Skip to main content
Log in

The political economy of environmental regulation: Towards a unifying framework

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are several theories that attempt to explain various aspects of environmental policy. Building on insights from this theoretical work, and recent advances in our understanding of instrument performance, this paper constructs a more complete theory of environmental regulation. There are two primary contributions of this research. The first is to provide more satisfactory explanations for a number of observed patterns of environmental policy. For example, there is, as yet, no satisfactory theory about the emergence of incentive-based mechanisms, such as marketable permits and effluent fees. The second contribution of this paper is to develop a parsimonious framework for understanding many important aspects of environmental policy. This framework suggests the outputs of environmental policy emerge from a struggle between key interest groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, B. and Hassler, W. (1981). Clean coal/dirty air. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranson, P., Gellhorn, E. and Robinson, G. (1982). A theory of legislative delegation. Cornell Law Review 68: 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. (1979). Congress and the bureaucracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 47: 371–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, P. and Russell, C. (1985). Comparative analysis of alternative policy instruments. In A. Kneese and J. Sweeney (Eds.), Handbook of natural resource and energy economics, Volume I, 395–461. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, R., Jasanoff, S. and Ilgen, T. (1985). Controlling chemicals: The politics of regulation in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., Jr. and Johnson, R. (1984). Pollution control by effluent charges: It works in the Federal Republic of Germany, why not in the U.S. Natural Resources Journal 24: 929–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. and Tullock, G. (1975). Polluters' profits and political response: Direct controls versus taxes. American Economic Review 65: 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, J. (1987). Toward a theory of instrument choice in the regulation of markets. Mimeo. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California. 26 January. 30 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, J. (1989). Legislative institutions and the endogenous choice of regulatory instruments: A political economy approach to instrument choice. Working Paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvnia, February. Forthcoming in the Journal of Economics, Law and Organization.

  • Coelho, P. (1976). Polluters' profits and political response: Direct control versus taxes: Comment. American Economic Review 66: 976–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewees, D. (1983). Instrument choice in environmental policy. Economic Inquiry 21: 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic use of politics. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R. (1973). Congressmen in committees. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J. (1974). Pork barrel politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. (1982). Legislative choice of regulatory forms: Legal process or administrative process? Public Choice 39: 33–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. (1986). Tradeoffs in designing markets with multiple objectives. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. (1987). Economic prescriptions for environmental problems: Not exactly what the doctor ordered. Working Paper, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Forthcoming in the Journal of Economic Perspectives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. (1988). Jobs and environmental quality: Some implications for instrument choice. Policy Sciences 20: 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. and Hester, G. (1987). Marketable permits: Lessons for theory and practice. Working Paper, School of Urban and Public Affairs. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Forthcoming in the Ecology Law Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. and Hester, G. (1989). Where did all the markets go?: An analysis of EPA's emission trading program. Yale Journal on Regulation 6: 109–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. and McRae, G. (1982). Applications of market mechanisms to pollution. Policy Studies Review 1: 470–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. and Noll, R. (1982). Designing a market for tradable emissions permits. In W. Magat (Ed.), Reform of environmental regulation, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., Magat, W. and Williams, R. (1986). The economic consequences of the OSHA cotton dust standard: An analysis of stock price behavior. Journal of Law and Economics 29: 29–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneese, A. and Schultze, C. (1975). Pollution, prices and public policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liroff, R. (1986). Reforming air pollution regulation: The toil and trouble of EPA's bubble. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magat, W., Krupnick, A. and Harrington, W. (1986). Rules in the making: A statistical analysis of regulatory agency behavior. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, M. and McCormick, R. (1982). A positive theory of environmental quality regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 25: 99–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, M. (1985). The legislative design of regulatory structure. American Journal of Political Science 29: 721–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, M. and Page, T. (1986). The congressional foundations of agency performance. Public Choice 51: 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnick, R. (1983). Regulation and the Courts. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, R. (1983). The political foundations of regulatory policy. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 139: 377–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B. and Braeutigam, R. (1978). The regulation game. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolph, E. (1983). Government allocation of property rights: Who gets what? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 3: 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K. and Weingast, B. (1984). Political solutions to market problems. American Political Science Review 78: 417–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics 2: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, W. (1982). Progress and privilege: America in the age of environmentalism. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. (1981). Regulation, reregulation, and deregulation: The political foundations of agency clientele relationships. Law and Contemporary Problems 44: 147–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W. (1983). The political feasibility of full ownership property rights: The cases of pollution and fisheries. Policy Sciences 16: 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (Ed.) (1980). The politics of regulation. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohe, G. (1976). Polluters' profits and political response: Direct control versus taxes: Comment. American Economic Review 66: 981–982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation. I would like to thank Gordon Hester for helpful comments. Responsibility for the final product rests solely with the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hahn, R.W. The political economy of environmental regulation: Towards a unifying framework. Public Choice 65, 21–47 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139289

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139289

Keywords

Navigation