal muscle. Circ Res 1982; 50: 133–139.
Masuda Y, Imaizumi Y, Watanabe M. Evoked contraction of rat iris dilator muscle. Jap J Smooth Muscle Res 1985; 21: 332–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suzuki, R., Yoshino, H. & Kurimoto, S. Effects of ultraviolet radiation and visible light on hamster pupil. Doc Ophthalmol 77, 81–87 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154880
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154880