Abstract
In this article the process of developing a policy for the recent comprehensive retrenchment operation in the Dutch university system is analysed from a theoretical point of view on decisionmaking. The article especially addresses the question whether some empirical evidence can be found for the rationalist view of collective decision-making, which states that a process of social communication should eventually lead to a unanimous and rational consensus concerning the selection of the optimal policy.
The actual analysis concerns the way a retrenchment policy has been developed in a process of social communication between the most important actors: the Minister of Education and Science and the thirteen Dutch universities. It is assumed that the various communicative linkages between these actors can be interpreted as a policy network in which both governmental and non-governmental actors operate.
The article concludes that in the Dutch university policy-network a complicated balance of interdependencies exists and that several sub-networks can be distinguished. It is also concluded that the Minister, while recognizing the interdependencies in the network, was able to use a special kind of (negative) incentive, inducing the universities to act as he wished.
This negative incentive steering, however, also persuaded the universities to go to the utmost in their consultation efforts, thus trying to reach the rationalist ideal of collective decision-making. The final conclusion therefore is that the rationalist view of collective decision-making does not appear to be unrealistic. The article ends with a warning against a common mistake made regarding the normative appearance of the rationalist perspective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackoff, R. L. and Emery, F. E. (1972).On Purposeful Systems. New York: Atherton.
Aldrich, H. E. (1979).Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Aldrich, H. E. and Whetten, D. A. (1981). “Organizational sets, action sets, and networksmaking the most of simplicity,” in: P. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (eds.),Handbook of Organization Design. London: Oxford University Press.
Bailey, G. G. and O'Connor, R. J. (1975). “Operationalizing incrementalism,”Public Administration Review 35: 60–66.
Baumgartner, T., Burns, T. R. and DeVillé, P. (1978). “Actors, games and systems: the dialectics of social action and system structuring,” in: R. F. Geyer and J. van der Zouwen (eds.),Sociocybernetics. Vol. 1. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Benson, J. K. (1982). “A framework of policy analysis,” in: D. L. Roger, D. A. Whetten and Associates,Interorganizational Coordination. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Braybrooke, D. and Lindblom, C. E. (1970).A Strategy of Decision, Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. New York, 1970: The Free Press.
Camhis, M. (1979).Planning Theory and Philosophy. London: Tavistock.
Collingridge, D. (1982).Critical Decision Making, A New Theory of Social Choice. London: Frances Pinter.
Elster, J. (1983).Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Etzioni, A. (1968).The Active Society. London: Collier MacMillan.
Gregg, P. (1976).Problems of Theory in Policy Analysis. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Grondsma, T. (1983).TVC-Process and Speitheorie. Delft: (Mimeograph, in Dutch).
Faludi, A. (forthcoming).Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology.
Friend, J. F., Power, J. M. and Yewlet, C. J. E. (1974).Public Planning: The Intercorporate Dimension. London: Tavistock.
Heclo, H. (1978). “Issues networks and the executive establishment,” in: A. King (ed.),The New American Political System. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Hood, C. (1983).The Tools of Government. London: MacMillan.
King, A. (1978). “The American policy in the late 1970s: building coalitions in the sand,” in: A. King (ed.),The New American Political System. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Lowi, T. J. (1979).The End of Liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton.
Mannheim, K. (1968).Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mayntz, R. (1983). “The conditions of effective public policy: a new challenge for policy analysis,”Policy and Politics 11 (2): 123–144.
Milward, H. B. and Francisco, R. A. (1983). “Subsystem politics and corporation in the United States,”Policy and Politics 11 (3): 273–293.
Mitnick, B. M. (1980).The Political Economy of Regulation, Creating, Designing and Removing Regulatory Forms. New York: Columbia University Press.
Peterson, M. W. (1981). “Financial planning for the 1980s: a response to reality and competitions,”Planning for Higher Education9 (4): 1–5.
Popper, K. R. (1966).The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Popper, K. R. (1974). “Replies to my critics,” in: P. A. Schupp (ed.),The Philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle, Il: The Open Court.
Redford, E. S. (1969).Democracy in the Administrative State. New York: Oxford University Press.
Russell, B. (1971).A History of Western Philosophy (2nd edition). London: George Alien & Unwin.
Schulman, P. R. (1975). “Nonincremental policy making: notes toward an alternative Paradigm,”American Political Science Review 69: 1354–1370.
Simon, H. A. (1976).Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (third edition). New York: The Free Press.
Solesbury, W. (1974).Policy in Urban Planning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Steinbruner, J. D. (1974).The Cybernetic Theory of Decision: New Dimensions of Political Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Warren, R. L., Rose, St. and Bergunder, A. (1974).The Structure of Urban Reform. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Weinrich, H. (1971). “Diskurs, Didaktik und die Diktatur des Sitzfleisches,” in: J. Habermas and N. Luhmann (eds.),Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Was leistet die Systemforschung? Theorie-Diskussion. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Whetten, D. A. (1982). “Issues in conducting research,” in: D. L. Rogers, D. A. Whetten and Associates,Interorganizational Coordination. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Wildavsky, A. (1974).The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little Brown.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The case of the policy development process concerning the retrenchment operation in the Dutch university system in 1982 and 1983.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Vught, F.A. Negative incentive steering in a policy network. High Educ 14, 593–616 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136500
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136500