Skip to main content
Log in

A relation between G-, C-, and N-band patterns as revealed by progressive oxidation of chromosomes and a note on the nature of N-bands

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Near-ultraviolet irradiation of chromosome preparations mounted in a hydrogen peroxide solution resulted in an oxidative disintegration of the structure of fixed metaphase chromosomes with concomitant production of various band patterns appearing after staining with Giemsa. Neither irradiation nor hydrogen peroxide alone could produce banding. After irradiation in the presence of hydrogen peroxide the gradually increasing effect of oxidation on the chromosomes along the gradient of light intensities from the periphery of the slide towards the radiation focus in the centre of the slide became visible as G-, C-, and N-banding, respectively. Close to the centre only contours of chromosomes were left after this treatment. Although G-banding and differential DNA-extraction often went together, extraction of DNA was not an absolute requirement to obtain a G-band pattern. N-bands appeared to be the chromosomal regions that were most resistant to destruction. Staining methods specific for DNA failed to demonstrate these bands, although with Giemsa an intense staining reaction occurred. On the analogy of the staining behaviour of model protein preparations with Giemsa a phosphoprotein nature is suggested for the N-band material in the chromosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrighi, F. E. & Hsu, T. C., 1971. Localization of heterochromatin in human chromosomes. Cytogenetics 10: 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, M., Madan, K. & Pearson, P., 1972. Staining of some specific regions of human chromosomes, particularly the secondary constriction of no. 9. Nature new Biol. 238: 122–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder, G. D. & Weaver, M. G., 1977. DNA-protein interactions and chromosome banding. Expl Cell Res. 110: 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys, C. H. C. M. & Osinga, J., 1981. The role of chromosomal proteins in the induction of a differential staining of sister chromatids by light. Histochem. J.: 735–746.

  • Buys, C. H. C. M., Osinga, J. & Stienstra, S., 1981. Rapid irradiation procedure for obtaining permanent differential staining of sister chromatids and aspects of its underlying mechanism. Hum. Genet. 57: 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys, C. H. C. M. & Stienstra, S., 1980. Involvement of sulfhydryl groups of chromosomal proteins in sister chromatid differentiation. Chromosoma 77: 325–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T. R. & Ruddle, F. H., 1971. Karyotype analysis utilizing differentially stained constitutive heterochromatin of human and murine chromosomes. Chromosoma 34: 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comings, D. E., Avelino, E., Okada, T. A. & Wyandt, H. E., 1973. The mechanism of C- and G-banding of chromosomes. Expl Cell Res. 77: 469–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drets, M. E. & Shaw, M. W., 1971. Specific banding patterns of human chromosomes. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68: 2073–2077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux, B., DeGrouchy, J., Finaz, C. & Lejeune, J., 1971. Mise en évidence de la structure fine des chromosomes humains par digestion enzymatique (pronase en particulier). Compt. rend. Acad. Sci. Ser. D. 273: 587–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funaki, K., Matsui, S. & Sasaki, M., 1975. Location of nucleolus organizers in animal and plant chromosomes by means of an improved N-banding technique. Chromosoma 49: 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R., 1981. DNase I digestion of fixed chromosomes specifically reveals NORs in man. Expl Cell Res. 131: 476–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. & Laberge, C., 1972. Specific cytological recognition of the heterochromatic segment of number 9 chromosome in man. Expl Cell Res. 73: 239–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. F., Ingram, D. J. E., Symons, M. C. R. & Townsend, M. G., 1957. Electron resonance studies of different radical species formed in rigid solutions of hydrogen peroxide after u.-v.-irradiation. Trans Faraday Soc. 53: 914–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist, G., 1979. The mechanism of C-banding: depurination and β-climination. Chromosoma 72: 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. C., 1979. Human and mammalian cytogenetics. An historical perspective, pp. 186. Springer Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Y.-F. & Arrighi, F. E., 1977. Comparative studies on N-banding and silver staining of NORs in human chromosomes. In: Aspects of the chromosome organization and function. Eds M. E. Drets, N. Brum-Zorilla & G. A. Folle. pp. 49–55. 3rd Latin-American Cong. Genet., Montevideo.

  • Lau, Y.-F., Wertelecki, W., Pfeiffer, R. A. & Arrighi, F. E., 1979. Cytological analyses of a 14p+ variant by means of N-banding and combinations of silver staining and chromosome bandings. Hum. Genet. 46: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lischwe, M. A., Smetana, K., Olson, M. O. J. & Busch, H., 1979. Proteins C23 and B23 are the major nucleolar silver staining proteins. Life Sci. 25: 701–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsui, S., 1974. Structural proteins associated with ribosomal cistrons in Xenopus laevis chromosomes. Expl Cell Res. 88: 88–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsui, S. & Sasaki, M., 1973. Differential staining of nucleolus organizers in mammalian chromosomes. Nature 246: 148–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. O. J., Orrick, L. R., Jones, C. & Busch, H., 1974. Phosphorylation of acid-soluble nucleolar proteins of Novikoff hepatoma ascites cells in vivo. J. biol. Chem. 249: 2823–2827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardue, M. L. & Gall, J. G., 1970. Chromosomal localization of mouse satellite DNA. Science 168: 1356–1358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, S. R., Merrick, S. & Lubs, H. A., 1971. Identification of each human chromosome with a modified Giemsa stain. Science 173: 821–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahasrabuddhe, C. G., Pathak, S. & Hsu, T. C., 1978. Responses of mammalian metaphase chromosomes to endonuclease digestion. Chromosoma 69: 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabright, M., 1971. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet II: 971–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. T., 1980. Dye binding mechanisms in G-banding of chromosomes. J. Microscopy 119: 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. T. & Evans, H. J., 1973. Mechanisms involved in the banding of chromosomes with quinacrine and Giemsa. II. The interaction of the dyes with the chromosomal components. Expl Cell Res. 81: 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. T., Evans, H. J. & Buckland, R. A., 1971. A new technique for distinguishing between human chromosomes. Nature new Biol. 232: 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. T., Evans, H. J. & Buckland, R. A., 1973. Mechanisms involved in the banding of chromosomes with quinacrine and Giemsa. I. The effects of fixation in methanolacetic acid. Expl Cell Res. 81: 214–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utakoji, T., 1972. Differential staining patterns of human chromosomes treated with potassium permanganate. Nature 239: 168–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van derZwaag-Gerritsen, J. W. & Buys, C. H. C. M., 1980. A cytochemical study on the possible involvement of phosphopeptide regions of nucleolar proteins in the selective silver staining of active ribosomal RNA-genes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 22: 118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. C. & Fedoroff, S., 1972. Banding in human chromosomes treated with trypsin. Nature new Biol. 235: 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buys, C.H.C.M., Osinga, J. A relation between G-, C-, and N-band patterns as revealed by progressive oxidation of chromosomes and a note on the nature of N-bands. Genetica 58, 3–9 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055996

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055996

Keywords

Navigation