Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic fixation and active perception

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fixation is the link between the physical environment and the visual observer, both of which can be dynamic. That is, dynamic fixation serves the task of preserving a reference point in the world, despite relative motion. In this respect, fixation is dynamical in two senses: in response to voluntary changes of fixation point or attentive cues-gaze shiftings, and in response to the desire to compensate for the retinal slip-gaze holding.

The work presented here, addresses the vergence movement and preservation of binocular fixation during smooth pursuit. This movement is a crucial component of fixation. The two vergence processes, disparity vergence and accommodative vergence, are described; a novel algorithm for robust disparity vergence and an active approach for blur detection and depth from defocus are presented. The main characteristics of the disparity vergence technique are the simplicity of the algorithm, the influence of both left and right images in the course of fixation and the agreement with the fixation model of primates. The major characteristic of the suggested algorithm for blur detection is its active approach which makes it suitable for achieving qualitative and reasonable depth estimations without unrealistic assumptions about the structures in the images.

The paper also covers the integration of the two processes disparity vergence and accommodation vergence which are in turn accomplished by an integration of the disparity and blur stimuli. This integration is accounted for in both static and dynamic experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A.L. and Ahuja, N. 1988. Surface reconstruction by dynamic integration of focus, camera vergence and stereo. Proc. 2nd ICCV, Tampa, FL., pp. 532–543.

  • Alpern M. and Ellen P. 1956. A quantitative analysis of the horizontal movements of the eyes in the experiment of Johannes Müller. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 42:289–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpern M. 1957. The position of the eyes during prism vergence. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 57:345–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calway, A.D., Knutsson, H., and Wilson, r. 1992. Multiresolution estimation of 2-D disparity using frequency domain approach. Proc. BMVC, pp. 237–246.

  • Carpenter R.H.S. 1988. Movements of the Eyes, Pion press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.J. and Ferrier, N.J. 1988. Modal control of an attentive vision system. Proc. 2nd ICCV, Tampa, FL., pp. 514–523.

  • Coombs, D.J. 1992. Real-time gaze holding in binocular robot vision. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rochester.

  • Fry G.A. 1937. An experimental analysis of the accommodation-convergence relationship. American Journal of Optometry, 14:402–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry G.A. 1939. Further experiments on the accommodation-convergence relationship. American Journal of Optometry, 16:325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horii A. 1992. The focusing mechanism in the KTH head-eye system. TRITA-NA-P9215, Royal Institute of Technology, Computational Vision and Active Perception Laboratory, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horii A. 1992. Depth from defocusing. TRITA-NA-P16, Royal Institute of Technology, Computational Vision and Active Perception Laboratory, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, B.K.P. 1989. Robot Vision, The MIT Press, p. 25.

  • Jarvis R.A. 1976. Focus optimisation criteria for computer image processing. Microscope, 24(2):163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepson, A.D. and Jenkin, M.R.M. 1989. The fast computation of disparity from phase differences. Proc. CVPR, pp. 398–403.

  • Julesz, B. 1971. Foundations of cyclopean perception. University of Chicago Press.

  • Knoll H.A. 1949. Pupillary changes associated with accommodation and convergence. American Journal of Optometry, 26:346–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotkov, E.P. 1989. Active Computer Vision by Cooperative Focus and Stereo, Springer Verlag, 1989.

  • Luneburg R.K. 1948. Mathematical Analysis of Binocular Vision, Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox E.E. 1886. Investigations in the relation between convergence and the accommodation of the eyes. Journal of Anatomy, 20:475–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, A., Uhlin, T., and Eklundh, J.-O. 1993. Phase-based disparity estimating in binocular tracking. Proc. 8th Scandinavian conf. on Image Analysis, Tromsø, Norway.

  • Marg E. and Morgan M.W. 1949. The pupillary near reflex. The relation of pupillary diameter to accommodation and the various components of convergence. American Journal of Optometry, 26:183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marg E. and Morgan M.W. 1949. Further investigation of the pupillary near reflex; the effect of accommodation, fusional convergence and the proximity factor on pupillary diameter. American Journal of Optometry, 27:217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller J. 1826. Zur Vergleichenden Physiologie des Gesichtssinnes, C. Conbloch, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahlavan, K., Uhlin, T., and Eklundh, J.-O. 1992. Integrating Primary Ocular Processes. Proc. 2nd ECCV, Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, pp. 526–541.

  • Pahlavan, K. and Eklundh, J.-O. 1992. A head-eye system-analysis and design. CVGIP: Image Understanding, Special Issue on Active Vision, Y. Aloimonos (ed.) 56(1):41–56.

  • Pahlavan K., Uhlin T., and Eklundh J.-O. 1993. Active vision as a methodology. Active Vision, Y. Aloimonos (ed.). Advances in Computer Science, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahlavan, K. 1993. Active robot vision and primary ocular processes. Ph.D. Thesis, TRITA-NA-P9316, Royal Institute of Technology, Computational Vision and Active Perception Laboratory, Stockholm.

  • Pahlavan, K. and Eklundh, J.-O. 1994. Mechatronics of active vision. Mechatronics, Elsevier Science, pp. 113–123.

  • Pentland, A. 1987. A new sense for depth of field. Proc. IEEE Trans. PAMI, pp. 523–531.

  • Pentland, A., Darrell, T., Turk, M., and Huang, W. 1989. A simple real-time range camera. Proc. CVPR, pp. 256–261.

  • Sanger T.D. 1988. Stereo disparity computation using Gabor filters. Biological Cybernetics, 59:405–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbarao, M. 1988. Parallel depth recovery by changing camera parameters. Proc. 2nd ICCV, pp. 149–155.

  • Tenenbaum, J.M. 1970. Accommodation in Computer Vision, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University.

  • Yarbus A. 1967. Eye Movements and Vision, Plenum Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. and Bergholm, F. 1993. An extension of Marr's “Signature” based edge classification and other methods determining diffuseness and height of edges, and bar edge width. Proc. 4th ICCV, Berlin, pp. 183–191.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Pahla, K., Uhlin, T. & Eklundh, JO. Dynamic fixation and active perception. Int J Comput Vision 17, 113–135 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058748

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058748

Keywords

Navigation