Abstract
The most compelling reason for using biomarkers is that they can give information on the effect of pollutants rather than mere quantification of the levels present. The most critical aspect of environmental assessment is for society to decide how much damage it is prepared to tolerate. Once this is decided it is possible to devise tests to enforce these decisions. Suites of biomarkers have the potential to play an important role in environmental assessment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fossi, M.C. and Leonzio, C. (eds) (1993)Nondestructive Biomarkers in Vertebrates. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
Greig-Smith, P., Frampton, G. and Hardy, T. (eds) (1992)Pesticides, Cereal Farming and the Environment. London: HMSO.
Huggett, R.J., Kimerle, R.A., Mehrle, P.M.Jr and Bergman, H.L. (1992)Biomarkers. Biochemical, Physiological, and Histological Markers of Anthropogenic Stress. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
McCarthy, J.F. and Shugart, L.R. (eds) (1990)Biomarkers of Environmental Contamination. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
Peakall, D.B. (1992)Animal Biomarkers as Pollution Indicators. London: Chapman & Hall.
Peakall, D.B. and Shugart, L.R. (eds) (1993)Biomarkers. Research and Application in the Assessment of Environmental Health. Berlin: Springer.
Walker, C.H., Greig-Smith, P.W., Crossland, N.O. and Brown, R. (eds) (1991) Ecotoxicology. In Balls, M., Bridges, J. and Southee, J. eds.Animals and Alternatives in Toxicology, pp. 223–51. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peakall, D.B., Walker, C.H. The role of biomarkers in environmental assessment (3). Vertebrates. Ecotoxicology 3, 173–179 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117082
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117082