Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the pseudofacility by fluorophotometry in the human eye

  • Articles
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Pseudofacility (decrease in aqueous humor flow in response to increase in the intraocular pressure (IOP)) has been evaluated in animals and in humans by a combination of different techniques that seriously alter the ocular physiology, such as the cannulation of the eyeballs, use of radioactive isotopes, perilimbic suction cups or tonography. Very different results have been obtained. Our objective is to relate the value of the aqueous humor flow in humans (as measured by fluorometry) with IOP. In order to obtain the widest range of IOP possible, we have performed this study in both normal as well as glaucoma patients. Methods: 48 eyes were studied, corresponding to 31 subjects (mean age 58 ± 14 years). Of these, 21 corresponded to normal subjects and 27 to glaucoma patients. The aqueous humor flow (F) was determined by fluorophotometry (Protocol of Yablonsky) and the IOP was measured thereafter. Results: The mean value of F was 2.1 ± 0.5 μl/min for healthy eyes and 2.2 ± 0.7 μl/min for glaucoma-affected eyes. The values were not different (p > 0.1). The mean value of the IOP was 15.3 ±3.1 mmHg in the normal population and 22.1 ± 4.3 mmHg in the glaucoma patients. A linear relationship between F and IOP was found (r = − 0.41, p < 0.05, decrease in F = 0.081 μl min−1 mmHg−1). Conclusions: The value of the pseudofacility in the humans can be estimated at 0.081 μl min−1 mmHg−1, which constitutes 27% of the total outflow facility. This figure also makes it possible to estimate the role of the ultrafiltration in blood in the production of the aqueous humor since it is assumed that active secretion is pressure-independent. The results obtained are concordant with a secondary but no unimportant role of the plasmatic ultrafiltration with respect to the active secretion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bárány EH. Mathematical formulation of intraocular pressure as dependent on secretion, ultrafiltration, bulk outflow and osmotic reabsorption of fluid. Invest Ophthalmol 1963; 2: 584.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaufman PL. Pressure-dependent outflow. In: Klein EA (ed) The glaucomas. C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis, 1989; Vol 1, chap 9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moses RA. Intraocular pressure. In: Moses RA, Hart WM (eds) Adler's physiology of the eye. Clinical application. C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis, 1987; Chap 8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yablonsky ME, Zimmerman TJ, Waltman SR, Becker B. A fluorophotometric study of the effect of topical timolol on aqueous humor dynamics. Exp Eye Res 1978; 27/2: 135–42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jones RF, Maurice DM. New methods of measuring the rate of aqueous flow in man with fluorescein. Exp Eye Res 1966; 5: 208–13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brubaker RF. The flow of the aqueous humor in the human eye. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1982; 80: 391–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Araie M, Sawa M, Nagataki S, Mishima S. Aqueous humor dynamics in man as studied by oral fluorescein. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1980; 24: 236–41.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bloom JN, Levene RZ, Thomas G, Kimura R. Fluorophotometry and the rate of aqueous flow in man. I. Instrumentation and normal values. Arch Ophthalmol 1976; 94: 435–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coulangeon LM, Menerath JM, Sole P. Fluorophotométrie par instillation. I/Debit d'humeur aqueuse et permeabilite endothéliale. J Fr Ophthalmol 1987; 1(5): 375–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beneyto P, Benitez del Castillo JM, Fernandez Vila PC, García Sanchez J. Fluorofotometria de polo anterior: medida del flujo del humor acuoso y permeabilidad del endotelio corneal en sujetos sanos. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol Invest 1988; (1): 117-20.

