Abstract
This study investigates the impact of educational expansion on the relationship between education and its economic returns as posited by the human capital theory. Specifically, we explore how the expansion of education affects the returns to higher levels of education relative to lower ones and examine gender differences across levels of education. To achieve these objectives, we use data from the Vietnam Household Living Standards Surveys (VHLSS) conducted between 2002 and 2014, encompassing a sample of 133,600 individuals. Our empirical findings, consistent with the human capital theory, show that higher levels of education are associated with increased monetary returns, even in the context of educational expansion. Nevertheless, we observe varied gender effects resulting from the expansion of education, particularly for individuals with no or primary education. Notably, women in these educational categories tend to earn lower wages than their male counterparts. In contrast, women who have attained tertiary education have higher wage premiums than men. Overall, this study's results support the human capital theory while emphasizing the significance of considering education as a positional good and recognizing the gender-specific impacts of educational expansion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See literature review section for more details.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, 4b, 1043–1171.
Ackah, C., Adjasi, C., Turkson, F., & Acquah, A. (2016). Education, skill, and earnings: Further evidence from Ghana. Learning to Compete WP, 16, 1–8.
Araki, S. (2020). Educational expansion, skills diffusion, and the economic value of credentials and skills. American Sociological Review, 85(1), 128–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419897873
Arrow, K. J. (1973). Higher education as a filter. Journal of Public Economics, 2(1973), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(73)90013-3
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bills, D. B. (2016). Congested credentials: The material and positional economies of schooling. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43(2016), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2016.03.002
Bol, T. (2015). Has education become more positional? Educational expansion and labor market outcomes, 1985–2007. Acta Sociologica, 58(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699315570918
Card, D. (1995). Using geographic variation in college proximity to estimate the return to schooling. Essays in honor of John Vanderkamp. University of Toronto Press.
Carneiro, P., Heckman, J., & Vytlacil, E. (2011). Estimating marginal returns to education. American Economic Review, 101(6), 2754–2781. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2754
Certo, S. T., Busenbark, J. R., Woo, H., & Semadeni, M. (2016). Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2639–2657. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2475
Chowdhury, I., Johnson, H., Mannava, A., & Perova, E. (2019). Gender gap in earnings in Vietnam: Why do Vietnamese women work in lower paid occupations? Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 36(3), 400–423. https://doi.org/10.1596/31485
Dickson, M., & Smith, S. (2011). What determines the return to education: An extra year or a hurdle cleared. Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1167–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.05.004
Didier, N. (2021). Does the expansion of higher education reduce gender gaps in the labor market? Evidence from a natural experiment. International Journal of Educational Development, 86, 102467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102467
Di Stasio, V., Bol, T., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2016). What makes education positional? Institutions, overeducation and the competition for jobs. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.09.005
Dougherty, C. (2005). Why are the returns to schooling higher for women than for men? Journal of Human Resources, XL(4), 969–988. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.xl.4.969
Frank, R. H. (2011). The Darwin economy: Liberty, competition, and the common good. Princeton University Press.
Gaëlle, P. (2012). Recent labor market performance in Vietnam through a gender lens. Policy Research Working Paper No. 6056. World Bank.
Gesthuizen, M., Solga, H., & Künster, R. (2011). Context matters: Economic marginalization of low-educated workers in cross-national perspective. European Sociological Review, 27(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq006
Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2008). The race between education and technology. Harvard University Press.
Government of Vietnam. (2014). Resolution No. 14/2005/NQ-CP Dated November 02, 2005, on Substantial and Comprehensive Renewal of Vietnam's Tertiary Education in the 2006–2020 Period. Government.
Hanushek, A. (2016). Will more higher education improve economic growth? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32(4), 538–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grw025
Koné, S., Bonfoh, B., Dao, D., Kone, I., & Fink, G. (2019). Heckman-type selection models to obtain unbiased estimates with missing measures outcome: Theoretical considerations and an application to missing birth weight data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0840-7
Leung, S. F., & Yu, S. (1996). On the choice between sample selection and two-part models. Journal of Econometrics, 72(1–2), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01720-4
Meghir, C., & Rivkin, S. (2011). Chapter 1: Econometric methods for research in education. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 1–87). Elsevier B.V.
Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. National Bureau of Economic Research.
MOET. (2005). Vietnam higher education renovation agenda: Period 2006–2020. Ministry of Education and Training.
Nieto, S., & Ramos, R. (2017). Overeducation, skills and wage penalty: Evidence for Spain using PIAAC data. Social Indicators Research, 134(1), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1423-1
Ortiz, L., & Rodriguez-Menés, J. (2016). The positional value of education and its effect on general and technical fields of education: Educational expansion and occupational returns to education in Spain. European Sociological Review, 32(2), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv085
Patrinos, H. A. (2019). The changing pattern of returns to education: What impact will this have on inequality? Policy Research Working Paper No. 8866. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8866
Pham, T., & Reilly, B. (2007). The gender pay gap in Vietnam, 1993–2002: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Asian Economics, 18(5), 775–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2007.04.001
Posselt, J. R., & Grodsky, E. (2017). Graduate education and social stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074324
Prime Minister of Vietnam. (2001). Strategy for Educational Development 2001–2010 Issued Together with Decision No. 201/2001/QĐ dated December 28, 2001 of the Prime Minister. Prime Minister.
Puhani, P. (2000). The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00104
Quadlin, N., VanHeuvelen, T., & Ahearn, C. E. (2023). Higher education and high-wage gender inequality. Social Science Research, 112, 102873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102873
Rotman, A., Shavit, Y., & Shalev, M. (2016). Nominal and positional perspectives on educational stratification in Israel. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43(2016), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.001
Schwiebert, J. (2015). Estimation and interpretation of a Heckman selection model with endogenous covariates. Empirical Economics, 49, 675–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0881-z
Smyth, E., & McCoy, S. (2011). The dynamics of credentialism: Ireland from bust to boom (and back again). Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2011.01.002
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(1973), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Tien, N. D. L. (2014). An analysis of labour market returns to education in Vietnam: Evidence from the National Labour Force Survey 2012. Turin School of Development Working Paper No. 3. International Training Centre of the ILO.
Tholen, G. (2017). Symbolic closure: Towards a renewed sociological perspective on the relationship between higher education, credentials and the graduate labour market. Sociology, 51(5), 1067–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516641857
Thurow, L. C. (1975). Generating inequality. Basic Books.
Torche, F. (2015). Analyses of intergenerational mobility: An interdisciplinary review. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 657(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214547476
Truong, T. H., Ogawa, K., & Sanfo, J. B. M. (2021). Educational expansion and the economic value of education in Vietnam: An instrument-free analysis. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100025.
Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2011). Skills, positional good or social closure? The role of education across structural–institutional labour market settings. Journal of Education and Work, 24(5), 521–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2011.586994
Van der Meer, P. H. (2011). Educational credentials and external effects: A test for the Netherlands. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29(1), 107–118.
Verhaest, D., & van der Velden, R. (2013). Cross-country differences in graduate overeducation. European Sociological Review, 29(3), 642–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcs044
Willis, R. J., & Rosen, S. (1979). Education and self-selection. The Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), S7–S36.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there exists no competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethical approval
Hereby, I (Truong Thu Ha) consciously assure that for the manuscript “Education Expansion and Its Returns to Education in Vietnam: A Two-Step Heckman Model Analysis” the following is fulfilled:
(1) This material is the authors' own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere.
(2) The paper is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
(3) The paper reflects the authors' own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner.
(4) The paper properly credits the meaningful contributions of co-authors.
(5) The results are appropriately placed in the context of prior and existing research.
(6) All sources used are properly disclosed. Literally copying of text must be indicated as such by using quotation marks and giving proper reference.
(7) All authors have been personally and actively involved in substantial work leading to the paper, and will take public responsibility for its content.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sanfo, JB.M.B., Ogawa, K. & Truong, T.H. Education expansion and its returns to education in Vietnam: a two-step Heckman model analysis. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09967-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09967-0