Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of fixed costs in two-person sequential bargaining

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rubinstein (1982) considered the problem of dividing a given surplus between two players sequentially, and then proposed a model in which the two players alternately make and respond to each other's offers through time. He further characterized the perfect equilibrium outcomes, which depend on the players’ time preferences and order of moves. Using both equal and unequal bargaining cost conditions and an unlimited number of rounds, two experiments were designed to compare the perfect equilibrium model to alternative models based on norms of fairness. We report analyses of final agreements, first offers, and number of bargaining rounds, which provide limited support to the perfect equilibrium model, and then conclude by recommending a shift in focus from model testing to specification of the conditions favoring one model over another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Binmore, K., Shaked, A., and Sutton J.: 1985, ‘Testing noncooperative bargaining theory: A preliminary study’, American Economic Review, 75, 1178–1180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, F. Y.: 1881, Mathematical Physics. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., and Schwarze, B.: 1982, ‘An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization’, 3, 367–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1977, Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R.: 1932, The Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H.: 1986a, ‘Fairness and the assumptions of economies’, The Journal of Business, 59, 285–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H.: 1986b, ‘Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market’, The American Economic Review, 76, 728–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B.: 1986, ‘An introduction to game theory’, in S. Reiter (Ed.), Studies in Mathematical Economics. Washington: The Mathematical Association of America, pp. 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F.: 1950, ‘The bargaining problem’, Econometrica, 18, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F.: 1951, ‘Non-cooperative games’, Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F.: 1953, ‘Two-person cooperative games’, Econometrica, 21, 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelin, J., Sonnenschein, H., and Spiegel, M.: 1988, ‘A further test of noncooperative bargaining theory’, American Economic Review, 78, 824–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, J., and Roth, A. E.: 1989, ‘An experimental study of sequential bargaining’, American Economic Review, 79, 355–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotih, A. E.: 1986, ‘Laboratory experimentation in economies’, Economics and Philosophy, 2, 245–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. E.: 1988, ‘Laboratory experimentation in economics: A methodological overview’, The Economic Journal, 98, 974–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. E., and Malouf, M. W. K.: 1979, ‘Game-theoretic models and the role of information in bargaining’, Psychological Review, 86, 574–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. E., Malouf, M. W. K., and Murnighan, J. K.: 1981, ‘Sociological versus strategical factors in bargaining’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2, 153–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. E., and Murnighan, J. K.: 1982, ‘The role of information in bargaining: An experimental study’, Econometrica, 50, 1123–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. E., and Schoumaker, F.: 1983, ‘Expectations and reputations in bargaining: An experimental study’, The American Economic Review, 73, 362–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A.: 1982, ‘Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model’, Econometrica, 50, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C.: 1963, The Strategy of Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R.: 1972, ‘Equal share analysis of characteristic function experiments.’ In H. Sauermann (Ed.), Contributions to Experimental Economics, III. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr, pp. 130–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R.: 1975, ‘Re-examination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games,’ International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 25–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R.: 1982, ‘Equal division payoff bounds for three-person characteristic function experiments’. In R. Tietz (Ed.), Aspiration Levels in Bargaining and Economic Decision Making. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R.: 1987, ‘Equity and coalition bargaining in experimental 3-person games’. In A. E. Roth (Ed.), Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ståhl, I.: 1972, Bargaining Theory. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeuthen, F.: 1930, Problems of Monopoly and Economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rapoport, A., Weg, E. & Felsenthal, D.S. Effects of fixed costs in two-person sequential bargaining. Theor Decis 28, 47–71 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139238

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139238

Keywords

Navigation