Skip to main content
Log in

Application of the weight function method to two-dimensional elastodynamic fracture mechanics

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the weight function method is used for two-dimensional mixed-mode crack analyses of clastostatic and elastodynamic problems. By the use of the Laplace transformation method and an indirect boundary element method, the dynamic stress intensity factors for a finite sheet containing a central or an edge crack are evaluated. A Green's function method is introduced which depends on the weight function for an impulsive applied load. The Green's function can be used to determine stress intensity factors for arbitrary time dependence of the boundary conditions. The stress intensity factors obtained by the weight function method are compared where possible, with existing solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.F., Bueckner, A novel principle for the computation of stress intensity factors, Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Mecanik 50 (1970) 529–546.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.R., Rice, Some remarks on elastic crack-tip stress fields, International Journal of Solids and Structures 8 (1972) 751–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P.C. Paris, R.M. McMeeking, and H. Tada, The weight function method for determining stress intensity factors, in Cracks and Fracture, J.L. Swedlow and M.L. Williams (eds.) STP 601, ASTM (1976) 471–489.

  4. Y., Bortmann and L., Banks-Sills, An extended weight function method for 2D and 3D-problems, Journal of Applied Mechanics 50 (1983) 907–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G.T., Sha and C.T., Yang, Weight function calculations for mixed mode fracture problems with the virtual crack extension technique, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 21 (1985) 1119–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.H., Aliabadi, D.J., Cartwright and D.P., Rooke, Fracture-mechanics weight-function by the removal of singular fields using boundary element analysis, International Journal of Fracture 40 (1989) 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D.P., Rooke and M.H., Aliabadi, The use of fundamental fields to obtain weight functions for mixed-mode cracks, International Journal of Engineering Science 32 (1994) 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M.H., Aliabadi and D.P., Rooke, Numerical Fracture Mechanics, Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton and Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. P.H., Wen, M.H., Aliabadi and D.P., Rooke, A fictitious stress and displacement discontinuity method for dynamic crack problems, in Boundary Element Method XVI, C.A., Brebbia (ed.), Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton (1994) 469–476.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Murakami, Stress Intensity Factors Handbook, Pergamon Press (1987).

  11. J., Dominguez, Boundary Elements in Dynamics, Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S., Hirose and J.D., Achenbach, Time-domain boundary element analysis of elastic wave interaction with a crack, International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering 28 (1989) 629–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S., Hirose and J.D., Achenbach, Acoustic emission and near-tip elastodynamic fields of a growing pennyshaped crack, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 39 (1991) 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P., Fedelinski, M.H., Aliabadi and D.P., Rooke, The dual boundary element method for dynamic analysis of cracked pin-loaded lugs, in Localized Damage III, Computer Aided Assessment and Control, M.H., Aliabadi et al. (eds.), Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton (1994) 571–520.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J., Sladek and V., Sladek, A boundary integral equation method for dynamic crack problems, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 27 (1987) 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P., Fedelinski, M.H., Aliabadi and D.P., Rooke, The dual boundary element method: Ĵ-integral for dynamic stress intensity factors, International Journal of Fracture 65 (1994) 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. F., Durbin, Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms: an efficient improvement to Dubner and Abate's method, The Computer Journal 17 (1974) 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y.M., Chen, Numerical computation of dynamic stress intensity factors by a Lagrangian finite-difference method(the HEMP CODE), Engineering Fracture Mechanics 7 (1975) 653–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L.B., Freund and J.R., Rice, On the determination of elastodynamic crack tip stress fields, International Journal of Solids and Structures 10 (1974) 411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H.J., Petroski, J.L., Glazik and J.D., Achenbach, Construction of a dynamic weight function from a finiteelement solution for a cracked beam, Journal of Applied Mechanics 47 (1980) 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wen, P.H., Aliabadi, M.H. & Rooke, D.P. Application of the weight function method to two-dimensional elastodynamic fracture mechanics. Int J Fract 76, 193–206 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048286

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048286

Keywords

Navigation