  11. Diestelhorst M, Kriegistein GK. Does aqueous humor secretion decrease with age? Int Ophthalmol 1992; 16: 305–9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Levene RZ, Bloom JN, Kimura R. Fluorophotometry and the rate of aqueous flow in man. II. Primary open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1976; 94: 444–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brubaker RF, McLaren JW. Uses of fluorophotometry in glaucoma research. Opthhalmology 1985; 92: 884–91.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pham-Duy T, Becker HU, Wollensak J, Wiemer C. Tonography and fluorophotometry in the clinical study of aqueous humor dynamics. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1989; 86(3): 210.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beneyto P, Fernández Vila PC, Pérez Martínez TM, Aliseda D. A fluorophotometric study on the aqueous humor dynamics in primary open angle glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 1992; 16: 311–4.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Freddo TF, Patterson MM, Scott DR, Epstein DL. Influence of mercurial sulfhydryl agents on aqueous outflow pathways in enucleated eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984; 25: 278.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gaasterland D, Kupfer C, Ross K. Experimental glaucoma in the rhesus monkey. Invest Ophthalmol 1974; 13: 455.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bill A. Effects of long-standing stepwise increments in eye pressure on the rate of aqueous humor formation in a primate (Cercopithecus ethiops). Exp Eye Res 1971; 12: 275.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaufman PL, Bill A, Bárány EH. Formation and drainage of aqueous humor following total iris removal and ciliary muscle disinsertion in the cynomolgus monkey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977; 16: 226.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bill A, Bárány EH. Gross facility, facility of conventional routes and pseudofacility of aqueous humor outflow in the cynomolgus monkey: the reduction in aqueous humor formation rate caused by moderate increments in intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol 1966; 75: 665.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brubaker RF, Kupfer C. Determination of pseudofacility in the eye of the rhesus monkey. Arch Ophthalmol 1966; 75: 693.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brubaker RF. The measurement of pseudofacility and true facility by constant pressure perfusion in the normal rhesus monkey eye. Invest Ophthalmol 1970; 9: 42.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bárány EH. Topical epinephrine effects on true outflow resistance and pseudofacility in vervet monkeys studied by a new anterior chamber perfusion technique. Invest Ophthalmol 1968; 7: 88.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bill A. Further studies on the influence of the intraocular pressure on aqueous humor dynamics in cynomolgus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol 1967; 6: 364.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Walinder PE, Bill A. Influence of the intraocular pressure and some drugs on aqueous flow and entry of cycloleucine into the aqueous humour of vervet monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol 1969; 8: 446.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Raviola G. Effects of paracentesis on the blood-aqueous barrier: An electron microscopy study on Macaca mulatta using horseradish peroxidase as a tracer. Invest Ophthalmol 1974; 13: 828.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kupfer C, Sanderson P. Determination of pseudofacility in the eye of man. Arch Ophthalmol 1968; 80: 194.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kupfer C. Clinical significance of pseudofacility. Am J Ophthalmol 1973; 75: 193.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kupfer C, ross K. Studies of aqueous dynamics in man. I. Measurements in young normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol 1971; 10: 518.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kupfer C, Gaasterland D, Ross K. Studies of aqueous humor dynamics in man. II. Measurements in young normal subjects using acetazolamide and l-epinephrine. Invest Ophthal 1971; 10: 523.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Langham ME. Evaluation of the pressure cup technique for the measurement of aqueous humor formation. Invest Ophthalmol 1962; 1: 484.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yablonsky ME, Cook DJ, Gray J. A fluorophotometric study of the effect of argon laser trabeculoplasty on aqueous humor dynamics. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 99: 579.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pham-Duy T, Becker HU, Wollensak J, Wiemer C. Tonography and fluorophotometry in the clinical study of aqueous humor dynamics. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1989; 86(3): 210.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hayashi M, Yablonsky ME, Novack GD. Trabecular outflow facility determined by fluorophotometry in human subjects. Exp Eye Res 1989; 48: 621.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Beneyto P, Fernandez Vila PC, Pérez TU. An experimental approximation to the law of Goldmann: study of the dynamics of the aqueous humor out flow. Ann Opthhalmol 1995; 27(3): 160–66.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Phelps CD, Phelps GK. Measurement of intraocular pressure: a study of its reproductibility. Graefe's Arch Ophthalmol 1976; 198: 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Carlson KH, McLaren JW, Topper JE, Brubaker RF. Effect of body position on intraocular pressure and aqueous flow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 1346.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Green K, Pederson JE. Contribution of secretion and filtration to aqueous formation. Am J Physiol 1972; 222: 1218.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Weimbaum S et al. The rise of secretion and pressure dependent flow in aqueous humor formation. Exp Eye Res 1972; 13: 266.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bill A. The role of ciliary blood flow and ultrafiltration in aqueous in humor formation. Exp Eye Res 1973; 16: 287.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Goldmann H. On pseudofacility. Bibl Ophthalmol 1968; 78: 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, P.B., Fernández-Vila, P.C. & Pérez, T.M. Determination of the pseudofacility by fluorophotometry in the human eye. Int Ophthalmol 19, 219–223 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132690

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132690

Key words

Navigation