Abstract
The motive/strategy model underlying the learning process inventories of both Biggs and Entwistle has major implications for both educational practice and research. As yet, however, there is only limited empirical support for the validity of the model. This paper reports findings, several as yet unpublished, from a number of the writer's investigations which throw light on this issue. Overall, these results question the validity of the model and fail to confirm several plausible propositions based on the model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 266–279.
Biggs, J. B. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8, 381–394.
Biggs, J. B. (1982). Student motivation and study strategies in university and college of advance education populations. Higher Education Research and Development, 1, 33–55.
Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of meta-learning in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185–212.
Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
Dahlgren, L. O. (1984). Outcomes of learning. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N. (Eds.), The Experience of Learning, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
Entwistle, N. J. and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
Fransson, A. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning: IV—Effects of motivation and test anxiety on process and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 244–257.
Kenny, D. A. (1977). Cross-lagged panel correlation: a test of spuriousness. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1987–903.
Laurillard, D. (1979). The processes of student learning. Higher Education, 8, 395–409.
Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N. (Eds.) (1984). The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
O' Neil, M. J. and Child, D. (1984). Biggs's SPQ: a British study of its internal structure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 228–234.
Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8, 411–428.
Ramsden, P. and Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students spproaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368–383.
Saljo, R. (1979). Learning about learning. Higher Education, 8, 443–351.
Thomas, P. R. and Bain, J. D. (1982). Consistency in learning strategies. Higher Education, 11, 249–259.
Watkins, D. (1982a). Identifying the study process dimensions of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Education, 26, 76–85.
Watkins, D. (1982b). Factors influencing the study methods of Australian tertiary students. Higher Education, 11, 369–380.
Watkins, D. (1982c). Academic achievement and the congruence of study motivation and strategy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 260–263.
Watkins, D. (1983). Assessing tertiary study processes. Human Learning, 22, 29–37.
Watkins, D. and Hattie, J. (1981). The learning processes of Australian university students: investigations of contextual and personological factors. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 384–393.
Watkins, D. and Hattie, J. (1985). A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. Human Learning, 4, 127–141.
Wolf, F. M., Chandler, T. A. and Spies, C. J. (1981). A cross-lagged panel analysis of quality of school life and achievement responsibility. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 363–368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watkins, D. The motive/stategy model of learning processes: some empirical findings. Instr Sci 17, 159–168 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052702
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052702