Skip to main content
Log in

The economic returns to investment in women's education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper discusses the problems of measuring the rate of return to women's education, and evidence is presented for nine countries which shows that the returns to secondary and higher education are on average two percentage points lower for women than for men, but in some countries they are actually higher. Education increases the earning capacity of women, and also increases their propensity to remain in the labour market. But some allowance must be made for the value of women's non-market work, for indirect benefits of education, and for psychic income. Various methods are suggested for measuring the non-monetary benefits of education, such as the intergeneration effect of a mother's education on the future achievement of her children, or the non-pecuniary benefits of employment for women in the labour force. The effects of discrimination on women's earnings and job prospects are discussed, and it is shown that a large part of the observed differential between male and female earnings is due to the concentration of women in low-income occupations. The paper concludes that the difference between the returns to education for men and women is less than is often suggested, particularly if some attempt is made to measure nonmonetary benefits. But the returns to women's education would be increased if there were a change in traditional attitudes leading to a more equal occupational distribution and better utilisation of women in the labour force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arregger, C. E. (1966). Graduate Women at Work. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1957). The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1970). An Introduction to the Economics of Education. London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1972). “atThe Correlation between Education and Earnings: What Does it Signify?” Higher Education (February).

  • Bowen, W. G., and Finegan, T. A. (1969). The Economics of Labor Force Participation. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, J., and McKenna, E. E. (1965). “atSome Factors Associated with Age-grade Placement of Migrant Children,” Rural Sociology.

  • Brazer, H. E., and David, M. (1962). “Social and Economic Determinants of the Demand for Education,” in S. Mushkin, Economics of Higher Education. U.S. Office of Education.

  • Cain, G. (1966). Married Women in the Labour Force: An Economic Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1958). “The Economics of Housework,” Bulletin of the Oxford Institute of Statistics (May).

  • Cohen, M. S. (1971). “atSex Differences in Compensation,” Journal of Human Resources (Fall).

  • Department of Education and Science (1971). Survey of Earnings of Qualified Manpower in England and Wales 1966–67. Statistics of Education, Special Series No. 3. London: H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, N. T. (1966). Women in the Soviet Economy. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, D. J. (1969). “The Impact of Parental and Educational Investments upon Student Achievement,” mimeo paper presented to the American Statistical Association.

  • Fogarty, M. P. et al. (1971a). Sex, Career and Family. London: George Allen and Unwin, for P.E.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, M. P. et al. (1971b). Women in Top Jobs. London: George Allen and Unwin, for P.E.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J. D. (1972). “atDiscrimination, Achievement, and Pay-Offs of a College Degree,” Journal of Human Resources (Winter).

  • Gwartney, J., and Stroup, R. (1971). “Sex Discrimination in Employment: The Man or the Myth?” mimeo paper presented to Western Economic Association.

  • Hines, F., et al. (1970). “Social and Private Rates of Return to Investment in Schooling by Sex Groups and Regions,” Journal of Human Resources (Summer).

  • Hunt, A. (1968). A Survey of Women's Employment. London: H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, J. (1971). Sex in the Market Place: American Women at Work. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, D. J. (1967). “Differences in Pay Between Men and Women Workers,” Monthly Labor Review (December).

  • Mincer, J. (1962a). “On-the-Job Training: Costs, Returns and Some Implications,” Journal of Political Economy Supplement (October).

  • Mincer, J. (1962b). “Labour Force Participation of Married Women: A Study of Labour Supply,” in Aspects of Labor Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreh, J. (1971). “Human Capital and Economic Growth: United Kingdom, 1951–1961,” Economic and Social Review (October).

  • Morris, V., and Ziderman, A. (1971). “The Economic Return on Investment in Higher Education in England and Wales,” Economic Trends (May).

  • O.E.C.D. (1971). Educational Expansion in OECD Countries since 1950. Paris: O.E.C.D.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. K. (1970). The Female Labor Force in the U.S.: Demographic and Economic Factors Governing its Growth and Changing Composition. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostry, S. (1968). The Female Worker in Canada 1968. Ottawa: Dominion Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G. (1973). Returns to Education: An International Comparison. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on the Status of Women in Canada (1970). Report. Ottawa: Information Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanborn, H. (1964). “Pay Differences between Men and Women,” Industrial & Labor Relations Review (July).

  • Schultz, T. (1970). “The Reckoning of Education as Human Capital,” in Education, Income & Human Capital, ed. Lee Hansen. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seear, B. N. (1971). Re-Entry of Women to the Labour Market after an Interruption in Employment. OECD.

  • Siegel, P. M. (1965). “On the Cost of Being a Negro,” Sociological Inquiry (Winter)

  • Sirageldin, I. H. (1969). Non-Market Components of National Income. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Survey Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, W. J., and Weisbrod, B. A. (1965). “On the Monetary Value of Education's Intergeneration Effects,” Journal of Political Economy (December).

  • Thias, H., and Carnoy, M. (1969). Cost-Benefit Analysis in Education: A Case-Study on Kenya. World Bank Report No. EC-173.

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1964). External Benefits of Public Education: An Economic Analysis. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women's Bureau (1969). Handbook of Women Workers, 1969. U.S. Department of Labor: Women's Bureau Bulletin 294. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodhall, M. The economic returns to investment in women's education. High Educ 2, 275–299 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138806

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138806

Keywords

Navigation