Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of regional location of the inoculation site and dietary fat on the pathology of MDA-MB-435 human breast cancer cell-derived tumors grown in nude mice

  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The effects of inoculation site and dietary fat intake on the growth and metastasis of the MDA-MB-435 human breast cancer cell line were studied in athymic nude mice. The tumor cells, 1 × 106, were injected into either a right-sided thoracic or inguinal mammary fat pad (mfp), and 1 week later mice were randomly assigned to a high-fat (HF), 23% corn oil, or a low-fat (LF), 5% corn oil, diet. There were 30 mice in the HF, and 30 in the LF subgroups from each of the two inoculation site groups. The experiment was terminated 15 weeks after the tumor cell inoculations. Within the thoracic mfp-injected group, a HF diet reduced latency, increased growth rate at the primary site, and enhanced metastasis to regional lymph nodes, lungs, and intra-abdominal sites. For mice inoculated into an inguinal mfp, fat intake affected neither primary nor metastatic tumor development and growth; in both subgroups lung metastasis was significantly less than in the HF-fed, thoracic mfp-injected subgroup. The histological features of the lung metastases were consistent with a vascular mode of spread, whereas the extensive intra-abdominal lymph node involvement observed in mice with inguinal mfp tumors was in keeping with lymphatic-borne metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller FR, Miller BE and Heppner GH, 1983, Characterization of metastatic heterogeneity among subpopulations of a single mouse mammary tumor: heterogeneity in phenotypic stability.Invasion and Metastasis,3, 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Neri A, Welch D, Kawaguchi T and Nicolson GL, 1982, Development and biologic properties of malignant cell sublines and clones of a spontaneously metastasizing rat mammary adenocarcinoma.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,68, 507–517.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bogden A, Esber H, Taylor DJ and Gray J, 1974, Comparative study of the effects of surgery, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, alone and in combination, on metastases of the 13762 mammary adenocarinoma.Cancer Research,34, 1627–1631.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boylan ES and Cohen LA, 1986, The influence of dietary fat on mammary tumor metastasis in the rat.Nutrition and Cancer,8, 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shafie SM and Liotta LA, 1980, Formation of metastasis by human breast carcinoma cells (MCF-7) in nude mice.Cancer Letters,11, 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ozzello L and Sorbat M, 1980, Behavior of tumors produced by transplantation of human mammary cell lines in athymic nude mice.European Journal of Cancer,16, 553–559.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Busuttil A, O'Conor GT, Foster ME, Gurtsevitch V, Morten JEN and Steel CM, 1986, The gross pathology and histology features of tumors produced by inoculation of human cell lines into immunodeprived mice.Journal of Pathology,148, 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Price JE, Polyzos A, Zhang RD and Daniels LM, 1990, Tumorigenicity and metastasis of human breast carcinoma lines in nude mice.Cancer Research,50, 717–721.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rose DP, Connolly JM and Meschter CL, 1991, Effect of dietary fat on human breast cancer growth and lung metastasis in nude mice.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,83, 1491–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  10. American Institute of Nutrition, 1977, Report of the American Institute of NutritionAd Hoc Committee on Standards for Nutritional Studies.Journal of Nutrition,107, 1340–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bieri JG, 1980, Second report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Standards for Nutritional Studies.Journal of Nutrition,110, 1726.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Welch DR, Neri A and Nicolson GL, 1983, Comparison of “spontaneous” and “experimental” metastasis using rat 13762 mammary adenocarcinoma metastatic cell clones.Invasion and Metastasis,3, 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miller FR, 1981, Comparison of metastasis of mammary tumors growing in the mammary fat pad versus the subcutis.Invasion and Metastasis,1, 220–226.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Auerbach R, Morrissey LW and Sidky YA, 1978, Regional differences in the incidence and growth of mouse tumors following intradermal or subcutaneous inoculation.Cancer Research,38, 1739–1744.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kyriazis AA and Kyriazis AP, 1980, Preferential sites of growth of human tumors in nude mice following subcutaneous transplantation.Cancer Research,40, 4509–4511.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson AM, Steel CM, Foster ME, Kerr D, Paterson D, Deane D, Hawkins RA, Carter DC and Evans HJ, 1990, Gene expression in oestrogen dependent human breast cancer xenograft tumours.British Journal of Cancer,62, 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rose DP and Connolly JM, 1990, Effects of fatty acids and inhibitors of eicosanoid synthesis on the growth of a human breast cancer cell line in culture.Cancer Research,50, 7139–7144.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hubbard NE, Chapkin RS and Erickson KL, 1988, Inhibition of growth and linoleate-enhanced metastasis of a transplantable mouse mammary tumor by indomethacin.Cancer Letters,43, 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meschter, C.L., Connolly, J.M. & Rose, D.P. Influence of regional location of the inoculation site and dietary fat on the pathology of MDA-MB-435 human breast cancer cell-derived tumors grown in nude mice. Clin Exp Metast 10, 167–173 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132748

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132748

Keywords

Navigation