Summary
Yield formation of four Finnish and three Nordic oat varieties and 12 breeding lines developed at the Hankkija Plant Breeding Institute was studied during four different growing seasons (1986–1989). Seventeen characteristics were measured, including traits representing the date of maturity and architecture of the oat stand. The variation between genotypes in the examined traits was studied by means of two-way analysis of variance. The relationship between grain yield and morpho-physiological traits was studied by means of simple correlation analysis and stepwise regression analysis.
The present study, carried out in highly dissimilar growing seasons, showed that ideotype breeding in the northern growing areas is likely to be successful only in moderate to optimal growing conditions. Based on the findings of this study, a productive oat ideotype for northern cultivation is composed of traits such as early maturation, high phytomass production with a high panicle weight resulting from a large number of grains. short straw length (high resistance to lodging), and reduced tillering. The importance of other factors influencing oat breeding in northern growing conditions is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, M.W., 1982. Plant architecture and yield breeding. Iowa State J. Res. 56: 225–254.
Austin, R. B., 1982. Crop characteristics and the potential yield of wheat. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 98: 447–453.
Borojević, S., 1983. Genetic changes to increase yield potential in wheat. p. 953–957. In: Proc. 6th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Kyoto, Japan.
Donald, C.M., 1968. The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17: 385–403.
Gallais, A., 1984. Use of indirect selection in plant breeding. p. 45–60. In: W., Lange, A.C., Zeven & N.G., Hogenboom (Eds), Efficiency in Plant Breeding, Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the European Association for Research on Plant Breeding, EUCARPIA. Pudoc, Wageningen.
Hanson, P.R., T.J., Riggs, S.J., Klose & R.B., Austin, 1985. High biomass genotypes in spring barley. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 105: 73–78.
Hovinen, S., 1988. Breeding of a protein pea ideotype for Finnish conditions. J. Agric. Sci. Finland 60: 1–72.
Klinck, H.R. & S.L., Sim, 1977. Influence of temperature and photoperiod on growth and yield components in oats (Avena sativa L.). Can. J. Bot. 55: 96–106.
Mac Key, J., 1988. Shoot: root interrelations in oats. p. 340–344. In: B. Mattsson & R. Lyhagen (Eds), 3rd International Oat Conference, Lund Sweden, Svalöf.
Mahon, J.D., 1983. Limitations to the use of physiological variability in plant breeding. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 63: 11–21.
Michael, G., 1980. The role of hormones in yield formation. p. 85–116. In: Physiological Aspects of Crop Productivity. Proc. 15th Colleqium Intern. Potash Inst. Wageningen, Switzerland.
Mock, J.J. & R.B., Pearce, 1975. An ideotype of maize. Euphytica 24: 613–623.
Peltonen-Sainio, P., 1990. Genetic improvements in the structure of oat stands in northern growing conditions during this century. Plant Breeding 104: 340–345.
Rasmusson, D.C., 1987a. An evaluation of ideotype breeding. Crop Sci. 27: 1140–1146.
Rasmusson, D.C., 1987b. Ideotype and yield breeding. Barley Genetics V: 923–928.
Riggs, T.J., P.R., Hanson, N.D., Start, D.M., Miles, C.L., Morgan & M.A., Ford, 1981. Comparison of spring barley varieties grown in England and Wales between 1880 and 1980. J. Agric. Sci. Camb 97: 599–610.
Takeda, K. & K.J., Frey, 1976. Contributions of vegetative growth rate and harvest index to grain yield of progenies from Avena sativa x A. sterilis crosses. Crop Sci. 16: 817–821.
Wright, A.J., 1984. Unconventional uses of indirect and index selection. p. 69–71. In: W., Lange, A.C., Zeven & N.G., Hogenboom (Eds), Efficiency in Plant Breeding. Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the European Association for Research on Plant Breeding, EUCARPIA. Pudoc, Wageningen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peltonen-Sainio, P. Productive oat ideotype for northern growing conditions. Euphytica 54, 27–32 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145627
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145627