Abstract
This paper investigates the trade policy of the EC, based on Art. 115, Treaty of Rome. It is shown that politicians and bureaucrats take advantage of the significant discretion the procedure allows. Political and bureaucratic self-interest are the underlying motives for national trade barriers against non-member countries based on Art. 115. The empirical results support this hypothesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. (1988): The relative inefficiency of quotas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baldwin, R.E. (1985). The political economy of US import policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baldwin, R.E. (1988). Trade policy in a changing world economy, Ch. 7: The economics of the GATT, Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Beutler, B., Bieber, R., Pipkorn, J. and Streil, J. (1987). Die Europäische Gemeinschaft: Rechtsordnung und Politik, 2nd ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
Breton, A. and Wintrobe, R. (1975). The equilibrium size of a budget-maximizing bureau: A note on Niskanen's theory of bureaucracy, Journal of Political Economy 83: 195–207.
Cassing, J.H. and Hilman, A.L. (1985). Political influence motives and the choice between tariffs and quotas. Journal of International Economics 19: 279–290.
Dartel, R.J.P.M. van (1983). The conduct of the EEC's textile trade policy and the applications of Article 115 EEC. In Europe Institute (Ed.), Protectionism and the European Community. Deventer: Kluwer.
European Communities (1980). Official Journal Series L 16/14, Decision (80/47/EWG).
European Communities (1987). Official Journal Series L 238/26, Decision (87/433/EWG).
Eymann, A. and Schuknecht, L. (1990). Antidumping policy in the European Community: Political discretion or technical determination? Discussion Paper no. 106, University of Konstanz.
Feigenbaum, S. Ortiz, H. and Willet, T.D. (1985). Protectionist pressures and aggregate economic conditions: Comment on Takacs. Economic Inquiry 23: 175–184.
Finger, J.M., Hall, H.K. and Nelson, D.R. (1982). The political economy of administered protection. American Economic Review 72(3): 452–466.
European Court of Justice (1976). Collection of the Court's Rulings. Luxemburg.
Hailbronner, K. and Bierwagen, R.M. (1989). Neuere Entwicklungen im Außenwirtschaftsrecht der Europäischen Gemeinschaften. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, No. 22.
Hillman, A.L. (1989). The political economy of protection. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Hine, R.C. (1985). The political economy of European trade: An introduction to the trade policies of the EEC. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.
Ipsen, H.P. (1972). Europäisches Gemeinschaftsrecht (European Community Law). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Lux, M. (1979). Ausschluß von der Gemeinschaft bei Umwegeinfuhren (Art. 115 EWGV), Europarecht 4: 359–392.
Neme, C. (1988). 1992 et la Clause de l'Article 115: A Quand une Politique Commerciale Commune? Revue du Marché Commun, no. 322 (Décembre).
Niskanen, W.A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago/New York: Aldine & Atherton.
Oliver, P. (1988). Free movement of goods in the EEC under Articles 30 to 36 of the Treaty of Rome. London: European Law Centre Limited.
OECD (1983). Textile and clothing industries. Paris.
Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19.
Shughart II, W.F. and Tollison, R.D. (1985). The cyclical character of regulatory activity. Public Choice 45: 303–311.
Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics 2.
Takacs, W.E. (1981). Pressures for protectionism: An empirical analysis. Economic Inquiry 19: 687–693.
Vaubel, R. (1986). A public choice approach to international organization. Public Choice 51: 39–57.
Vaubel, R. and Willet, T.D. (Eds.) (1990). The political economy of international organization: A public choice approach. Boulder: Westview Publishers.
Weber, A. (1979). Die Bedeutung des Art. 115 EWGV, für die Freiheit des Warenverkehrs. Europarecht 1: 30–47.
Wildavsky, A. (1964). The politics of the budgetary process. Boston: Little, Brown.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Thanks go to Brigitte Bacher, Rainer Bierwagen, Peter Moser, Bernd Starke, Joerg Stephan, Heinrich Ursprung, Roland Vaubel, Jutta Walz and Hannelore Weck-Hannemann for their kind assistance. Financial support from the German National Science Foundation is greatfully acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schuknecht, L. The political economy of EC protectionism: National protectionism based on Article 115, Treaty of Rome. Public Choice 72, 37–50 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135545
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135545