Abstract
Sepia-eyed flies carrying the slow electrophoretic variant of either Est-6 or Adh were introduced in low numbers and at infrequent intervals into populations of wildtype flies (+se/+se) that were also homozygous for the fast moving variant of either Est-6 (50 populations) or Adh (50 populations). After 24 generations, the frequency of the sepia alleles was approximately 25%, although there was considerable variation from population to population. The fate of the Est-6 slow allele corresponded closely to that of sepia (which is located ten map units distant), although one population retained the slow allozyme variant but rejected sepia. The Adh slow allele was also retained by many populations. A number of them retained Adh-S but not sepia, and vice versa; these loci are on different chromosomes. The advantage of sepia heterozygotes was estimated to be about twice that of wildtype homozygotes. The data suggest that the selective advantage resides not with the sepia locus itself, but with a nearby chromosomal region.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dobzhansky, Th. & Lovene, H., 1948. Genetics of natural popullations, XVII. Proof of operation of natural selection in wild populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 33: 537–547.
Vann, E. G., 1966. The fate of X-ray induced chromosomal rearrangements introduced into laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 100: 425–449.
Wallace, B., 1966. The fate of sepia in small populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 37: 29–36.
Wallace, B., 1979. The migration of a mutant gene into isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 50: 67–72.
Wallace, B., 1981. Basic population genetics. Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Financial support for work reported here was supplied under grant number GM24850, National Institutes of Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wallace, B. The fate of several migrant genes in isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster . Genetica 58, 141–151 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056782
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056782