Skip to main content
Log in

Properties of electroretinographic intensity-response functions in retinitis pigmentosa

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dark-adapted electroretinogram (ERG) b-wave amplitudes and implicit times were recorded as a function of stimulus luminance for 15 retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients and 15 normal subjects. B-wave amplitude as a function of log stimulus luminance was fit by non-linear regression with the Naka-Rushton equation, which has 3 independent parameters: The maximum response (Rmax), slope (n) and half-saturation constant (K). B-wave implicit-time as a function of log stimulus luminance was fit by linear regression. Compared to normal, the RP Rmax values were markedly reduced, suggesting response compression; the RP K values were elevated by an average of 0.76 log unit, suggesting relatively small losses in retinal sensitivity. There was no correspondence between Rmax and visual field area for the RP patients (coefficient of correlation = -0.02). All but 2 of the 15 RP patients had normal or shallower-than-normal implicit-time intensity-response functions, indicating that over most of the dynamic range of the ERG, the implicit-times were either normal or faster-than-normal. These results are discussed in terms of possible RP disease mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armington JC, Gouras P, Tepas DI and Gunkel R (1961) Detection of the electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa. Exp Eye Res 1:74–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berson EL, Gouras P and Gunkel RD (1968) Rod responses in retinitis pigmentosa, dominantly inherited. Arch Ophthal 80:58–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berson EL, Gouras P, Gunkel RD and Myrianthopoulos NC (1969a) Dominant retinitis pigmentosa with reduced penetrance. Arch Ophthal 81:226–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berson EL, Gouras P, Gunkel RD and Myrianthopoulos NC (1969b) Rod and cone responses in sex-linked retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthal 81:215–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berson EL and Kanters L (1970) Cone and rod responses in a family with recessively inherited retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthal 84:288–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunette JR and Lafond G (1978) Timing of the electroretinogram responses and dark adaptation. J Canad Sci Neurol 5:179–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Draper NR and Smith H (1966) Applied regression analysis. New York, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschetti A, François J and Babel J (1974) Chorioretinal heredodegenerations. Springfield, Thomas

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton AB and Rushton WAH (1978) The human rod ERG: Correlation with psychophysical responses in light and dark adaptation. Vision Res 18:793–800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouras P and Carr RR (1964) Electrophysiological studies in early retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthal 72:104–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouras P (1970) Electroretinography: Some basic principles. Invest Ophthal 9:557–569

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MA and Massof RW (1982) The photomyoclonic reflex: An artefact in the clinical electroretinogram. Brit J Ophthal 66:368–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karpe G (1945) The basis of clinical electroretinography. Acta Ophthal Suppl 24:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Krill AE (1972) Hereditary retinal and choroidal diseases, Vol I. New York, Harper and Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y and Yang C (1966) Local and stray light components of the human electroretinogram due to stimulation by light subtending a 20° visual field. Scientia Sinica 15: 696–705

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massof RW and Finkelstein D (1979) Rod sensitivity relative to cone sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 18:263–272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massof RW and Johnson MA (1981) Prereceptor light absorption in setters with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 20:134–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massof RW and Finkelstein D (1981a) Two forms of autosomal dominant primary retinitis pigmentosa. Docum Ophthal 51:289–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massof RW and Finkelstein D (1981b) Subclassifications of retinitis pigmentosa from two-color scotopic static perimetry. Docum Ophthal Proc Ser 26:219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naka KI and Rushton WAH (1966) S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae). J Physiol 185:536–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothberg D, Weinstein G, Hobson R and Nork T (1982) Electroretinography and retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthal 100:1422–1426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg MA, Sullivan PL and Berson EL (1981) Temporal aspects of the dark-adapted A-wave in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 21:765–769

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by research and core facility grants from the National Eye Institute (EY-01791 and EY-01765).

Research to Prevent Blindness, Foreign Scholar Fellowship recipient; from Capital Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Massof, R.W., Wu, L., Finkelstein, D. et al. Properties of electroretinographic intensity-response functions in retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol 57, 279–296 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143087

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143087

Key words

Navigation