Abstract
This article is concerned with improvement in institutions of higher education through enhancing the role of values and objectives in guiding effort and evaluating outcomes. The term “objectives” is used in a broad sense to include general statements of institutional purposes, more specific instructional, research and public service goals, and professional and personal objectives of the academic community, as well as the goals of “clients” and the larger community within which a college or university operates.
Difficulties are identified that stand in the way of optimization in determining and reassessing basic objectives and in working with objectives once they are determined. The possible contribution of external evaluation is considered, including that of accreditation agencies and evaluation research. Two additional approaches are suggested: a governance audit and, especially, an optimization review. An outline is provided of points that could be considered in an optimization review. Attention is given to an institution having access to and drawing upon diverse perspectives and needed capabilities. The role suggested for the external evaluator is that of providing insights that facilitate an institution in developing its own capacity for sustained self-study and improvement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association of University Professors (1984). Policy Documents and Reports. Washington, DC: AAUP.
Barton, R. F. (1981). “An MCDM approach for resolving goal conflict in MBO,” Academy of Management Review 6: 231–241.
Bergquist, W. H. and Shoemaker, W. A. (1976). “Facilitating comprehensive institutional development,” in W. H. Bergquist and W. A. Shoemaker (eds.) A Comprehensive Approach to Institutional Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, D. G. (1974). “Taking advantage of external evaluation,” in H. R. Bowen (ed.), Evaluating Institutions for Accountability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1982). The Control of the Campus. Lawrenceville, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chen, H. T. and Rossi, P. H. (1980). “The multi-goal, theory-driven approach to evaluation: a model linking basic and applied social science,” Social Forces 59: 106–122.
Chen, H. T. and Rossi, P. H. (1983). “Evaluating with sense: the theory-driven approach.” Evaluation Review 7: 283–302.
Cope, R. G. (1981). “Environmental assessments for strategic planning,” in N. Poulton (ed.), Evaluation of Management and Planning Systems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dressel, P. L. (1979). “Institutional researchers: created or educated?” in R. G. Cope (ed.), Professional Development for Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dressel, P. L. (1982). “Values (virtues and vices) in decision-making,” in R. F. Wilson (ed.), Designing Academic Program Reviews. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Engdahl, L. E. (1981). “Objectives, objections and options: current perceptions of regional accreditation,” North Central Association Quarterly 56: 3–13.
Evered, R. and Louis, M. R. (1981). “Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: ‘inquiry from the inside’ and ‘inquiry from the outside,’” Academy of Management Review 6: 385–395.
Fincher, C. (1978). “Importance of criteria for institutional goals,” in R. Fenske (ed.), Using Goals in Research and Planning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fulton, O. (1984). “Needs, expectations and responses: new pressures on higher education,” Higher Education 13: 193–223.
Gorry, G. A. and Goodrich, T. J. (1978). “On the role of values in program evaluation,” Evaluation Quarterly 2: 561–572.
Hipps, G. M. (1982) (ed.). Effective Planned Change Strategies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hopkins, D. S. P. and Schroeder, R. G. (eds.) (1977). Applying Analytic Methods to Planning and Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
House, E. R. (1982). “Alternative evaluation strategies in higher education,” in R. F. Wilson (ed.), Designing Academic Program Reviews. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Huffman, J. (1982). “The role of accreditation in preserving institutional integrity,” Educational Record 63(3): 41–44.
Keller, G. (1983). Academic Strategy: The Management Revolution in American Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kells, H. R. (1980). Self-Study Processes: A Guide for Postsecondary Institutions. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Kells, H. R. and Kirkwood, R. (1979). “Institutional self-evaluation processes,” Educational Record 60(1): 25–45.
Lindsay, A. (1981). “Assessing institutional performance in higher education: a managerial perspective,” Higher Education 10: 687–706.
Millard, R. M. (1981). “Accreditation and challenges of the 80's.” Address to the American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC.
Millard, R. M. (1983). “The accrediting association: ensuring the quality of programs and institutions,” Change 15(4): 32–36.
Munitz, B. (1978). “Strengthening institutional leadership,” in C. F. Fisher (ed.), Developing and Evaluating Administrative Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Patton, M. Q. (1978). Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Powers, D. R. and Powers, M. F. (1984). “How to orchestrate participatory strategic planning without sacrificing momentum,” Educational Record 65(4): 48–52.
Redinbaugh, L. D. and Redinbaugh, D. F. (1983). “Theory Z management at colleges and universities,” Educational Record 64(1): 26–30.
Romney, L. C., Bogen, G. and Micek, S. S. (1979). “Assessing institutional performance: the importance of being careful,” International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 3: 79–89.
Sagen, H. B. (1974). “Evaluation of performance within institutions,” in H. R. Bowen (ed.), Evaluating Institutions for Accountability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Scriven, M. (1972). “Pros and cons of goal-free evaluation,” Evaluation Comment 3(4): 1–4.
Sherrill, S. (1984). “Toward a coherent view of evaluation,” Evaluation Review 8: 443–466.
Simpson, W. B. (1981). “Faculty salary structure for a college or university,” Journal of Higher Education 52: 219–236.
Sizer, J. (1979). “Assessing institutional performance: an overview,” International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 3: 49–77.
Stake, R. E. (1970). “Objectives, priorities, and other judgment data,” Review of Educational Research 40: 181–212.
Stake, R. E. and Denny, T. (1969). “Needed concepts and techniques for utilizing more fully the potential of evaluation,” in R. W. Tyler (ed.), Educational Evaluations: New Roles, New Means. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tritschler, D. (1981). “Strategies for assessing performance at your own institution,” in R. I. Wilson (ed.), Institutional Assessment for Self-Improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tyler, R. W. (1950). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
University of California at Los Angeles, Academic Senate Committee on Academic Freedom (May 29, 1984). Statement on Academic Freedom.
Warner, W. K. (1977). Accreditation Influences on Senior Institutions of Higher Education in the Western Accrediting Region: An Assessment. Oakland, CA: A report prepared for the Western College Association.
Webster, R. S. (1979). “A management team approach to institutional renewal,” Educational Record 60: 241–252.
Young, K. E. (1979). “New pressures on accreditation,” Journal of Higher Education 50: 132–144.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simpson, W.B. Revitalizing the role of values and objectives in institutions of higher education: Difficulties encountered and the possible contribution of external evaluation. High Educ 14, 535–551 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138411
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138411