Skip to main content
Log in

Alterations induced in mouse chromosomes by restriction endonucleases

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fixed chromosomes of mouse have been treated with Alu I, Eco RII, Hind III or Bam HI restriction endonucleases and subsequently stained with either Giemsa, Ethidium Bromide or Acridine Orange. The results obtained have been discussed in the light of preferential or non-preferential extraction of DNA from specific chromosome areas following enzyme digestion. The possible involvement of a particular structural organization of some classes of heterochromatin has been hypothesized to account for the findings after Alu I or Eco RII treatment. The meaning of the Giemsa banding observed after Hind III or Bam HI digestion has also been considered, in comparison to the different stain responses obtained by using a DNA-specific dye such as Ethidium Bromide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrighi F. E. & Hsu T. C., 1971. Localization of heterochromatin in human chromosomes. Cytogenetics 10: 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder G. D. & Weaver M. G., 1977. DNA-protein interaction and chromosome banding. Expl Cell Res. 110: 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspersson T., Farber S., Foley G. E., Kudinowski J., Modest E. J., Simonsson E., Wagh U. & Zech L., 1968. Chemical differentiation along metaphase chromosomes. Expl Cell Res. 49: 219–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comings D. E., 1978. Mechanism of chromosome banding and implications of chromatin structure. A. Rev. Genet. 12: 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilwig I. & Gropp A., 1972. Staining of constitutive heterochromatin in mammalian chromosomes with a new fluorochrome. Expl Cell Res. 75: 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörz W. & Zachau H. G., 1977. Characterization of distinet segments in mouse satellite DNA by restriction nucleases. Eur. J. Biochem. 73: 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsich T. & Brutlag D. L., 1979. A protein that preferentially binds Drosophila satellite DNA. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76: 726–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu T. C., Cooper T. E. K., Mace M. L. & Brinkley B. R., 1971. Arrangement of centromeres in mouse cells. Chromosoma 37: 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igo-Kemenes T., Greil W. & Zachau H. G., 1977. Preparation of soluble chromatin and specific chromatin fractions with restriction nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 4: 3387–3400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lica L. & Hamkalo B., 1983. Preparation of centromeric heterochromatin by restriction endonuclease digestion of mouse I.929 cells. Chromosoma 88: 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazrimas J. A., Balhorn R. & Hatch F. T., 1979. Separation of satellite DNA chromatin and main band DNA chromatin from mouse brain. Nucleic Acids Res. 7: 935–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzanotte R. & Ferrucci L., 1981. The differential banding pattern produced by actinomycin-D, acridine orange counterstaining in metaphase chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Experientia 37: 822–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzanotte R., Ferrucei L., Vanni R. & Bianchi U., 1983a. Selective digestion of human metaphase chromosomes by Alu I restriction endonuclease. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 31: 553–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzanotte R., Bianchi U., Vanni R. & Ferrucci L., 1983b. Chromatin organization and restriction endonuclease activity on human metaphase chromosomes. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 36: 562–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D. A., Choi J. C. & Miller O. J., 1983. Chromosome localization of highly repetitive human DNAs and amplified ribosomal DNA with restriction enzymes. Science 219: 395–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll M., 1974. Subunit structure of chromatin. Nature 251: 249–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardue M. L. & Gall J. G., 1970. Chromosomal localization of mouse satellite DNA. Science 168: 1356–1358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauluhn J., Naujok A. & Zimmerman H. W., 1980. Über die quantitative fluorometrische Bestimmung von DNA mit Ethidiumbremid in der Zelle und die Konstanz der Quantenausbeute des Ethidium-DNA-Komplexes im biologischen Milieu. Z. Naturforsch. 35: 585–598c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prantera G., Bonaceorsi S. & Pimpinelli S., 1979. Simultaneous Q and R-bands after staining with chromomycin A3 or olivomycin. Science 204: 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahasrabuddhe C. G., Pathak S. & Hsu T. C., 1978. Responses of mammalian chromosomes to endonuclease digestion. Chromosoma 69: 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schendl W., 1971. Analysis of the human karyotype using a reassociation technique. Chromosoma 34: 448–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern E. M., 1975. Long range periodicities in mouse satellite DNA. J. mol. Biol. 94: 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summer A. T., 1982. The nature and mechanisms of chromosome banding. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 6: 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mezzanotte, R., Ferrucci, L. Alterations induced in mouse chromosomes by restriction endonucleases. Genetica 64, 123–128 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120262

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120262

Keywords

Navigation