Skip to main content

Non-Cooperative Bargaining Theory

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation
  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

Non-cooperative game theory has contributed several major ideas to the study of negotiation. In the two-person context, the line of research based on simultaneous offers with incomplete information focused on the strategy of making demands, showing the importance of each side’s perception of the other, and how these perceptions can lead to inefficiency. The Rubinstein Alternating Offers game emphasizes the role of time, and establishes a link to the Nash Bargaining Solution. More recent studies have turned to coalitional bargaining and its relation to the core.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abreu D, Gul F (2000) Bargaining and reputation. Econometrica 68:85–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abreu D, Rubinstein A (1988) The structure of Nash equilibrium in repeated games with finite automata. Econometrica 56:1259–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay S, Chatterjee K (2006) Coalition theory and its applications: a survey. Econ J 116(509):F136–F155, 02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore KG (1985) Bargaining and coalitions. In: Roth AE (ed) Game theoretic models of bargaining. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore KG, Rubinstein A, Wolinsky A (1986) The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling. Rand J Econ 17:176–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton GE, Chatterjee K, McGinn KL (2003) How communication links influence coalition bargaining: a laboratory investigation. Manag Sci 49(5):583–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K (1982) Incentive compatibility in bargaining under uncertainty. Q J Econ 95:717–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Lee CC (1998) Bargaining and search with incomplete information about outside options. Games Econ Behav 22(2):203–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Sabourian H (2000) Multiperson bargaining and strategic complexity. Econometrica 68:1491–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Sabourian H (2009) Game theory and strategic complexity. In: Meyers R (ed) Springer encyclopaedia of complexity and systems science. Springer, Berlin/New York, pp 4098–4114

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Samuelson WF (1979) The simple economics of bargaining mimeo. The Pennsylvania State University and Boston University, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Samuelson WF (1983) Bargaining under incomplete information. Oper Res 31(5):835–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Samuelson L (1987) Bargaining with two-sided incomplete information: an infinite horizon model with alternating offers. Rev Econ Stud 54:175–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Samuelson L (1988) Bargaining under two-sided incomplete information: the unrestricted offers case. Opera Rese 36(4):605–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Dutta B, Ray D, Sengupta K (1993) A non-cooperative theory of coalitional bargaining. Rev Econ Stud 60:463–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans RA (1997) Coalitional bargaining with competition to make offers. Games Econ Behav 19(2):211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forges F, Mertens J-F, Vohra R (2002) The ex ante incentive compatible core in the absence of wealth effects. Econometrica 70(5):1865–1892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul F (1989) Bargaining foundations of the Shapley value. Econometrica 57(1):81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi JC (1974) An equilibrium-point interpretation of stable sets and a proposed alternative definition. Manag Sci 20(11):1422–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart S, Levy Z (1999) Efficiency does not imply immediate agreement. Econometrica 67(4):909–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero M (1985) A strategic bargaining approach to market institutions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC (1994) Bargaining and search with recall: a two-period model with complete information. Oper Res 42:1100–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moldovanu B, Winter E (1995) Order independent equilibria. Games Econ Behav 9(1):21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthoo A (2000) Bargaining theory with applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson R (1991) Game theory: analysis of conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson R, Satterthwaite M (1983) Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. J Econ Theory 28:265–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash J (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21:128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada A (1996) A non-cooperative coalitional bargaining game with random proposers. Games Econ Behav 16:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada A (2012) Non-cooperative bargaining and the incomplete informational core. J Econ Theory 147:1165–1190

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A (1990) Bargaining and markets. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry M, Reny PJ (1994) A non-cooperative view of coalition formation and the core. Econometrica 62(4):795–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa H (1982) The art and science of negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray D (2007) A game theoretic perspective on coalition formation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE (1979) Axiomatic models of bargaining. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidmann Dl J, Winter E (1998) A theory of gradual coalition formation. Rev Econ Stud 65(4):793–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten R (1965) Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit – Teil I Bestimmung des dynamischen Preisgleichgewichts. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 121:301–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten R (1981) A non-cooperative model of characteristic function bargaining. In: Böhm V, Nachtkamp H (eds) Essays in game theory and mathematical economics. Bibl Institut, Mannheim, pp 131–151. Reprinted in: Selten R (1989) Models of strategic rationality. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaked A (1986) The three-player unanimity game, presented at meetings of Operations Research Society of America, Los Angeles, April 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz M (2003) Bargaining without a common prior – an immediate agreement theorem. Econometrica 71(3):793–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalyan Chatterjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chatterjee, K. (2020). Non-Cooperative Bargaining Theory. In: Kilgour, D.M., Eden, C. (eds) Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12051-1_9-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12051-1_9-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12051-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12051-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics